Thinking about the P4X400...

Jul 1, 2000
10,274
2
0
Anybody use one of these boards yet? Wanna talk me out of it?

Every review I have read said that it performs admirably well and is wicked fast. :D For $100, how could I go wrong ;)
 

nightowl

Golden Member
Oct 12, 2000
1,935
0
0
I think your biggest problem is going to be finding one for sale. Most companies are not making boards with the chipset because VIA does not have a license to make a P4 chipset. Also, next to no one is carrying any of the boards that are being made.
 

Lecho

Member
Dec 1, 2000
156
0
0
Your best bet with P4X400 would probably be VIA's own board, the P4PB400, it retails for about $125, and it seems to be very stable and fast, but only while running DDR333.
 

Vette73

Lifer
Jul 5, 2000
21,503
9
0
Originally posted by: Lecho
Your best bet with P4X400 would probably be VIA's own board, the P4PB400, it retails for about $125, and it seems to be very stable and fast, but only while running DDR333.

There is also the Soltek. It has the 6ch sound, USB2.0, and Lan option for only $100 plus shipping, that and its a cool white color :)
2 vendors have the non Lan version, while one has the Lan version, even though they are the same price ?


Here ya go, CLICK ME

But I say go for it. I think there is more demand for it, but with aBit and Asus not using it yet, that is holding them back.
 

oldfart

Lifer
Dec 2, 1999
10,207
0
0
Anandtech:
However, some problems cropped up once we started testing DDR400 memory. First off, one of the 3 DIMM slots was completely unable to operate DDR400; it wouldn't even boot into Windows XP. We don?t know the exact cause for this malfunction, but we are working with VIA to pinpoint the issue.

Despite this anomaly, we were able to operate the DDR400 memory in the other two DIMM slots available on the P4PB 400. With DDR400 in either of the two slots, we were able to boot into Windows XP and run some of the stress tests and benchmarks we needed for DDR400 scores. Unfortunately, the P4PB 400 failed to complete SYSMark 2002 among other benchmarks, even after several tries. But even though the DDR400 memory was mostly operational using the 2 other slots, it definitely wasn't as trouble free as we would have preferred (random crashes and reboots galore).
THG:
About two weeks ago, we had planned to test the VIA P4X400 chipset, which is also supposed to support DDR400. However, during the test, problems emerged with a memory clock of 200 MHz: even in the slowest CL3 mode, the P4X400 board was not able to boot, and the system hung with the port 80 error "C1" (memory error). So we weren't able to test the P4X400 at 200 MHz memory clock (DDR400). The Soltek SL-85ERV brings us new hope, and we expect to take a close look at it in one of the up-coming tests.
xbitlabs:
Anyway, the P4PB 400 mainboard disappointed me with its unstable operation with DDR400 memory. Moreover, with default settings P4PB 400 performed worse with DDR400 than with DDR333. And this situation is very hard to change for the better even during fine tuning. VIA comments on this as follows: "As DDR400 standard is not ratified, we increase the timings greatly to ensure stable work and it inevitably leads to lower performance". Well, quite reasonable, I should say.

The latency measurements show that VIA P4X400 with DDR400 SDRAM will not please us with good results. Memory subsystem latency is greatly increased in this case and it means that VIA didn't care about optimizing its controller for DDR400. That is, by the way, one more argument proving that VIA P4X333 and P4X400 are one and the same thing.

When encoding video into MPEG-4 format, VIA P4X400 managed to fall behind all its rivals, even those, which worked with slower memory. The only conclusion is that the VIA chipset may hardly be considered able to work with DDR400. Actually the support of this memory type is nothing but a marketing trick.
 
Jul 1, 2000
10,274
2
0
How is the performance with DDR333? I plan on using the Samsung Originals sitting on my desk.

How does this compare to the SiS 648? I am looking for a temporary solution until the dual-channel DDR mobos start to roll out.
 

Asmodean56

Junior Member
Aug 29, 2002
6
0
0
I'm in the same situation as DevilsAdvocate...this chipset interests me quite a bit now that the P4S8X has been delayed. Does anyone have personal experience with the board? Will it run fine if the RAM is only at DDR333?
 

OneOfTheseDays

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2000
7,052
0
0
Prometheus (the overclocking GURU) over at Asusboards.com, has said that Via's own P4X400 board is very good. he has gotten the FSB up to 160 or so and says that it is a decent board. He hasn't fully tested it out though.