Thousands of Israelis rally in defence of human rights

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,330
126
Would not Israel though have to prove for each "Palestinian" (in "" because there is no such people before '48) that owned land that in fact said "Palestinian" did in fact gamble and lose, and not flee the fighting?

If they can't prove that, then would not that land belong rightfully to the "Palestinian", and not Israel?

Example:

We're in effect being soft attacked by Mexico. If we militarily go across the border to F up these Mexican POS's that are creating havoc in Mexico and playing a large part in making Mexicans come here (not in total part, but, a large part), and the citizens flee while our military is rolling through...

...that land doesn't belong to the US. It still belongs to those Mexican's that owned it before.

So how precisely did Israel figure out for all these pieces of owned land that each of those owners conspired with Israel's enemies at the time?

Chuck

So you are in favor of giving a few states like California back to Mexico? What about most of the country that we jacked from the Native Americans at gunpoint? Wanna give all that back too or is there a certain time limit on spoils of war in your mind? If Israel can hold on to the land for another 50 years or so would you consider it non-stolen Israeli land?
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
Hmmmm...could we in fact give Kalifornia back to Mexico? What's the point if Mexican's are already taking it back because of our bleeding heart/greed inaction?

I do feel very bad about what we did to the NA's, however, what could we do now? It's 150 years past too late to do anything about it. There are no living people that were involved with that, there was no UN, etc.

Israel on the other hand has many people in essentially concentration camp communities, that are still alive, that have Israeli's living on their land: Illegally it appears.

And that illegality is determined by the UN, the same UN that got Israel formed in the first place.

As far as 'another 50 years', that's exactly what Israel is going for, it's obvious. They're going to keep stalling - they have that luxury, the "Pal's" don't - and keep settling - knowing they shouldn't be - so as to keep pushing the "Pal's" futher and further. Israel can't go wrong with it's current strategery.

That doesn't make it right...

Chuck