This is the filth that is Jr.

[Hayabusa Rider]

Should he just post a photo of his ass then? I'm thinking this might be where he pulled it out of...

It's entirely possible that I might not be fully informed so it seemed best to all for a potential truth to become known. Couldn't hurt, eh?

 

[dphantom]

I would like to see an explicit statement from an official verifying your claim. This is from a Fox News article:

"Feinstein tweeted late Sunday that she agreed with Flake that the committee vote should be delayed. "There's a lot of information we don't know and the FBI should have the time it needs to review this new material," she wrote. "Staff calls aren't the appropriate way to handle this."

Now that's curious. Feinstein has made a direct comment about the FBI and one would think that Fox at the very least would mention that the FBI has declined to pursue this fatuous allegation.

That would be a very serious gaffe on Feinstein's part to say the FBI needs time for something they refuse to take seriously.

Perhaps you can enlighten us with credible sources that support your post?

https://www.westernjournal.com/democrats-send-secret-letter-kavanaugh-fbi/
In a statement on Thursday, the FBI said it has received Feinstein’s referral and included the letter in Kavanaugh’s background check file.

The Hill reported that a bureau official confirmed no criminal investigation has been opened into the matter.

https://www.npr.org/2018/09/14/6478...ation-of-sexual-misconduct-during-high-school
A spokesperson for the FBI said when the letter was received from Feinstein it was incorporated into that file.

"Upon receipt of the information on the night of September 12, we included it as part of Judge Kavanaugh's background file, as per the standard process."

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

https://www.westernjournal.com/democrats-send-secret-letter-kavanaugh-fbi/
In a statement on Thursday, the FBI said it has received Feinstein’s referral and included the letter in Kavanaugh’s background check file.

The Hill reported that a bureau official confirmed no criminal investigation has been opened into the matter.

https://www.npr.org/2018/09/14/6478...ation-of-sexual-misconduct-during-high-school
A spokesperson for the FBI said when the letter was received from Feinstein it was incorporated into that file.

"Upon receipt of the information on the night of September 12, we included it as part of Judge Kavanaugh's background file, as per the standard process."

What you mentioned was quite specific, that the FBI

has declined to pursue this fatuous allegation.

That's not there in what you quoted. No criminal investigation has been opened and the file was attached to Kavanaugh's file.

If you note I didn't mention that the FBI is actively pursuing anything. I have referenced that Feinstein referred it to them. They have declined nothing, an affirmative statement on your part. Will they? Well I don't know and neither do you nor anyone here. What we do know is that there is nothing out there you've found that mentions declining or pursuing anything.

You haven't a demonstrable hook on which to hang your hat, so to speak.

 

[soundforbjt]

Wow, Jr. Mint is an asshole just like his dad...who'da thunk?

 

[dphantom]

What you mentioned was quite specific, that the FBI


That's not there in what you quoted. No criminal investigation has been opened and the file was attached to Kavanaugh's file.

If you note I didn't mention that the FBI is actively pursuing anything. I have referenced that Feinstein referred it to them. They have declined nothing, an affirmative statement on your part. Will they? Well I don't know and neither do you nor anyone here. What we do know is that there is nothing out there you've found that mentions declining or pursuing anything.

You haven't a demonstrable hook on which to hang your hat, so to speak.

Seems to me if the FBI is not opening a criminal investigation into a potentially criminal matter they are then not pursuing the libel by this so called woman. At least for now.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

What is wrong with mocking lies?

You know it's a lie? How do you know that?

 

[paperfist]

The Republican party has become the glorification of human indecency. They serve the Beast.

And Democrats don’t cheat on their wives or lie or do anything else indecent....

 

[brycejones]

Seems to me if the FBI is not opening a criminal investigation into a potentially criminal matter they are then not pursuing the libel by this so called woman. At least for now.

Why would the FBI open a criminal investigation for acts that are long past the statute of limitations? If they did you would be bitching about them wasting money to investigate an unprosecutable crime.

BTW the word you are looking for is slander not libel.

So called woman? Is there some rumor in retard land that the woman who has come forward isn't a woman?

 

[Muse]

It's simply a last gasp political play to thwart his ascension to the High Court. Nothing more. The lady will soon fade into obscurity as she should. The FBI has already done a number (5-6??) background checks and has declined to pursue this fatuous allegation.

You are full of shit, pure and simple.

 

[Indus]

And Democrats don’t cheat on their wives or lie or do anything else indecent....

Except the wives can divorce. There is no divorce from a lifetime appointment on the highest court in the land.

 

[zerocool84]

And Democrats don’t cheat on their wives or lie or do anything else indecent....

And yet only one party calls themselves the "Moral Majority" yet they consistently show they are anything but moral.

Republicans are always showing how little they care about following their Christian religion teachings.

 

[paperfist]

Except the wives can divorce. There is no divorce from a lifetime appointment on the highest court in the land.

And yet only one party calls themselves the "Moral Majority" yet they consistently show they are anything but moral.

Republicans are always showing how little they care about following their Christian religion teachings.

Sorry fellas there’s no winning on either side. Moral corruption is deeply rooted in both parties.

 

[Moonbeam]

And Democrats don’t cheat on their wives or lie or do anything else indecent....

