• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

this watch ugly or no? (more pics)

That's worth $400? Holy crap.

I've got one that looks shockingly similar, but silver instead of gold highlights on the face. Twenty bucks.

I vote "not ugly" but then again, I'm not that obsessive over watches.

- M4H
 
couple things about it
1)it has a sapphire crystal. pretty hard to scratch
2) the titanium is coated w/ a glass-like substance. Also very hard to scratch.
 
It's an Eco-drive though, and I'm sure is a quality watch. I like watches with bigger faces, but that watch looks okay. $400 is a bit pricey, but worth it if you like the watch...
 
normal.

i wouldnt ever pay $400 for a watch though. unless it sets itself, acts as a pager, can check /. , acts as a remote, and has usb storage

if this watch can do something remarkable while it tells time id be interested in knowing what the hell it was.

 
Originally posted by: GreenGhost
For $400 you can buy a classier watch... like, Swiss made, sporty, & all...

blasphemy

swiss watches suck compared to the quality of imported jap watches. ($ for $)
 
it's not the most attractive watch ever, but i wouldn't call it "ugly"

it's just another watch.... or something... heheh
 
Originally posted by: waylman
its not bad...kind of boring.
When was a watch supposed to be exciting and the life of the party?

Nice looking watch, I voted not ugly. I could never bring myself to pay $400 for a watch for myself or anybody else, though.
 
Back
Top