They should have the death penalty for repeat child molesters

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
68
91
life in jail is:
1) more humane
2) cheaper
3) less contraversial

I would vote for life sentences for any valid reason. Death penalty's are jsut to stupid to waste time debating.
 

cirrhosis

Golden Member
Mar 29, 2005
1,337
1
0
I think they should have their entire genital area surgically removed, pour vinegar on the wound, sear it on the BBQ and have them go through a catheter for the rest of their life.
 

GoingUp

Lifer
Jul 31, 2002
16,720
1
71
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
life in jail is:
1) more humane
2) cheaper
3) less contraversial

I would vote for life sentences for any valid reason. Death penalty's are jsut to stupid to waste time debating.

Figures someone with Hillary 2008 in their sig would post such nonsense.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
life in jail is:
1) more humane
2) cheaper
3) less contraversial

I would vote for life sentences for any valid reason. Death penalty's are jsut to stupid to waste time debating.

Death Penalty is only more expensive because some states allow them to die of old age while on there. Hell, we could do it China style...bullet to the back of the head and then bill the family for the bullet.
 

venk

Banned
Dec 10, 2000
7,449
1
0
Intresting Quote:

In a separate case, Edilberto Datan, a 61-year-old San Diego man who has admitted to traveling to his native Philippines and having sex with eight underage boys, was sentenced Thursday to 17 years in federal prison and lifetime supervision.


Shouldn't he be tried by a Filipino court?
 

Raiden256

Platinum Member
Feb 11, 2001
2,144
0
0
They should have the death penalty for PEOPLE WHO POST IN THE WRONG FSCKING FORUM.


That is all.
 

notfred

Lifer
Feb 12, 2001
38,241
4
0
Schwartzmiller apparently did not register as a sex offender...

Why is this an option left up to the convict? Can't the state just put his name on a list when he's convicted?

Same thing goes for the selective service - why the hell do you have to sign up, can't they just put you on the list when you get a birth certificate?
 

newParadigm

Diamond Member
Jul 30, 2003
3,667
1
0
Originally posted by: Raiden256
They should have the death penalty for PEOPLE WHO POST IN THE WRONG FSCKING FORUM.


That is all.


Lol, this is more of a P&N issue.

~new
 

Zanix

Diamond Member
Feb 11, 2003
5,568
12
81
The death penalty should be the only sentance.

Molest some kideies? Death.
Stole a car? Death.
Cheated on your taxes? Death.
Caught speeding? Death.
Look funny? Death.
 

cirrhosis

Golden Member
Mar 29, 2005
1,337
1
0
Originally posted by: Zanix
The death penalty should be the only sentance.

Molest some kideies? Death.
Stole a car? Death.
Cheated on your taxes? Death.
Caught speeding? Death.
Look funny? Death.



Wouldn't that mean that everyone who posts on AT forums should be put to death? Minus the molesting part ofc.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: marvdmartian
My solution is to give them one of 2 choices:
1. get fixed......much like we do now to cats and dogs.....once they no longer feel the sexual urge, there's no reason (or sick-o joy) for them to continue molesting anyone, since their bodies no longer give their sick brains any feedback
2. frontal lobotomy......then hand 'em a broom, or a garbage bag, and get 'em working on cleaning up all the trash along the highways. Then at least they'll be a positive member of society. ;)

Castration or Lobotomization.......your choice.......we'll give you 5 minutes to think about it. :D

Castration is not an effective means for stemming child molestation. The behavior itself is habitual, and even elderly men who no longer have working penises molest children.

FWIW, I've prosecuted a number of child molesters, including one who got life in prison, and my take is this:

I am not generally in favor of the death penalty, but to the extent we have it, I think it's misapplied.

Murder actually has a relatively low rate of recidivism (usually when people commit murder, they are killing the lone person on earth they would ever kill), and although it's an awful crime, the murder victim's suffering ends when he or she dies.

Child molestation and rape, OTOH, have very high rates of recidivism (interestingly, and perhaps counter-intuitively, though familial child molestation has the lowest rate of recidivism in these kinds of cases, whereas men who rape adult strangers are the likeliest to re-offend).

These crimes create awful suffering in their victims that is lifelong, and the victims of child molestation are FAR more likely to suffer from severe depression and various other mental and emotional problems, up to and including split personality disorder. They are much likelier to become addicted to drugs and alcohol, and FAR likelier to commit crimes themselves as adults (particularly sexual offenses, but other crimes as well).

As such, it seems to me that if we are to have a death penalty at all, society would be better served executing rapists and child molesters than murderers (other than serial killers or other particularly aggravated murder cases involving torture or other especially heinous circumstances).
 

Zanix

Diamond Member
Feb 11, 2003
5,568
12
81
Originally posted by: cirrhosis
Originally posted by: Zanix
The death penalty should be the only sentance.

Molest some kideies? Death.
Stole a car? Death.
Cheated on your taxes? Death.
Caught speeding? Death.
Look funny? Death.



Wouldn't that mean that everyone who posts on AT forums should be put to death? Minus the molesting part ofc.

Death!!!
:|:|:|
 

2cpuminimum

Senior member
Jun 1, 2005
578
0
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: marvdmartian
My solution is to give them one of 2 choices:
1. get fixed......much like we do now to cats and dogs.....once they no longer feel the sexual urge, there's no reason (or sick-o joy) for them to continue molesting anyone, since their bodies no longer give their sick brains any feedback
2. frontal lobotomy......then hand 'em a broom, or a garbage bag, and get 'em working on cleaning up all the trash along the highways. Then at least they'll be a positive member of society. ;)

Castration or Lobotomization.......your choice.......we'll give you 5 minutes to think about it. :D

Castration is not an effective means for stemming child molestation. The behavior itself is habitual, and even elderly men who no longer have working penises molest children.

FWIW, I've prosecuted a number of child molesters, including one who got life in prison, and my take is this:

I am not generally in favor of the death penalty, but to the extent we have it, I think it's misapplied.

Murder actually has a relatively low rate of recidivism (usually when people commit murder, they are killing the lone person on earth they would ever kill), and although it's an awful crime, the murder victim's suffering ends when he or she dies.

Child molestation and rape, OTOH, have very high rates of recidivism (interestingly, and perhaps counter-intuitively, though familial child molestation has the lowest rate of recidivism in these kinds of cases, whereas men who rape adult strangers are the likeliest to re-offend).

These crimes create awful suffering in their victims that is lifelong, and the victims of child molestation are FAR more likely to suffer from severe depression and various other mental and emotional problems, up to and including split personality disorder. They are much likelier to become addicted to drugs and alcohol, and FAR likelier to commit crimes themselves as adults (particularly sexual offenses, but other crimes as well).

As such, it seems to me that if we are to have a death penalty at all, society would be better served executing rapists and child molesters than murderers (other than serial killers or other particularly aggravated murder cases involving torture or other especially heinous circumstances).

QFT :cookie:

Although I still think that castration and 30years imprisonment should be the standard mandatory penalty for a first offense of rape/molestation, and conviction of more than one count--->death. IMHO there should be a higher standard of evidence for the death penalty than for other penalties, like beyond a shadow of a doubt instead of just a reasonable one.
 

blakeatwork

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2001
4,113
1
81
probably already been said...

but it should be on the first conviction with DNA proof...

screw the defendant's rights... what about the kid that gets molested??