Of course some do. But you are far more more morally corrupt to say both parties are equally corrupt. Republicans worship the Beast. That’s not the same as saying there are some morally flawed people who are Democrats. The Republican Party is a party that honors andworships moral disease. You know that you both-sides silly hypocrite. Trump is a human pig. He shouts OK to being morally sick. Walk away from it. Because you are a brainwashed member of a cult was not something you had a choice about. You had no choice but to worship evil and that makes you do evil but you can lay it down recover your true grace and walk away. You hate evil, but to me it’s just a state of unnecessary blindness. We have already been forgiven except by ourselves. I wish you luck.

 

[Moonbeam]

You are full of shit, pure and simple.

This is just so obviously true but I bet he doesn’t see it.

 

[Vic]

Sorry fellas there’s no winning on either side. Moral corruption is deeply rooted in both parties.

Why is it that a lack of morality in either party somehow infuses your party with moral superiority?
Sorry, fella, you don't get to throw stones from your glass house without others throwing back. Deal with it.

 

[Muse]

This is just so obviously true but I bet he doesn’t see it.

Ah, but I at least called him out. Lies, prevarication must be blottoed.

 

[dphantom]

Why would the FBI open a criminal investigation for acts that are long past the statute of limitations? If they did you would be bitching about them wasting money to investigate an unprosecutable crime.

BTW the word you are looking for is slander not libel.

So called woman? Is there some rumor in retard land that the woman who has come forward isn't a woman?

I think libel is correct. I was referring to the letter sent to Feinstein. And, yes, the statute of limitation is long past, you are correct.

"Slander involves the oral "publication" of a defamatory remark that is heard by another, which injures the subject's reputation or character. Slander can occur through the use of a hand gesture or verbal communication that is not recorded. Libel, on the other hand, is the written "publication" of a defamatory remark that has the tendency to injure another's reputation or character. Libel also includes a publication on radio, audio or video."

 

[fskimospy]

I think libel is correct. I was referring to the letter sent to Feinstein. And, yes, the statute of limitation is long past, you are correct.

"Slander involves the oral "publication" of a defamatory remark that is heard by another, which injures the subject's reputation or character. Slander can occur through the use of a hand gesture or verbal communication that is not recorded. Libel, on the other hand, is the written "publication" of a defamatory remark that has the tendency to injure another's reputation or character. Libel also includes a publication on radio, audio or video."

What was your basis for determining that this allegation is false?

 

[dphantom]

What was your basis for determining that this allegation is false?

What is your basis for not rejecting it as false when 65 other women contemporaneously (and to this day) support Kavanaugh?

 

[fskimospy]

What is your basis for not rejecting it as false when 65 other women contemporaneously (and to this day) support Kavanaugh?

Why would they know anything about the events of that night?

Again, what is your basis?

 

[woolfe9998]

What is your basis for not rejecting it as false when 65 other women contemporaneously (and to this day) support Kavanaugh?

What is your basis for rejecting it when 29 people who went to school with her sent a letter to the Senate vouching for her truthfulness?

In all seriousness, character witnesses have at best slight value in getting at the truth. If you try to rape one woman, the fact that by age 53 you have known at least 65 others who you didn't try to rape is pretty meaningless. No one is suggesting he tried to rape every woman he ever met. No one is suggesting he tried to rape more than one.

 

[paperfist]

Of course some do. But you are far more more morally corrupt to say both parties are equally corrupt. Republicans worship the Beast. That’s not the same as saying there are some morally flawed people who are Democrats. The Republican Party is a party that honors andworships moral disease. You know that you both-sides silly hypocrite. Trump is a human pig. He shouts OK to being morally sick. Walk away from it. Because you are a brainwashed member of a cult was not something you had a choice about. You had no choice but to worship evil and that makes you do evil but you can lay it down recover your true grace and walk away. You hate evil, but to me it’s just a state of unnecessary blindness. We have already been forgiven except by ourselves. I wish you luck.

Do you actually believe that? You’ve bought into this good vrs evil way to much. Neither party has your best interest in at heart.

Trump is such as vile and wretched beast yet he still is leader of the United States. You must ask yourself if you believe that to be true how your party of righteous allows him to lead...

Why is it that a lack of morality in either party somehow infuses your party with moral superiority?
Sorry, fella, you don't get to throw stones from your glass house without others throwing back. Deal with it.

It seems to be common practice to lump one or two bad apples into a heard. It’s almost as if you guys are tone deaf to your own party’s transgressions.

Your party should be dealing with this, not me. No one does anything though so nothing must be wrong, right?

 

[UNCjigga]

Wow, no mention of Jr's Anderson Cooper hurricane dig and Cooper's epic takedown of Jr.??

https://youtu.be/tQEtXWdID0k

 

[dphantom]

Why would they know anything about the events of that night?

Again, what is your basis?

Again, what is your basis for not rejecting it when 2 people who have direct knowledge of the non-events of that night are at opposite pole of one who believes there was some event that night?

 

[fskimospy]

Again, what is your basis for not rejecting it when 2 people who have direct knowledge of the non-events of that night are at opposite pole of one who believes there was some event that night?

Your argument has been reduced to ‘the alleged criminal and his buddy said he didn’t do it so that’s that.’

Lol.