• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The US Senat Adjurnd over the Cavanaugh Case Vs Trudeau holding off NAFTA.

Canadians probably know more about American politics then the average American.
That's difficult to believe.
http://brianlilley.com/trudeaus-soft-on-crime-approach-is-on-full-display/

"
Two convicted killers are in the news for the special treatment, the soft on crime approach, of Justin Trudeau and his Liberals.

First Christopher Garnier, the man that killed police constable Catherine Campbell, and is now getting his PTSD treatment paid for by Veterans Affairs even though he is not a vet.

Trudeau and his cabinet claim to be outraged by the Garnier case but won’t revoke his treatment benefits. Actual vets are waiting while Garnier gets front of the line treatment.

In a statement the other day Veterans Affairs Minister Seamus O’Regan said this won’t happen going forward. Yet despite having the power to stop what is happening now, O’Regan said no.

Remember, vets are asking for more than we can give. That’s what Trudeau said last winter.

That statement, like this decision, is an insult to vets. It is also in keeping with Trudeau’s soft on crime outlook."
 
538.jpg


alrighty then
 
It has taken Decades in Canada to recognize the Senate as Bi-Partizan Vs the constituency of their Vote.

Perhaps the Senate has something say today without being belligerence from bribe.

After all the Senate did assassinate Ceaser.

Personally I'm disappointment in Cruz.

UglyCasanova - You so Justice and Politically STUPID - Suggest you read History.
 
Last edited:
FO, I'm not drunk. Canada was about to eliminate the Senate until it reformed back in the 90's for it to have a say.

Now your Senate is questioning it's very Basics.
 
It has taken Decades in Canada to recognize the Senate as Bi-Partizan Vs the constituency of their Vote.

Perhaps the Senate has something say today without being belligerence from bribe.

After all the Senate did assassinate Ceaser.

Personally I'm disappointment in Cruz.

UglyCasanova - You so Justice and Politically STUPID - Suggest you read History.
I suggest you re-read what you wrote and correct it into something more legible
 
So is this a Canda VS USA thing, our senate vs theirs? Appointed vs elected?

I will not argue that but to justify the Senate.
 
That's difficult to believe.
http://brianlilley.com/trudeaus-soft-on-crime-approach-is-on-full-display/

"
Two convicted killers are in the news for the special treatment, the soft on crime approach, of Justin Trudeau and his Liberals.

First Christopher Garnier, the man that killed police constable Catherine Campbell, and is now getting his PTSD treatment paid for by Veterans Affairs even though he is not a vet.

Trudeau and his cabinet claim to be outraged by the Garnier case but won’t revoke his treatment benefits. Actual vets are waiting while Garnier gets front of the line treatment.

In a statement the other day Veterans Affairs Minister Seamus O’Regan said this won’t happen going forward. Yet despite having the power to stop what is happening now, O’Regan said no.

Remember, vets are asking for more than we can give. That’s what Trudeau said last winter.

That statement, like this decision, is an insult to vets. It is also in keeping with Trudeau’s soft on crime outlook."
Ugh the second in that story killed my stepdaughter's best friend. Fuck that pisses me off they did that.
 
It really is cute when he pretends to understand what's happening up here.


That's difficult to believe.
http://brianlilley.com/trudeaus-soft-on-crime-approach-is-on-full-display/

"
Two convicted killers are in the news for the special treatment, the soft on crime approach, of Justin Trudeau and his Liberals.

First Christopher Garnier, the man that killed police constable Catherine Campbell, and is now getting his PTSD treatment paid for by Veterans Affairs even though he is not a vet.

Trudeau and his cabinet claim to be outraged by the Garnier case but won’t revoke his treatment benefits. Actual vets are waiting while Garnier gets front of the line treatment.

In a statement the other day Veterans Affairs Minister Seamus O’Regan said this won’t happen going forward. Yet despite having the power to stop what is happening now, O’Regan said no.

Remember, vets are asking for more than we can give. That’s what Trudeau said last winter.

That statement, like this decision, is an insult to vets. It is also in keeping with Trudeau’s soft on crime outlook."
 
Right Now your Senate holds the Power of the future for the US over this Cavanaugh Vs Ford thing.

Do I feel sorry for a rich teenager GOOF - I Don't !

Makes me wonder why Trump fired Commi.

Absolutely brilliant personal in your Senate.

In Democracy a Senate is a Political Play Ground - Where it Exist or Not is the Question as it's immune to Voters.
 
Last edited:
Always made me wonder why we need a Senate but in this case - Why NOT.


In which case a Commoner presents a case to question why a Court Justice should not be alleviated to Supreme Justice.

If the Senate has vitrification all the power to the System.

I'm just as stupefied as you are over this.

Spoiled Rich Kids, Hurt Feelings and Recourse aren't in my domain.

Now I'm one Scotch over and should have check my VPN Status ;o)
 
Last edited:
FO, I'm not drunk. Canada was about to eliminate the Senate until it reformed back in the 90's for it to have a say.

Now your Senate is questioning it's very Basics.

Canada was never actually about to eliminate the Senate as it would require opening the constitution which just ain’t happening.
 
Back
Top