The unspoken danger of the GOP self destruction is in giving single party power to the Democrats.

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,119
18,646
146
See South Africa and the ANC. Absolute power corrupts. No matter what side you're on politically, we need a multi-party system. Opposition is healthy.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
Tribalism and the extra representation given to rural areas is likely too strong for that to ever happen. Is is actually a bad thing though because it gives the GOP little reason to return to sanity. Despite the fact that their policies are overwhelmingly unpopular they are able to leverage these advantages to say, achieve unified control of government like right now.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,119
18,646
146
Tribalism and the extra representation given to rural areas is likely too strong for that to ever happen. Is is actually a bad thing though because it gives the GOP little reason to return to sanity. Despite the fact that their policies are overwhelmingly unpopular they are able to leverage these advantages to say, achieve unified control of government like right now.

Ya know, as I said in 2012, the religious right is the cancer the GOP must excise. I believe it is the root cause of all of this.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,337
32,882
136
LOL! The GOP controls the House, Senate, Presidency, and most state houses. IMHO, it is premature to worry about one party rule under any other party. The big boys who control the GOP wouldn't walk away in shame.

Maybe the OP was being ironic? :)
 

obidamnkenobi

Golden Member
Sep 16, 2010
1,407
423
136
Ya know, as I said in 2012, the religious right is the cancer the GOP must excise. I believe it is the root cause of all of this.

Perhaps some, but how much is the truly fundamentalist religious part of the GOP base these days? Trump, and the Tea party, won on right-wing identity politics; nationalism and fear of "the others" (immigrants, gays, minorities, china, elites, liberals etc). That strain of exclusionary "whos a real american" I believe is what fuels the worst parts of republicans these days. Same thing the tories struggle with in England. And it's on the rise elsewhere in Eurpoe too, with Macron being a welcome exception. This form of illiberal, selfish, nationalism must be marginalized for the developed world to have a functioning, effective and sane economic right/classically liberal voice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muse and Thebobo

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,255
136
Perhaps some, but how much is the truly fundamentalist religious part of the GOP base these days? Trump, and the Tea party, won on right-wing identity politics; nationalism and fear of "the others" (immigrants, gays, minorities, china, elites, liberals etc). That strain of exclusionary "whos a real american" I believe is what fuels the worst parts of republicans these days. Same thing the tories struggle with in England. And it's on the rise elsewhere in Eurpoe too, with Macron being a welcome exception. This form of illiberal, selfish, nationalism must be marginalized for the developed world to have a functioning, effective and sane economic right/classically liberal voice.
Every true fundamentalist I know it's die hard pro-trump and some of the most hateful people I know.
 

obidamnkenobi

Golden Member
Sep 16, 2010
1,407
423
136
Every true fundamentalist I know it's die hard pro-trump and some of the most hateful people I know.

Yes, definitely. But the hateful tribalism is the main problem, the fundies just happens to be in that group. It's the rest of the people there that drive the conservatives in a short-term, selfish direction.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
I think I mentioned this... :D

This feels like Monty Python "Come see the corruption inherent in the system". I think that system is approaching a point of non-viability. Not today of course but we're going to have to make a choice and pretend this is a republic which represents the interest of the people over the Senate and Caesar or take actions that bring those powers down and I don't mean picking from the same old same. Americans will likely continue to do the former.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
21,985
6,298
136
LOL! The GOP controls the House, Senate, Presidency, and most state houses. IMHO, it is premature to worry about one party rule under any other party. The big boys who control the GOP wouldn't walk away in shame.

Maybe the OP was being ironic? :)
You forgot the Supreme Court.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
I think I mentioned this... :D

This feels like Monty Python "Come see the corruption inherent in the system". I think that system is approaching a point of non-viability. Not today of course but we're going to have to make a choice and pretend this is a republic which represents the interest of the people over the Senate and Caesar or take actions that bring those powers down and I don't mean picking from the same old same. Americans will likely continue to do the former.

I do tend to agree with you that the system is approaching a breaking point. I would not be surprised if Trump leads to some sort of crisis in confidence in the system and soon. As I've said before it's pretty likely that Mueller will return a report that details significant criminal activity by the president and his associates. Either way that goes you have a crisis as if you remove Trump it's a deep state conspiracy and if you don't the rule of law no longer matters.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
21,985
6,298
136
See South Africa and the ANC. Absolute power corrupts. No matter what side you're on politically, we need a multi-party system. Opposition is healthy.
I'm a little curious as to what brought about this particular proclamation. Seems a bit premature.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,119
18,646
146
I'm a little curious as to what brought about this particular proclamation. Seems a bit premature.

Premature? Maybe. But it's been on my mind after my experience in a country with a one party system only a couple decades old and now witnessing the GOP hit critical batshit and guessing about the outcome of that.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,662
31,665
136
Early step get rid of gerrymandered districts so we can dilute the power of the crazies during primaries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ivwshane

Blackjack200

Lifer
May 28, 2007
15,995
1,688
126
Premature? Maybe. But it's been on my mind after my experience in a country with a one party system only a couple decades old and now witnessing the GOP hit critical batshit and guessing about the outcome of that.

One thing that might help is that the Democratic Party is such an astoundingly incompetent and ineffective organization. Losing a national election to Donald Trump is just the most visible example of how bad they are.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,119
18,646
146
One thing that might help is that the Democratic Party is such an astoundingly incompetent and ineffective organization. Losing a national election to Donald Trump is just the most visible example of how bad they are.

