This book's for you Moonbeam

[UltraQuiet]

Moonbeam's Hero

Enjoy.


Dave

 

[roncarter]

Originally posted by: DaveSohmer
Moonbeam's Hero

Enjoy.


Dave

cooolll

 

[thebestMAX]

How is this his favorite??? Didnt see one mention of "sloppy seconds"

Kathy does look hot though!

 

[PsychoAndy]

Originally posted by: thebestMAX
How is this his favorite??? Didnt see one mention of "sloppy seconds"

Kathy does look hot though!

Are you getting senile in your old age?

The only way i'd hit her is if it was with a 2 by 4.

-PAB

 

[Moonbeam]

The article does a fair job of covering the relative details on both sides. If Gore had gotten the recount he petitioned for he probably would have lost, is what the consortium recount showed. This article doesn't mention, however, that if Bush had gotten the recount he counter-demanded Bush would have lost. There is also, of course, a certain convergence of law and bias is Harris' case. Both sides used or were plagued by the time limit. Gore chose a limited recount because of it, which was wrong, and Bush chose a full recount which was right, but which he knew he would loose but was conveniently impossible time wise to complete anyway . But regardless of motive and alibi, the full accurate statewide recount that should have been done then and was completed only many months later by a consortium of papers, showed Gore the plurality winner, and was then downplayed to make it look like Bush, in the midst of 9/11 actually won. The facts are that everything the Republicans and their supporters did was to make sure the votes were not counted while they shouted over and over about the fiction that they were counted again and again.

You don't ask five biased jokers to put you in office because you're in a hurry. The time limit should have been what was illegal. We elect people by what's in the ballot boxes, not how well you can tie up the recount with court actions till the buzzer rings. There was only one reason the Republicans didn't want those votes recounted. Governor Bush promised Florida to GW and the actual count didn't cooperate. Having to adjust an artificial time limit would have been much preferable over having the Supreme court flip flop on states rights and perform a coup. Day by day we see better and better what a huge catastrophe that was. We maybe need to add an IQ floor to the 35 and a born citizen restrictions for the office. The guy is an embarrassment to our people and in the eyes of the world.

 

[Moonbeam]

Pshcho, MAX is just tickled that he got in line here ahead of me, greasing my path, as it were.

PS see the lubrication thread for full comprehension.

 

[rbhawcroft]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Pshcho, MAX is just tickled that he got in line here ahead of me, greasing my path, as it were. PS see the lubrication thread for full comprehension.

id milf her.

 

[thebestMAX]

Psycho Andy-

See Red Dawns post in my sig!

<<Are you getting senile in your old age?

The only way i'd hit her is if it was with a 2 by 4.>>

Met her a few years ago and believe me, I would have. Of course more mature, powerful women usually do appeal to more mature, competent men.

Not a put down, just wait till you are older.

 

[UltraQuiet]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
The article does a fair job of covering the relative details on both sides. If Gore had gotten the recount he petitioned for he probably would have lost, is what the consortium recount showed. This article doesn't mention, however, that if Bush had gotten the recount he counter-demanded Bush would have lost. There is also, of course, a certain convergence of law and bias is Harris' case. Both sides used or were plagued by the time limit. Gore chose a limited recount because of it, which was wrong, and Bush chose a full recount which was right, but which he knew he would loose but was conveniently impossible time wise to complete anyway . But regardless of motive and alibi, the full accurate statewide recount that should have been done then and was completed only many months later by a consortium of papers, showed Gore the plurality winner, and was then downplayed to make it look like Bush, in the midst of 9/11 actually won. The facts are that everything the Republicans and their supporters did was to make sure the votes were not counted while they shouted over and over about the fiction that they were counted again and again.

You don't ask five biased jokers to put you in office because you're in a hurry. The time limit should have been what was illegal. We elect people by what's in the ballot boxes, not how well you can tie up the recount with court actions till the buzzer rings. There was only one reason the Republicans didn't want those votes recounted. Governor Bush promised Florida to GW and the actual count didn't cooperate. Having to adjust an artificial time limit would have been much preferable over having the Supreme court flip flop on states rights and perform a coup. Day by day we see better and better what a huge catastrophe that was. We maybe need to add an IQ floor to the 35 and a born citizen restrictions for the office. The guy is an embarrassment to our people and in the eyes of the world.

