"I've bought everything I own, mom doesn't buy jack squat, and when I bought the gf2 it was the hottest thing on the market, best I remember I bought it for $140"
Er, Curt, I wasn't trying to say your mom bought you the card. Look here:
http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=1453&p=2
"The GeForce2 MX core is based off of a crippled version of the GeForce2 GTS core. In order to separate the high-end part from the lower-end one, NVIDIA choose to limit the power of the GeForce2 MX in three ways." etc.
The GF MX-anything isn't a real GF; they're crippled down to about half the performance so people can buy a VGA for <$150. When the R8500 came out, it was the most technologically advanced gaming VGA you could buy, and cost $300..
Before you call me a "moron" , why don't you look at who just said their GF2 MX was the "hottest thing on the market" when it suxored, like every other GF MX?
"I know the 8500 is/was supposed to perform with the GF4 series"
Actually, it was supposed to compete with the GF3 series, GF4s came out many months later.
"You think I'm an ATI lapdog, because of the differnece in the 8500 and a gf2"
No, I think you're trying to compare apples and oranges. You can't compare one company's cheapest card to another company's best. Like I said, I've given ATI a LOT of money over the years- starting with their 2MB VRAM card back in the mid 90s with the Mach 32 chip on it. This year I bought a R8500 and R9700 off them, both retail box. Last year I bought a VIVO and a 32DDR. The year before that a MAXX and a Rage 32- get the picture? I like ATI as much as anyone. (although I could post the same about 3dfx or nVidia)
"yeah let me compare the 533Celeron to a 1600xp while I'm at it."
You basically did, and then called me a moron for pointing it out.