So what you are saying is that race matters?
Would you please elaborate how it does in this matter?
Or will you concede that you are nothing but a çowardly wise and beautiful woman who just tried to one up a woman to feel more like a man.
When you factor in economic status the disproportionality is dimished.
So what you are saying is that race matters?
Would you please elaborate how it does in this matter?
Or will you concede that you are nothing but a çowardly wise and beautiful woman who just tried to one up a woman to feel more like a man.
Vast majority. Right.
So interesting that you and your clan of "racial realists" haven't really paid attention to this thread. Did you guys open it and then close it immediately in disappointment?
Vast majority. Right.
<snip>
SHM, they knew by your title what lied in store. Prolly didn't even click it.
If they don't get an opportunities to call someone a thug in "deep cover", they won't even bother. They also aren't interested if they won't have an opportunity to discuss black crime.
You are one of the most vocal people who try and divide up white/black issues. You don't even hide it, so don't pitch a fit when you get called out for it.
We don't have to look any further than the Jordan Davis and Treyvon Martin thread to see that isn't true. :biggrin:
Wow, you're one to talk. You are one of the most vocal people who try and divide up white/black issues. You don't even hide it, so don't pitch a fit when you get called out for it.
That's always been a clever defense by the right. Someone points out your bias and you accuse them of being biased.
But SHM is correct black crimes are more likely characterized here as evil or cultural. Crimes by whites are misunderstandings or just a few random crazy people.
If thug is such a benign term for young criminals why are so many loath the use it for young white criminals???
The reason the "other threads" get so much attention is because you and the rest of your crew vehemently defend obvious thugs trying to make everything black and white.
No one is defending these losers, and that's why nobody cares.
I'm not saying there aren't reasons why African Americans (and other groups) tend to have higher criminal involvement, which is what you seem to be pointing out. Just that the percentage is higher.
It's like terrorism, when Asians or whites ever become the (by far) vastly responsible demographic for terrorist attacks, I will be less inclined to believe that a muslim is responsible. But until that is the case (for example) I don't find the need to suppress my natural inclination to believe another muslim has commited the latest terrorist attack whenever it happens.
Is that racist ? I think it's just common sense until the numbers go elsewhere.
Oh please, if they had been black, you would have posted 70-80 times by now. So just shut up..................
Justice not found. They should have been put to death, preferably by kickings
Black crimes are vastly more likely to be characterized as cultural because black people are vastly more likely to be involved in crimes. Something like 1/3 30 year old black men is involved with the justice system.
A thug is a person who routinely goes around committing crimes. If a young white criminal fits that profile I have no problem referring to them as a thug.
If you take crime stats with middle-upper classs blacks vs whites the crime stats would be similar.
By your argument people sitting in a tub half filled with water tend to be wet and its due to the people.
BTW - Are you saying white collar crime is cultural aka white males are inherintly corrupt because they are white males??
Oh please, if they had been black, you would have posted 70-80 times by now. So just shut up..................
Do you understand the difference between race and culture?
Also: http://www.infoplease.com/world/statistics/most-corrupt-countries.html
Note the lack of white countries.