• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

the "whirring" noise when in reverse...?

I've always wondered what this is...
my best guess is the reverse gear never getting used and still having some texture on the teeth from milling.
 
Reverse gear is straight cut instead of helical cut.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manual_transmission

Reverse
The previous discussion normally applies only to the forward gears. The implementation of the reverse gear is usually different, implemented in the following way to reduce the cost of the transmission. Reverse is also a pair of gears: one gear on the countershaft and one on the output shaft. However, whereas all the forward gears are always meshed together, there is a gap between the reverse gears. Moreover, they are both attached to their shafts: neither one rotates freely about the shaft. What happens when reverse is selected is that a small gear, called an idler gear or reverse idler, is slid between them. The idler has teeth which mesh with both gears, and thus it couples these gears together and reverses the direction of rotation without changing the gear ratio.
In other words, when reverse gear is selected, it is in fact actual gear teeth that are being meshed, with no aid from a synchronization mechanism. For this reason, the output shaft must not be rotating when reverse is selected: the car must be stopped. In order that reverse can be selected without grinding even if the input shaft is spinning inertially, there may be a mechanism to stop the input shaft from spinning. The driver brings the vehicle to a stop, and selects reverse. As that selection is made, some mechanism in the transmission stops the input shaft. Both gears are stopped and the idler can be inserted between them. There is a clear description of such a mechanism in the Honda Civic 1996-1998 Service Manual, which refers to it as a "noise reduction system":
Whenever the clutch pedal is depressed to shift into reverse, the mainshaft continues to rotate because of its inertia. The resulting speed difference between mainshaft and reverse idler gear produces gear noise [grinding]. The reverse gear noise reduction system employs a cam plate which was added to the reverse shift holder. When shifting into reverse, the 5th/reverse shift piece, connected to the shift lever, rotates the cam plate. This causes the 5th synchro set to stop the rotating mainshaft.
—(13-4)
A reverse gear implemented this way makes a loud whining sound, which is not normally heard in the forward gears. The teeth on the forward gears of most consumer automobiles are helically cut. When helical gears rotate, there is constant contact between gears, which results in quiet operation. In spite of all forward gears being always meshed, they do not make a sound that can be easily heard above the engine noise. By contrast, most reverse gears are spur gears, meaning that they have straight teeth, in order to allow for the sliding engagement of the idler, which is difficult with helical gears. The teeth of spur gears clatter together when the gears spin, generating a characteristic whine.
It is clear that the spur gear design of reverse gear represents some compromises (less robust, unsynchronized engagement and loud noise) which are acceptable due to the relatively small amount of driving that takes place in reverse. The gearbox of the classic SAAB 900 is a notable example of a gearbox with a helical reverse gear engaged in the same unsynchronized manner as the spur gears described above. Its strange design allows reverse to share cogs with first gear, and is exceptionally quiet, but results in difficult engagement and unreliable operation. However, many modern transmissions now include a reverse gear synchronizer and helical gearing.
 
Last edited:
Here is what driving would be like if the forward gears were straight cut:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-k3YAjIQzI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmJH84FnQa8

Why did they do this? For race or high power applications, straight cut gears are stronger because the whole edge of the teeth contact. Teeth on helical gears have a sliding point contact, not unlike the blades of a pair of scissors, thus carry the same stress on a smaller section of the gear teeth which can chip or break more easily under heavy loads.
 
Last edited:
Here is what driving would be like if the forward gears were straight cut:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-k3YAjIQzI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmJH84FnQa8

Why did they do this? For race applications, straight cut gears are stronger because the whole edge of the teeth contact. Teeth on helical gears have a sliding point contact, not unlike the blades of a pair of scissors, thus carry the same stress on a smaller section of the gear teeth which can chip or break more easily under heavy loads.

oh my gosh link #2's whine would drive me crazy!
 
A disadvantage of helical gears is a resultant thrust along the axis of the gear, which needs to be accommodated by appropriate thrust bearings, and a greater degree of sliding friction between the meshing teeth, often addressed with additives in the lubricant.

From Wiki.
 
Hmm I'm seeing now that that straight cut gears being stronger isn't true? Learn something every day.

From my machine elements text book:

"The helical teeth operate more smoothly than equivalent spur gear [straight-cut] teeth, and stresses are lower. Therefore, a smaller helical gear can be designed for a give power-transmitting capacity as compared with spur gears. One disadvantage of helical gears is that an axial force, called a thrust force, is generated in addition to the driving force"

I would venture a guess that straight-cut gears are used to avoid the thrust and sliding issues associated with helical gears.
 
Very informative thread. That second video exdeath posted was excellent and I found myself laughing maniacally at the beginning, wondering how shrill it could get, perfect sound track for that skilled driving.
The only dogbox transmission I have ever rowed was on a huge box truck with airbrakes, and with the diesel it was no high-revving adrenaline pumping experience. It shifted well enough, though and the tire/wind noise easily drowned out the sound of the gearbox.
 
Ah, the memory of Ikarus buses from 1980 that had straight cut gear box. Nowadays, in my country, our buses MAZ use Mercedes, Renault, and Volvo engines and transmissions. Much quieter ride.
 
That's one of the many reasons we don't drive around in full on racing cars. They are uncomfortable, hot, noisy places to be. 99.9% of the population would never be able to deal with the amount of discomfort.


Ok, I'm about to commit a "the Garage" sin and reference Top Gear, but remember the one where James May decides to take a race car on one of their trips?
 
Back
Top