Most here know I recommend the book "The Shock Doctrine" for a number of things it has to say. Its central point is how people in power who want to do unpopular things sneak them in in time of crisis.
It's one of those things most have never notice, they aren't aware there are people who do this, but when someone explains it, and presents many examples, it's a good political technique to learn it done.
It also exposes some of the ruthlessness behind the people who often do it - for the bases of motives, to spread policies of greed for the few by impoverishing the many. It might even push someone more lberal.
So, it gets discussed in history - with a recent example being Katrina, when a massive right-wing agenda was pushed during the crisis, much of which was adopted.
I've long said right-wing 'think tanks', appropriately a dishonest and misleading name, are basically entities whose function is to 'sell rightwing-policies benefitting the rich', with propaganda mostly.
Not surprisingly, they're just the groups to have unpopular policies of greed just waiting for crises in which to use the Shock Doctrine.
Now we have Haiti. And yes, it's started.
This isn't the best example, in that it's such an incredibly poor nation there's not much money at stake, but that doesn't stop it. Watch it happen.
It sounds so innocuous - everyone agrees Haiti is a disaster, so make some general references to 'this being a good chance to help the dsfunctional government' that are very agreeable.
But put the right-wing agenda as the actual plan.
Here's a link with Naomi Klein, the author of the book, noting the Heritage Foundation raising its head for the Haiti crisis.
Long after the fact, we might look back and criticize their policy. Now, it's easy to go with. It's a crisis. People say they hate 'politicizing a crisis', but will they really be upset over this 'shock doctrine' activity?
http://www.commondreams.org/further/2010/01/14-1
Check the Katrina history on her web site for better documentation about this being done.
It's one of those things most have never notice, they aren't aware there are people who do this, but when someone explains it, and presents many examples, it's a good political technique to learn it done.
It also exposes some of the ruthlessness behind the people who often do it - for the bases of motives, to spread policies of greed for the few by impoverishing the many. It might even push someone more lberal.
So, it gets discussed in history - with a recent example being Katrina, when a massive right-wing agenda was pushed during the crisis, much of which was adopted.
I've long said right-wing 'think tanks', appropriately a dishonest and misleading name, are basically entities whose function is to 'sell rightwing-policies benefitting the rich', with propaganda mostly.
Not surprisingly, they're just the groups to have unpopular policies of greed just waiting for crises in which to use the Shock Doctrine.
Now we have Haiti. And yes, it's started.
This isn't the best example, in that it's such an incredibly poor nation there's not much money at stake, but that doesn't stop it. Watch it happen.
It sounds so innocuous - everyone agrees Haiti is a disaster, so make some general references to 'this being a good chance to help the dsfunctional government' that are very agreeable.
But put the right-wing agenda as the actual plan.
Here's a link with Naomi Klein, the author of the book, noting the Heritage Foundation raising its head for the Haiti crisis.
Long after the fact, we might look back and criticize their policy. Now, it's easy to go with. It's a crisis. People say they hate 'politicizing a crisis', but will they really be upset over this 'shock doctrine' activity?
http://www.commondreams.org/further/2010/01/14-1
Check the Katrina history on her web site for better documentation about this being done.