This time Nebraska :D

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
"For more than three years, the front porch of an upscale, two-story home in the Elkhorn area was a stage for strippers.

Prostitutes bared their breasts and sometimes completely disrobed. Their pimps peered into the windows.

It happened at least 75 times. The strippers were a vexing mystery to the home's residents, a couple in their 30s with 1 and 3-year-old boys, who sometimes were alerted to an arrival by someone kicking on their door or ringing the bell.


When the couple answered the door, some of the strippers became upset because they expected to be paid by someone at the residence.

The couple could not explain the train of escorts that they believe began in May 2013, about a month after the couple moved in.

The answer became clearer in March during an investigation by law enforcement.

The man responsible for the unwanted shows lived just across the street at North 185th and Indiana Streets, according to the Douglas County Sheriff's Office.

Douglas Goldsberry, their 45-year-old neighbor, was arrested Wednesday by deputies with the Douglas County Sheriff's Office. They allege that he paid the women and that he was motivated by his own sexual gratification.

He watched from his kitchen window and masturbated, he told a deputy in an interview, the Sheriff's Office said.

"Goldsberry said there were occasions when he would take digital photographs of the girls and save them to a memory card," the deputy wrote in an affidavit filed in Douglas County Court.

Goldsberry was charged with felony pandering.

The family sought a protection order against him.

In it, the husband wrote that Goldsberry was playing a "sick sexual game of getting them to strip completely nude on our front porch for his selfish enjoyment.

"This has resulted in a paranoid and extremely fearful household for my young family and a complete interruption of our daily lives," the man wrote.


The man's wife called law enforcement authorities in March, when strippers appeared eight days that month. Deputies conducted surveillance on the street on two nights in late March, and on one of those nights they watched as two women exposed their breasts on the porch.

Deputies interviewed the women and learned that they were hired through backpage.com, a classified advertising website that features ads for escorts. The Sheriff's Office retrieved information from the women's phone that led them to the suspect. They also obtained photos of text messages between the women and the suspect.

Beyond the pandering accusation, the Sheriff's Office alleges that Goldsberry met with escorts in hotel rooms for sex.

In the back of his vehicle he carried a roadside hazard bag that held the accoutrements for sex sales. Cash, lubricant, hotel keys and a list of escorts and contact information.

Goldsberry was jailed Thursday night. His wife did not return a reporter's call.


Oh, commentary. Go Huskers!
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,825
20,425
146
Best thing to come out of Nebraska is 311, other than that I'll just fly over

Why isn't prostitution legal again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
I used to live like 10 minutes from Elkhorn. Ate at a BBQ restaurant on the little quiet main street a bunch of times. Sadly I didn't get dinner and a stripper show when I was there. :(

This is twice recently Elkhorn has been in the news. Last time was the family that had the toddler snatched by the gator at the Disney resort.
 

KMFJD

Lifer
Aug 11, 2005
33,371
53,365
136
Best thing to come out of Nebraska is 311, other than that I'll just fly over

Why isn't prostitution legal again?

I think it started to go downhill when these guys arrived....

Thanksgiving.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
63,183
19,517
136
Best thing to come out of Nebraska is 311, other than that I'll just fly over

Why isn't prostitution legal again?
311 sucks, but we have some solid breweries here now, at least. I haven't tried all the local whiskey yet, some of it may be good.
And, you know, Carhenge. Woo.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,825
20,425
146
FU mang, 311 is my jams :D

And I'm gluten free, no more beer for me :(

I'll take corn booze, but not much and I'm a manlet lightweight
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,391
5,004
136
As long as you know it was the Indians that supplied the food to make the thanksgiving feast for the starving pilgrims.

First I think Thanksgiving happened long before Nebraska.

Secondly You are incorrect.

http://www.history.com/topics/thanksgiving/first-thanksgiving-meal

http://time.com/4577425/thanksgiving-2016-true-story/

1. More than 100 people attended

The Wampanoag Indians who attended the first Thanksgiving had occupied the land for thousands of years and were key to the survival of the colonists during the first year they arrived in 1620, according to the National Museum of the American Indian. After the Pilgrims successfully harvested their first crops in autumn 1621, at least 140 people gathered to eat and partake in games, historians say. No one knows exactly what prompted the two groups to dine together, but there were at least 90 native men and 50 Englishmen present, according to Kathleen Wall, a colonial foodways culinarian at Plimoth Plantation. They most likely ran races and shot at marks as forms of entertainment, Wall said. The English likely ate off of tables, while the native people dined on the ground.