I knew you'd like it.

BTW I'm not at all embarassed although I do occasionally cringe.

 

[thebestMAX]

<<Pshcho, MAX is just tickled that he got in line here ahead of me, greasing my path, as it were. >>

Greasing your path, Haw Haw.



If so, how come you didnt answer me in the "Lubrication thread"?

Love ya anyway, bud!

 

[CPA]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
The article does a fair job of covering the relative details on both sides. If Gore had gotten the recount he petitioned for he probably would have lost, is what the consortium recount showed. This article doesn't mention, however, that if Bush had gotten the recount he counter-demanded Bush would have lost. There is also, of course, a certain convergence of law and bias is Harris' case. Both sides used or were plagued by the time limit. Gore chose a limited recount because of it, which was wrong, and Bush chose a full recount which was right, but which he knew he would loose but was conveniently impossible time wise to complete anyway . But regardless of motive and alibi, the full accurate statewide recount that should have been done then and was completed only many months later by a consortium of papers, showed Gore the plurality winner, and was then downplayed to make it look like Bush, in the midst of 9/11 actually won. The facts are that everything the Republicans and their supporters did was to make sure the votes were not counted while they shouted over and over about the fiction that they were counted again and again.

You don't ask five biased jokers to put you in office because you're in a hurry. The time limit should have been what was illegal. We elect people by what's in the ballot boxes, not how well you can tie up the recount with court actions till the buzzer rings. There was only one reason the Republicans didn't want those votes recounted. Governor Bush promised Florida to GW and the actual count didn't cooperate. Having to adjust an artificial time limit would have been much preferable over having the Supreme court flip flop on states rights and perform a coup. Day by day we see better and better what a huge catastrophe that was. We maybe need to add an IQ floor to the 35 and a born citizen restrictions for the office. The guy is an embarrassment to our people and in the eyes of the world.

Wrong Moonbeam, many full recounts done afterwards showed Bush won, plain and simple. Ask USAToday, New York Times and Washington Post, all of which did full recounts, all of which declared Bush the winner.

 

[Moonbeam]

thebest, the only question I say I thought you were answering in the next line. Did I miss something. If so don't hesitate to say. It might be a good excuse to give myself a spanking.

Dave, you're not embarrassed yet.

I guess I'm not either, but maybe for different reasons. I voted and not for him. And there's plenty of other stuff to be proud of here.

 

[Miramonti]

She's a crook. Proceeds from the book should go to the victims.

 

[Moonbeam]

CPA, thanks for straightening me out. For a minute there I got really upset. ( Insert on of those rollie eye things here I don't know how to make )

 

[thebestMAX]

<<thebest, the only question I say I thought you were answering in the next line. Did I miss something. If so don't hesitate to say. It might be a good excuse to give myself a spanking. >>

Incomprehensible as usual, wait just let me take a toke of this and maybe I will understand.

 

[Tripleshot]

Bush's final victory margin, which Harris certified, was 537 votes -- out of more than 6 million cast.

Wow! Now thats a moral victory, isn't it? After reading the article, and reflecting on the garbage that went on then, add Enron and Harkin, a pathetic economy, pronisies broken on things he campaigned for, the road to a second term looks filled with potholes that you could sink a battleship in.


But, if he can skirt law on these things, and skirt congress by declaring war on Iraq, no telling what the sheep in this country will settle for. He just might get elected because people are fed up with the sleeze that goes with politics, and Bush is just as bad as his predisessor. The country is running out of options. Hell, I'ld vote for Nader before I'ld vote for Bush (but you people knew that already,didn't you?
)

 

[Moonbeam]

Tripleshot, you don't sound embarrassed. You sound kind of mad.

thebest, yep, I screwed up again. The y is say should have been a w. I figured you meant by 'why didn't I answer you in the lube thread' that you had asked me a question so I checked back and only saw one question which I thought you were quoting from somebody else and then answering in the next line. Otherwise, probably I just didn't think of anything smart assed to say.