• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

They're remaking True Grit.

SunnyD

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
And Jeff Bridges can't even get the eye patch right. WTF.

250x200_truegrit_081810.jpg


A quick comparison reveals that Wayne and Bridges sport their patches on opposite eyes. The Duke covered his left eye as a nod to his longtime collaborator John Ford, who lost vision in that eye when he removed bandages too soon after a cataract operation. No word on why Bridges decided to cover the other side.
Click to expand...
 
The original is one of the few John Wayne movies that I ever liked. Jeff Bridges better have something more than an imitation to add to the Rooster Cogburn character or audiences will reject this remake.
 
I'll probably go watch it, but Bridges should have at least kept the eye patch the way JW had it.
 
DonaldC said:
Don't know how a remake can outdo the original - guess we'll see.
Click to expand...

The original movie was based on a book. Technically speaking, they are not remaking the original movie. They are going back to the book and doing another adaptation.

John Wayne's True Grit was a great movie however, it wasn't true to the original book. As I understand it, this new version will stay much closer to the book.

Here is quote from a cinematical.com story about it...
According to Variety, the Coen Bros aren't aiming for a traditional remake -- they want to return to the original Charles Portis novel, and make a more faithful adaptation. Their version will be told from Mattie's point of view, as the original novel is, and keep Cogburn as a side player. The Coens will undoubtedly amp up the Biblical tone and include the darker elements ... like what really happens to her after the snakebite.
Click to expand...

In any event, I have always loved westerns and will definitely see this new version when it comes out.

-KeithP
 
Turin39789 said:
wow, never imagined a JW movie would be remade, have others been?
Click to expand...
Not even Stagecoach was safe from the gratuitous remake; there was actually a version (1986) with Kris Kristofferson, Willie Nelson, Johnny Cash and Waylon Jennings. Avoid it like the Plague.
The 1966 Alex Cord/Bing Crosby/Ann Margaret/Van Heflin version is not much better.
 
CallMeJoe said:
Not even Stagecoach was safe from the gratuitous remake; there was actually a version (1986) with Kris Kristofferson, Willie Nelson, Johnny Cash and Waylon Jennings. Avoid it like the Plague.
The 1966 Alex Cord/Bing Crosby/Ann Margaret/Van Heflin version is not much better.
Click to expand...

Oh, FFS. 🙁

I love Stagecoach. wish I never knew this. ...it kinda sounds like the Kristofferson, Nelson, Cash, and Jennings version is good for a few laughs, though? I mean, they probably concocted the idea while co-habiting at Betty Ford, and I imagine most of them falling off the wagon during primary production.
 
zinfamous said:
Oh, FFS. 🙁
I love Stagecoach. wish I never knew this. ...it kinda sounds like the Kristofferson, Nelson, Cash, and Jennings version is good for a few laughs, though? I mean, they probably concocted the idea while co-habiting at Betty Ford, and I imagine most of them falling off the wagon during primary production.
Click to expand...
They turned the doctor into Doc Holliday, played by Willie Nelson...
 
they should start retiring movies or at least characters, like they do with jersey numbers in sports ... never to be used again. once john wayne has played a role, no one is capable of doing it better. same goes for charlton heston.
 
I fully expect John Wayne to come back from the dead, beat cancer, and proceed to start kicking ass and taking names.

john-wayne.jpg


God Bless America, and God Bless you John Wayne!
 
zinfamous said:
:hmm:
OK, now I want to see this! 😀
Click to expand...
My apologies in advance for your disappointment. It is a truly dreadful film; besides the questionable casting, IIRC, it was made-for-TV, with the concomitant artificial (and annoying) script breaks for advertisements.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top