Originally posted by: Blastman
In this hardwarefr review the 9600pro was 18.7% faster than the 4200 overall in 12 games (1600x1200). This would put it right around a 4600 which is about 15-20% faster than a 4200.
When they ran the benches at ? 10x7 4AA/8AF ? the 9600pro was 86.4% faster than the 4200 which would put it way ahead of a 4600.
I would take 9600pro. DX9 support too, 4600 is only DX8.
If you go 9600pro and want to overclock make sure you get one with the 2.8ns Samsung memory.