Originally posted by: Syringer
Leno is better at doing the Tonight Show, Conan is better at doing the Conan O'Brien show. Leno's monologue and humor is slightly more sophisticated while Conan has animals that poop on others..I'm not too sure how that'll translate over.
It's like trying to make a relationship out of the crazy party girl--it's just asking for trouble.
You pretty much nailed it, everyone should stick where they're at. Actually I'm starting to lose interest in Conan- keeps wasting too much time on the show (like Letterman), like when he makes some goofy face while moving in an odd manner towards the camera. Does it every monologue, takes up time, never ever funny. Not sure if he always wasted time (hadn't much watched the show for the last 3-5 years), but he does it all the time nowadays.
The interviews I hardly ever watch, I hate celebrity bullshit (BTW, Larry King show 90% of the time = light night talk shows w/o the humor ).
Long as I'm here, I'd like to state that I prefer watching the first half hour of Leno to watching Steven Colbert. The Report ain't bad, but he was so much better when doing the field interviews for the Daily Show- made a complete ass out of both himself and the interviewee in a hilarious way, now he is too one sided. John Oliver is the new Steven Colbert (or should I say old)