• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

THG does another review using SETI

T

titanmiller

Platinum Member
Here

The graph appears to be showing how often such a system will complete a work unit, not how long individual WUs take. How about that Quad Opteron.:Q
 
Wow! some awesome crunching rigs there😀

Wierd! ,I see it says v3.04 text client ,but there's no such thing! its either v3.03 or v3.08
 
THG uses Version 3.04 LOL

a spezial version only for THG..................

and what was said

it is showing results more often thanks to hyperthreading.

and

The graph appears to be showing how often such a system will complete a work unit, not how long individual WUs take. How about that Quad Opteron.

so be patient to the Results there

regards
Sir Ulli

 
Odd, even my P4HT 3GHz with 800MHz FSB running Dual Channel doesn't do a unit in less than 3 hours. Wonder what I'm doing wrong...

I think I'll be setting up CLI again, since it's now secure again, and see if I can't eek out some more performance outta my farm. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: RoninCS
Odd, even my P4HT 3GHz with 800MHz FSB running Dual Channel doesn't do a unit in less than 3 hours. Wonder what I'm doing wrong...

I think I'll be setting up CLI again, since it's now secure again, and see if I can't eek out some more performance outta my farm. 🙂
Click to expand...

Yeah there's definitley something wrong there ,you should be doing them in a shade under 2hrs ,or there abouts.
Are you using the GUI version and showing the graphics?
Btw CLI v3.03 is about 15% faster than CLI v3.08 at most WUs! (& its an easy fix to secure v3.03 CLI🙂)

 
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: titanmiller
How about that Quad Opteron.:Q
Click to expand...

34 minutes per WU? Is that right? OMG!
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's pretty darn nice. That's almost 48 WU per day! 🙂 That is tight.... 🙂

I guess when AMD releases the 'Hammer' it's suppose to be a 64 bit chip like the opteron. That ought to be really instersting to see how that comes about. Also suppose to to be 1 meg of catch... 🙂

Thanks for the link Titanmiller.


Makes me happy to see that my 1800's that are doing 3hour 4 - 10 min WU really are prefroming pretty good... I was always wondering how a 2600 Barton would perfrom... And if it would be worth the extra cash to get one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top