• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Thunderbird or Duron?- building a new computer.

Gamerz

Member
I am looking to build a new overclocked computers ( my dual Celry 400's @ 550 is getting slow🙂!

I am going to buy the Abit board, but I would like to know which chip would give me the most bang for the buck. I am looking at the Duron 650 or the thunderbird 750. Any ideas?
 
Most bang for the buck would probly be the 600, at 50 bucks you can't beat it, but, you're looking at the Duron 650 or T-Bird 750.

Probly best bang per dollar would be the Duron, for almost twice as much you get 100MHz and a bigger L2 cache. In tests a t-bird only outdoes an equally clocked duron by 5-10%. But, nothing beats the bragging rites on a thunderbird. If you've got the money, go with the t-bird.

Also, SETI@Home runs better on a t-bird due to the CLI fitting perfectly in the tbirds L2 cache.
 
You pay a premium for those "bragging rights" though. In my mind I couldn't justify the extra money for a 10-15% performance gain. I got the KT7 mobo so I can upgrade to a T-Bird when prices drop. In the meantime I've got a Duron 600 running at 900MHz. Like Maniac9127 said, that's definitely the most bang for the buck.

 
duron is better performance cost ratio, but i went with thunderbird because i paid $40 dollars more and got a tbird 800. the duron 700 i saw was $99, i paid $140 for tbird. But from what i've seen and read, they are both awesome chips...
 
Back
Top