The two faces of Rummy

[Zebo]

Link

 

[Fencer128]

Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Link

Now you know that people round here will discredit/dismiss your source in about 3s flat! 😉

Cheers,

Andy

 

[UltraQuiet]

Rummy's an asshole. There's maybe six people in the Pentagon that like him, the rest wouldn't piss in his ass if his guts were on fire.

As to the article is it common for the BoD to know of every business deal that a company makes? I don't think it is.

 

[Zebo]

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Rummy's an asshole. There's maybe six people in the Pentagon that like him, the rest wouldn't piss in his ass if his guts were on fire.

As to the article is it common for the BoD to know of every business deal that a company makes? I don't think it is.

LOL UQ

Well he did lobby the clinton administration and congress for the deal so in this case yes I think so.

 

[UltraQuiet]

Originally posted by: Carbonyl

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Rummy's an asshole. There's maybe six people in the Pentagon that like him, the rest wouldn't piss in his ass if his guts were on fire.

As to the article is it common for the BoD to know of every business deal that a company makes? I don't think it is.

LOL UQ

Well he did lobby the clinton administration and congress for the deal so in this case yes I think so.

I didn't see the part where it says he lobbied the admin. I think it is also clear he didn't do anything illegal. Trust me when I tell you that I am the last guy to defend Rummy but I don't see the big deal. In one capacity he was acting as a member of a for profit corp. and in another capacity he was acting as a member of our goverment. I would expect his actions to be different.

 

[Alistar7]

"The Clinton package sought to defuse tensions on the Ko rean peninsula by offering supplies of oil and new light water nuclear reactors in return for access by inspectors to Pyongyang's atomic facilities and a dismantling of its heavy water reactors which produce weapons grade plutonium. Light water reactors are known as "proliferation-resistant" but, in the words of one expert, they are not "proliferation-proof".

The type of reactors involved in the ABB deal produce plutonium which needs refining before it can be weaponised."

 

[Zebo]

The article says

One unnamed ABB board director told Fortune magazine that Mr Rumsfeld was involved in lobbying his hawkish friends on behalf of ABB.

I donno, it just reaks when you consider

not that Mr Rumsfeld supported the Clinton-inspired diplomacy and the ABB deal but that he did not "speak up against it". "One could draw the conclusion that economic and personal interests took precedent over non-proliferation," said Steve LaMontagne, an analyst with the Centre for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation in Washington.

 

[Alistar7]

And yes Fencer the Guardian's editorial slant is well known....

 

[Fencer128]

Originally posted by: Alistar7
And yes Fencer the Guardian's editorial slant is well known....

I think you're being generous calling it a "slant"! It's slightly more than that IMHO. Mind you - that's not to say they never have a point - you just have to read it carefully to make sure the facts bare it out.

Cheers,

Andy