And yet, probably the best thing that ever could have happened for them.
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
And yet, probably the best thing that ever could have happened for them.

Dems seem to have a big flaw when they get into power. After a shitty Republican, they come in very popular and waste their time in power. After Bush you got Obama and then the Dems came in. They had everything and started to do some things with that power, and then got complacent. I remember seeing Nancy P. on the Daily Show and the disconnect was bad. Obama was fine, but, in Congress it was falling apart.

Dems have this bad habit of reacting to R's which ultimately means R's lead. For there to be balance we need to have both sides trying to push their ideas, and not one side pushing and the other side reacting.
 

Blackjack200

Lifer
May 28, 2007
15,995
1,688
126
And yet, probably the best thing that ever could have happened for them.

Short term, yes. The midterms will probably be a bloodbath, and there's a modest chance that Trump could be the first single term president since 1988.

But I saw this movie in 2008. The Democrats governed poorly, failed to ruthlessly implement the policies that a majority of Americans wanted, and ultimately had their shit handed to them.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,119
18,646
146
Short term, yes. The midterms will probably be a bloodbath, and there's a modest chance that Trump could be the first single term president since 1988.

But I saw this movie in 2008. The Democrats governed poorly, failed to ruthlessly implement the policies that a majority of Americans wanted, and ultimately had their shit handed to them.

Modest chance? Delusional. I think there's no chance and a high chance (90%+) he won't finish this term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Younigue

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,056
32,377
136
Dems seem to have a big flaw when they get into power. After a shitty Republican, they come in very popular and waste their time in power. After Bush you got Obama and then the Dems came in. They had everything and started to do some things with that power, and then got complacent. I remember seeing Nancy P. on the Daily Show and the disconnect was bad. Obama was fine, but, in Congress it was falling apart.

Dems have this bad habit of reacting to R's which ultimately means R's lead. For there to be balance we need to have both sides trying to push their ideas, and not one side pushing and the other side reacting.
They didn't get complacent. Americans immediately gave control of the House back to the GOP in 2010 and gave the GOP the ability to filibuster even before that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
They didn't get complacent. Americans immediately gave control of the House back to the GOP in 2010 and gave the GOP the ability to filibuster even before that.

Any why do you think they lost the power they took?
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,119
18,646
146
Any why do you think they lost the power they took?

Because they had the audacity to elect a black man to lead over white men.

That really is what it boils down to. There was no major scandal or failure in 2009 and 10. Just a ni... black guy in office commanding white men. And that led to the creation of a shit ton of batshit conspiracies and paranoia including Glenn Beck's whiteboard insanity tying Obama directly to satan himself.
 

Noah Abrams

Golden Member
Feb 15, 2018
1,041
109
76
I do tend to agree with you that the system is approaching a breaking point. I would not be surprised if Trump leads to some sort of crisis in confidence in the system and soon. As I've said before it's pretty likely that Mueller will return a report that details significant criminal activity by the president and his associates. Either way that goes you have a crisis as if you remove Trump it's a deep state conspiracy and if you don't the rule of law no longer matters.

Did anything happen to the "system" when Bill The Philanderer was almost removed from office? The "system" is a self perpetuating, utterly corrupt system. These "crisis" have almost nothing to do with the lives of average Americans. We are all political junkies and live in a bubble. In reality, what happens in politics has no effect on Americans. That ironically is a big reason why the vile creature got elected in the first place

"I would not be surprised if Trump leads to some sort of crisis in confidence in the system and soon"

If there was any confidence in the "system" left, he would not be in the WH in the first place.

In a way I agree with Haybusa when he said something along the lines that he wishes the vile one ends up just burning the whole damn system down. But like I said, the system is so much more powerful than that.
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,337
4,610
136
See South Africa and the ANC. Absolute power corrupts. No matter what side you're on politically, we need a multi-party system. Opposition is healthy.

This will not be the first time a major party has collapsed in the United States. The Republican's won't simply disappear, they will break up into several smaller parties, and then those parties will compete for a few cycles until one of them becomes the new default major party. In the mean time those smaller parties combined will win about the same number of seats as the Republicans did, and they will oppose the Democrats the same as the Republicans did. All that will happen is the Democrats will be able to get a small amount more accomplished than they would if the Republicans were still around because they will be better organized. Our electoral system fairly guarantees it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ivwshane

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
Did anything happen to the "system" when Bill The Philanderer was almost removed from office? The "system" is a self perpetuating, utterly corrupt system. These "crisis" have almost nothing to do with the lives of average Americans. We are all political junkies and live in a bubble.

Don't be ridiculous, the issues with Clinton and the issues with Trump are not only not in the same ballpark, they aren't even in the same state. These governance crises have a great deal to do with the lives of average Americans, it's just that people don't notice because it's long term and usually a second order effect.

In reality, what happens in politics has no effect on Americans. That ironically is a big reason why the vile creature got elected in the first place

That's unlikely. The better answer is racial anxiety.
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
Because they had the audacity to elect a black man to lead over white men.

That really is what it boils down to. There was no major scandal or failure in 2009 and 10. Just a ni... black guy in office commanding white men. And that led to the creation of a shit ton of batshit conspiracies and paranoia including Glenn Beck's whiteboard insanity tying Obama directly to satan himself.

So, the guy that won by a massive amount and was hugely popular was also not hugely popular and it caused a backlash? So, the trend that started before Obama is actually Obama's fault. Got it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ivwshane