This superpi Barcy pic may be fake, but if its not

[classy]

its pretty damn fast
On the first post click on the pconline link. For some reason it won't link right.
I looked over the same thread that posted the earlier Barcy superpi marks and I noticed the pics were gone. While looking through I came across this post here. I click on the pconlne link and it took to me that screen shot. If thats the case, that is some crazy speed for only 2g.

Drop this in front of http://
img.pconline.com.cn/images/bbs4/20079/2/1188748347334.jpg

 

[nonameo]

that's @ 1.8, not 2.

 

[Quiksilver]

Did you even click on that link he provided? It isn't at 1.8, its 2.01

 

[Accord99]

It's faked, the checksum is wrong.

 

[Keysplayr]

Originally posted by: Accord99
It's faked, the checksum is wrong.

You're certain?

 

[Accord99]

You can check it:

http://www.xtremesystems.com/pi/

The faker didn't really try, he just changed the seconds portion of each iteration's time and didn't bother to change the checksum of the original SuperPi run, which is still available here:

http://www.hardspell.com/pic/p...-8eb1-b1e5a1942810.jpg

 

[cmrmrc]

it amazes me how coincidental all the decimals of the pi benchmark finish by 0.266s

 

[Markfw]

I can do im in 17 seconds @ 3150, so 32 seconds is almost twice mine, so it seems right in line with Conroe.

 

[Keysplayr]

Originally posted by: Accord99
You can check it:

http://www.xtremesystems.com/pi/

The faker didn't really try, he just changed the seconds portion of each iteration's time and didn't bother to change the checksum of the original SuperPi run, which is still available here:

http://www.hardspell.com/pic/p...-8eb1-b1e5a1942810.jpg

Excellent eye you have there Accord99. Well Done. :thumbsup: