Thought concerning vdroop and turbo multipliers

Discussion in 'CPUs and Overclocking' started by Yuriman, Nov 5, 2012.

  1. Yuriman

    Yuriman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,981
    Likes Received:
    38
    I had a forum member ask a question in a PM regarding turbo multipliers, and something occurred to me that should have been obvious: if you leave LLC off, you can probably get away with having a higher multiplier with just 1 or 2 active cores because vdroop will be less with fewer cores active.

    For instance, with LLC on high, you might run:
    1 Active Core : 44x
    2 Active Cores: 44x
    3 Active Cores: 44x
    4 Active Cores: 44x

    ^ Because voltage would be approximately the same regardless of load level.


    And with LLC off, because voltage is higher at partial loads, you could run:
    1 Active Core: 45x
    2 Active Cores: 45x
    3 Active Cores: 44x
    4 Active Cores: 44x

    Interestingly, with LLC disabled on my board, partial load vcore is almost exactly the amount higher than full load voltage needed to run 100mhz faster.

    I'm considering playing around with having staggered turbo multipliers now.
     
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads - Thought vdroop turbo Forum Date
    One core very hot no matter what. Thoughts? CPUs and Overclocking May 9, 2017
    [Thought] Could Intel get sued over Kaby Lake? CPUs and Overclocking Feb 19, 2017
    Some thoughts about 6700K OC stability, overinvestment in cooling, and mobo choices CPUs and Overclocking Sep 27, 2016
    Swiftech H240 X2 Review/Thoughts CPUs and Overclocking May 25, 2016
    How to compensate for vdroop so idle voltages are lower than load CPUs and Overclocking Aug 19, 2013