Imagine if there hadn't been a security camera. This innocent guy would be screwed, because an accused rapist is equal to being a rapist according to some of the apologists around here.
No he wouldn't because she wouldn't be able to prove that a rape actually occurred.
Rape convictions are very low.
Most cases are settled before trial so I disagree.
She should have claimed acquaintance rape. Absolutely impossible to disprove without a sex tape.
It's different because people wrongfully convicted don't get raped in their... oh. Nevermind.In a practical sense how is that different than a man attempting to kidnap a woman and hold her prisoner in his basement dungeon?
If you were given the choice of being raped or falsely accused of raping someone else, which one would you choose?
Most cases are settled before trial so I disagree.
early 90,000 people reported being raped in the United States in 2008. There is an arrest rate of 25%.
still as dense as a post, eh?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_the_United_States
With an arrest rate of only 25% I don't see how anyone can claim that 'most' cases are settled before trial.
There should be some kind of punishment for this sort of thing but those trying to say that false accusations of rape are as bad as actual rape are off their rocker.
No, I'd say their pretty close, true that having sex forced upon you would be a nightmare but so would be facing those charges if she could get her ploy to work, dude would be in jail for 5-10 years, be financially ruined an be unemployable once he got out of jail since EVERY employer runs a criminal background check on a prospective employee's.
They aren't close at all and anyone who suggests otherwise is emotionally stunted.