2. They ate for three days
The festivities went on for three days, according to primary accounts. The nearest village of native Wampanoag people traveled on foot for about two days to attend, Wall said. “It takes so long to get somewhere, that once you get there you stay a while,” she said.

3. Deer topped the menu
Venison headlined the meal, although there was a healthy selection of fowl and fish, according to the Pilgrim Hall Museum, which cited writings by Plymouth leaders Edward Winslow and William Bradford. There was a “great store of wild turkeys” to be eaten, as well as ducks and geese, wrote Bradford, who was the governor. Winslow said Massasoit, the leader of the Wampanoag people, contributed five deer to the dinner.

4. It wasn’t called Thanksgiving
There’s no evidence that the 1621 feast was called Thanksgiving, and the event was not repeated for at least a decade, experts say. Still, it is said to be the inspiration behind the now traditional annual gathering and a testament to the cooperation of two groups of people. It showed “two communities that are diplomatically connected coming together,” said Richard Pickering, Plimoth Plantation’s deputy executive director. Abraham Lincoln officially declared Thanksgiving a national holiday by proclamation in 1863.

5. The peace was short-lived
Early European colonizers and Native Americans lived in peace through a symbiotic relationship for about 10 years until thousands of additional settlers arrived, Pickering said. Up to 25,000 Englishmen landed in the New World between 1630 and 1642, after a plague drastically cut the native population by what's believed to be more than half, he said.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,406
136
First I think Thanksgiving happened long before Nebraska.

Secondly You are incorrect.

http://www.history.com/topics/thanksgiving/first-thanksgiving-meal

http://time.com/4577425/thanksgiving-2016-true-story/

1. More than 100 people attended

The Wampanoag Indians who attended the first Thanksgiving had occupied the land for thousands of years and were key to the survival of the colonists during the first year they arrived in 1620, according to the National Museum of the American Indian. After the Pilgrims successfully harvested their first crops in autumn 1621, at least 140 people gathered to eat and partake in games, historians say. No one knows exactly what prompted the two groups to dine together, but there were at least 90 native men and 50 Englishmen present, according to Kathleen Wall, a colonial foodways culinarian at Plimoth Plantation. They most likely ran races and shot at marks as forms of entertainment, Wall said. The English likely ate off of tables, while the native people dined on the ground.

2. They ate for three days
The festivities went on for three days, according to primary accounts. The nearest village of native Wampanoag people traveled on foot for about two days to attend, Wall said. “It takes so long to get somewhere, that once you get there you stay a while,” she said.

3. Deer topped the menu
Venison headlined the meal, although there was a healthy selection of fowl and fish, according to the Pilgrim Hall Museum, which cited writings by Plymouth leaders Edward Winslow and William Bradford. There was a “great store of wild turkeys” to be eaten, as well as ducks and geese, wrote Bradford, who was the governor. Winslow said Massasoit, the leader of the Wampanoag people, contributed five deer to the dinner.

4. It wasn’t called Thanksgiving
There’s no evidence that the 1621 feast was called Thanksgiving, and the event was not repeated for at least a decade, experts say. Still, it is said to be the inspiration behind the now traditional annual gathering and a testament to the cooperation of two groups of people. It showed “two communities that are diplomatically connected coming together,” said Richard Pickering, Plimoth Plantation’s deputy executive director. Abraham Lincoln officially declared Thanksgiving a national holiday by proclamation in 1863.

5. The peace was short-lived
Early European colonizers and Native Americans lived in peace through a symbiotic relationship for about 10 years until thousands of additional settlers arrived, Pickering said. Up to 25,000 Englishmen landed in the New World between 1630 and 1642, after a plague drastically cut the native population by what's believed to be more than half, he said.

From a MA guys @pcgeek11 is kind of correct. They more or less shared food and the Indians gave them some assistance with seeds and planting stuff, so the Indians were very nice and definitely helped out a lot but the colony wasn't completely starving either (this term is up to interpretation)