• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

This makes me sick...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
does the UK use MPH ? I thought it was kilometers there too... I see Top Gear says MPH all the time...
 
I like how these articles throw in completely useless tidbits of information. We were taught back in 4th grade not to include facts which don't pertain to the rest of the story.

Read:

"The officer, who is also trained in the use of firearms, was recorded travelling at 159mph on the motorway near Telford in the early hours of 5 December 2003."

What does being trained in firearms have anything to do with a story about driving fast? If it were a story about a cop involved in a firearm incident I'd understand. They might as well write, "The officer, who owns a pet golden retriever, was recorded travelling at 159mph on the motorway near Telford in the early hours of 5 December 2003.". Or better yet, "The officer, who had beef stew for dinner last night and likes hamsters, was recorded travelling at 159mph on the motorway near Telford in the early hours of 5 December 2003."
 
Anyone who is complaining about the cop going fast is just jealous they can't get away with it.

If you want to be able to speed that badly, goto school and become a police officer yourself!
 
Originally posted by: Ime
Anyone who is complaining about the cop going fast is just jealous they can't get away with it.

If you want to be able to speed that badly, goto school and become a police officer yourself!


I've gone faster than that plenty of times. It was kind of pointless and I refrain from doing it anymore, but I was curious.
 
Originally posted by: rh71
does the UK use MPH ? I thought it was kilometers there too... I see Top Gear says MPH all the time...

No, we use Miles Per Hour, because the cost of replacing all of the road signs in the United Kingdom was deemed too expensive.
 
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Ime
Anyone who is complaining about the cop going fast is just jealous they can't get away with it.

If you want to be able to speed that badly, goto school and become a police officer yourself!


I've gone faster than that plenty of times. It was kind of pointless and I refrain from doing it anymore, but I was curious.

I go faster than that at least 2x a week...
and I love it..
Speed is better than a drug...
 
Originally posted by: piroroadkill
Originally posted by: rh71
does the UK use MPH ? I thought it was kilometers there too... I see Top Gear says MPH all the time...

No, we use Miles Per Hour, because the cost of replacing all of the road signs in the United Kingdom was deemed too expensive.

No, we use MPH because, we use MPH.
 
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Ime
Anyone who is complaining about the cop going fast is just jealous they can't get away with it.

If you want to be able to speed that badly, goto school and become a police officer yourself!


I've gone faster than that plenty of times. It was kind of pointless and I refrain from doing it anymore, but I was curious.

I go faster than that at least 2x a week...
and I love it..
Speed is better than a drug...
Make sure you sign the back of your license to be a organ donor.
 
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
I like how these articles throw in completely useless tidbits of information. We were taught back in 4th grade not to include facts which don't pertain to the rest of the story.

Read:

"The officer, who is also trained in the use of firearms, was recorded travelling at 159mph on the motorway near Telford in the early hours of 5 December 2003."

What does being trained in firearms have anything to do with a story about driving fast? If it were a story about a cop involved in a firearm incident I'd understand. They might as well write, "The officer, who owns a pet golden retriever, was recorded travelling at 159mph on the motorway near Telford in the early hours of 5 December 2003.". Or better yet, "The officer, who had beef stew for dinner last night and likes hamsters, was recorded travelling at 159mph on the motorway near Telford in the early hours of 5 December 2003."


I was going to post the same thing, then realized they were talking about England where not all cops carry firearms. It is still not relevant, but at least the people wondering "hey i wonder if this cop was trained in firearms too" have their answer!
 
Originally posted by: PaulNEPats
This is the type of crap that makes the public (no matter what country) not trust the police.
QFT

"All men are created equal" my a$$! :roll:
 
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
I like how these articles throw in completely useless tidbits of information. We were taught back in 4th grade not to include facts which don't pertain to the rest of the story.

Read:

"The officer, who is also trained in the use of firearms, was recorded travelling at 159mph on the motorway near Telford in the early hours of 5 December 2003."

What does being trained in firearms have anything to do with a story about driving fast? If it were a story about a cop involved in a firearm incident I'd understand. They might as well write, "The officer, who owns a pet golden retriever, was recorded travelling at 159mph on the motorway near Telford in the early hours of 5 December 2003.". Or better yet, "The officer, who had beef stew for dinner last night and likes hamsters, was recorded travelling at 159mph on the motorway near Telford in the early hours of 5 December 2003."


I wondered that as well. I felt as though it was included to somehow make him seem more dangerous (but I have no idea whether an English person would view it that way - I know most Americans wouldn't).

 
Originally posted by: moshquerade
my brother has a badge. once you have one all of these guys call you brother.
they're "family".

You're forgetting the months it takes to be accepted as a brother after you get the badge. There's no immediate acceptance.

Originally posted by: cerebusPu
the police force is just one giant fraternity.

The Fraternal order of the police

Not every Officer is necessarily a member of the FOP.

Originally posted by: slycat
they're called pigs for a reason u know?

Yeah, that reason is that hippies in the 60s thought the police looked like pigs when they had their gas masks on as riots were doused with tear gas. How is that relevant?
 
Originally posted by: DonVito
I wondered that as well. I felt as though it was included to somehow make him seem more dangerous (but I have no idea whether an English person would view it that way - I know most Americans wouldn't).

It's probably meant to show he's an otherwise exemplary officer, as not everyone is trained in firearms over there.
 
Back
Top