This is BS ... gas prices are high because the companies are GREEDY!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: junkerman123
capitalism requires competition, an oligopoly is prectically the same thing as a monopoly, aka bad

why is a monopoly 'bad'?
and how is an oligopoly practically the same thing?
it seems you don't know much about economics

maybe he wants to hand it over to the government
 

Freejack2

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2000
7,751
8
91
We don't just rely on oil for fuel. Plastics, medicines, you name it, all require petroleum products.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,778
48,463
136
Originally posted by: Ilmater
Originally posted by: purbeast0
Text

So if what I'm reading here is correct (sorry, i haven't been following the reasons for the high prices), the reason gas is supposed to be costing more now is because the companies are supposed to be using the extra $ to dig and find new resources, however according to this article it seems the companies just have all this extra $ sitting around because we are paying more for gas?

That is such BS!

:thumbsdown:

but it sucks because I need gas to get to work every day :(
I don't want to hear another word out of ANY of you until you've read this:

Peak Oil: Life After the Oil Crash

If you know anything about economics, you'll know how correct this is.

Ugh, not that POS again.

My bigget peve about that is how hydogen is completely dismissed as an alternative because a total solution using it is not available right off the shelf at this percise instant in time and is thus worthless.

Much of his information saying how nuclear power is not a viable option for hydogen production is misleading or flat out wrong.

 

Ilmater

Diamond Member
Jun 13, 2002
7,516
1
0
Originally posted by: Argo
But isn't that the whole point of capitalism? Again, things like that have a way of fixing themselves. Eventually enough people will switch to hybrids driving the oil consumption down. I bet people were bitching about coal industry in the 20s.
Right, hybrids are just flying off the shelves aren't they?! Again, read the article above.
 

Ilmater

Diamond Member
Jun 13, 2002
7,516
1
0
Originally posted by: junkerman123
I've seen that site, that man is an idiot. Continuing....
I'll grant that there are some misleading things there, but most of that is true, and very accurate.
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
63,515
19,921
136
Originally posted by: Jzero
God forbid a person/company selling a product try to maximize profits!

There's a fine line between maximizing profits and gouging.
Not that I'm siding with one group or the other here.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Jzero
God forbid a person/company selling a product try to maximize profits!

There's a fine line between maximizing profits and gouging.
Not that I'm siding with one group or the other here.

I'm not even going to try and pretend I have a basic concept of the accounting/economics of the oil industry. Because I really, really don't.

But for any industry, is it a crime for them to try and maintain a static profit margin over what it costs them for their raw product?

If it costs McDonald's $1.00 to make a $2.00 Sandwich, and the food cost goes up and it now costs them $1.50 to make that sandwhich, should they be forced to suck it up and just eat that loss what was profit? Or do you consider it fair to mark up the price so that they maintain their original profit margin?

Or how about GM? If it used to cost them $2,500 to make a car in 1965 and they only made $250 off of it, is it really wrong of them to make $2500 off of a $25,000 vehicle?
 

mercanucaribe

Banned
Oct 20, 2004
9,763
1
0
I'll never understand the people who push for temporary decreases in gas prices, and believe me they will be temporary. China's and India's oil demand will skyrocket, and prices will continue to rise. There is no wisdom in ameliorating that rise in the short term, because that will only cause it to hit us harder later.
 

Argo

Lifer
Apr 8, 2000
10,045
0
0
Originally posted by: Ilmater
Originally posted by: Argo
But isn't that the whole point of capitalism? Again, things like that have a way of fixing themselves. Eventually enough people will switch to hybrids driving the oil consumption down. I bet people were bitching about coal industry in the 20s.
Right, hybrids are just flying off the shelves aren't they?! Again, read the article above.

When the oil prices hit $4 or $5 per gallon they'll start flying off the shelves. Why do you think smart companies like Toyota are burning so much money on hybrid development?
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
63,515
19,921
136
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Jzero
God forbid a person/company selling a product try to maximize profits!

There's a fine line between maximizing profits and gouging.
Not that I'm siding with one group or the other here.

I'm not even going to try and pretend I have a basic concept of the accounting/economics of the oil industry. Because I really, really don't.

But for any industry, is it a crime for them to try and maintain a static profit margin over what it costs them for their raw product?

If it costs McDonald's $1.00 to make a $2.00 Sandwich, and the food cost goes up and it now costs them $1.50 to make that sandwhich, should they be forced to suck it up and just eat that loss what was profit? Or do you consider it fair to mark up the price so that they maintain their original profit margin?

Or how about GM? If it used to cost them $2,500 to make a car in 1965 and they only made $250 off of it, is it really wrong of them to make $2500 off of a $25,000 vehicle?

That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying there's a fine line between maximizing profits and gouging. I'm not making a statement about any company, just a general observation.
 

rahvin

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,475
1
0
Originally posted by: junkerman123
Originally posted by: Argo
Originally posted by: junkerman123
Govn't regulation needs to come in and take care of this oligoploy IMO.

Why?

B/c the oil companies can essentially set whatever price they want for gas...and since everyone is so dependent on it there is nothing the consumer will do. since there are only like 4 or 5 major oil companies in the US, this is an oligopoly. If the government cared about the consumer instead of letting oil companies rake in almost a hundred billion dollars in profit every year, they would do something. Emphasis on IF :)

Have you ever heard of a company called Stanard Oil?
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,407
8,595
126
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Jzero
God forbid a person/company selling a product try to maximize profits!

There's a fine line between maximizing profits and gouging.
Not that I'm siding with one group or the other here.

please post an economics definition of 'gouging'
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,522
20,161
146
When will simplistic morons stop reading this anti-corporate drivel and realize that OIL IS A COMMODITY. It's price is set by the market, which, for the most part, is controlled by OPEC.

Oil companies make more money when oil prices are high because their profit margins increase. Just like any other company that deals with a commodity.