That's difficult to believe.Canadians probably know more about American politics then the average American.
Isn't it a little early to be this drunk?It has taken Decades in Canada to recognize the Senate as Bi-Partizan Vs the constituency of their Vote.
Perhaps the Senate has something say today without being belligerence from bribe.
After all the Senate did assassinate Ceaser.
Personally I'm disappointment in Cruz.
I suggest you re-read what you wrote and correct it into something more legibleIt has taken Decades in Canada to recognize the Senate as Bi-Partizan Vs the constituency of their Vote.
Perhaps the Senate has something say today without being belligerence from bribe.
After all the Senate did assassinate Ceaser.
Personally I'm disappointment in Cruz.
UglyCasanova - You so Justice and Politically STUPID - Suggest you read History.
Ugh the second in that story killed my stepdaughter's best friend. Fuck that pisses me off they did that.That's difficult to believe.
http://brianlilley.com/trudeaus-soft-on-crime-approach-is-on-full-display/
"
Two convicted killers are in the news for the special treatment, the soft on crime approach, of Justin Trudeau and his Liberals.
First Christopher Garnier, the man that killed police constable Catherine Campbell, and is now getting his PTSD treatment paid for by Veterans Affairs even though he is not a vet.
Trudeau and his cabinet claim to be outraged by the Garnier case but won’t revoke his treatment benefits. Actual vets are waiting while Garnier gets front of the line treatment.
In a statement the other day Veterans Affairs Minister Seamus O’Regan said this won’t happen going forward. Yet despite having the power to stop what is happening now, O’Regan said no.
Remember, vets are asking for more than we can give. That’s what Trudeau said last winter.
That statement, like this decision, is an insult to vets. It is also in keeping with Trudeau’s soft on crime outlook."
Isn't that a good thing? Or should the guy in charge just get to rubber stamp everything?Well apparently the Senate has the Power to Block or Appoint a Supreme Judge.
That's difficult to believe.
http://brianlilley.com/trudeaus-soft-on-crime-approach-is-on-full-display/
"
Two convicted killers are in the news for the special treatment, the soft on crime approach, of Justin Trudeau and his Liberals.
First Christopher Garnier, the man that killed police constable Catherine Campbell, and is now getting his PTSD treatment paid for by Veterans Affairs even though he is not a vet.
Trudeau and his cabinet claim to be outraged by the Garnier case but won’t revoke his treatment benefits. Actual vets are waiting while Garnier gets front of the line treatment.
In a statement the other day Veterans Affairs Minister Seamus O’Regan said this won’t happen going forward. Yet despite having the power to stop what is happening now, O’Regan said no.
Remember, vets are asking for more than we can give. That’s what Trudeau said last winter.
That statement, like this decision, is an insult to vets. It is also in keeping with Trudeau’s soft on crime outlook."
It's almost like you're proposing some harebrained scheme of checks and balances. It'll never fly.Isn't that a good thing? Or should the guy in charge just get to rubber stamp everything?
the Power of the future for the US over this Cavanaugh Vs Ford thing
FO, I'm not drunk. Canada was about to eliminate the Senate until it reformed back in the 90's for it to have a say.
Now your Senate is questioning it's very Basics.
Canada was never actually about to eliminate the Senate as it would require opening the constitution which just ain’t happening.