Originally posted by: datalink7
I could go on and on, but in short summery:
A multitude of bad guys killed or arrested = winning
Peace accord between embattled communities = winning
Infrastructure buildup = winning
Ability for locals to actually recieve health care = winning
At least in my mind.
In case you hadn't noticed, we're not having a pissing contest.Originally posted by: Lemon law
I think in any pissing contest between TastesLikeChicken and datalink7, I will side with datalink7. He is the guy in the trenches that sees first hand the human equation. This is a war of emotions and not facts, and emotions are just as valid of facts.
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: datalink7
I could go on and on, but in short summery:
A multitude of bad guys killed or arrested = winning
Peace accord between embattled communities = winning
Infrastructure buildup = winning
Ability for locals to actually recieve health care = winning
At least in my mind.
No one is disputing your effort and bravery. At $12 billion a month we can stop a bunch of bad guys in the US, build up our own crumbling infrastruture and provide health care for millions of Americans.
This is not a nation-building exercise. It's past time to declare victory and redeploy.
Fixed.Originally posted by: chucky2
So the next time we invade another country/local tribe/whatever and force them to put their resources/security/well being/people on the line to help our financial and strategic interests
The lesson learned here isn't that we need to stay in Iraq. It's that we need to stop getting involved in stupid conflicts.And then they say, Like when you abandoned the South Vietnamese? Like when you abandoned the Afghani's? Like when you abandoned the Iraqi's?
You can fortify the oil fields as much as you want; it'll all get taken down with one explosive charge placed at any point on the thousands of miles of pipeline.Originally posted by: Nebor
Seems that it's time to abandon the major population centers, fortify the oil fields and other valuable resources, and let them go at one another.
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: GrGr
Can you define "winning" pls?
Certainly.
-snip-
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Fixed.Originally posted by: chucky2
So the next time we invade another country/local tribe/whatever and force them to put their resources/security/well being/people on the line to help our financial and strategic interests
The lesson learned here isn't that we need to stay in Iraq. It's that we need to stop getting involved in stupid conflicts.And then they say, Like when you abandoned the South Vietnamese? Like when you abandoned the Afghani's? Like when you abandoned the Iraqi's?
Originally posted by: jpeyton
You can fortify the oil fields as much as you want; it'll all get taken down with one explosive charge placed at any point on the thousands of miles of pipeline.Originally posted by: Nebor
Seems that it's time to abandon the major population centers, fortify the oil fields and other valuable resources, and let them go at one another.
Originally posted by: datalink7
I could go on and on, but in short summery:
A multitude of bad guys killed or arrested = winning
Peace accord between embattled communities = winning
Infrastructure buildup = winning
Ability for locals to actually recieve health care = winning
At least in my mind.
:laugh:Originally posted by: Nebor
Patrol it, physically and electronically. If we can secure our borders, we can secure an oil pipeline.
Originally posted by: jpeyton
:laugh:Originally posted by: Nebor
Patrol it, physically and electronically. If we can secure our borders, we can secure an oil pipeline.
So what you're saying is we'll never secure the oil pipelines in our lifetime?
Originally posted by: jpeyton
:laugh:Originally posted by: Nebor
Patrol it, physically and electronically. If we can secure our borders, we can secure an oil pipeline.
So what you're saying is we'll never secure the oil pipelines in our lifetime?
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: jpeyton
:laugh:Originally posted by: Nebor
Patrol it, physically and electronically. If we can secure our borders, we can secure an oil pipeline.
So what you're saying is we'll never secure the oil pipelines in our lifetime?
Well, hopefully in that time we'll find an alternative source that makes securing oil a non-issue...
Originally posted by: Lemon law
As jpeyton points out---So what you're saying is we'll never secure the oil pipelines in our lifetime?
Not when you are talking about the inept leadership of GWB&co? Those dumb MF's could not secure a wall mart parking lot. They are totally incapable of understanding people.
And think that because they can get away with fooling the American people, that is enough.
Thank God for people like datalink7 and his command. At least they have a clue that its all about the Iraqi people. Who is more irrational, GWB&co. or the Iraqi thugs he has empowered? No matter what the answer is, the Iraqi people lose, we lose, and what do we expect? Tell it to the Iraqi people, we had to kill you to save you so we can steal your oil.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: jpeyton
:laugh:Originally posted by: Nebor
Patrol it, physically and electronically. If we can secure our borders, we can secure an oil pipeline.
So what you're saying is we'll never secure the oil pipelines in our lifetime?
Well, hopefully in that time we'll find an alternative source that makes securing oil a non-issue...
I see where you're going, and I like it: Burning Mexicans for fuel.
Originally posted by: Lemon law
As jpeyton points out---So what you're saying is we'll never secure the oil pipelines in our lifetime?
Not when you are talking about the inept leadership of GWB&co? Those dumb MF's could not secure a wall mart parking lot. They are totally incapable of understanding people.
And think that because they can get away with fooling the American people, that is enough.
Thank God for people like datalink7 and his command. At least they have a clue that its all about the Iraqi people. Who is more irrational, GWB&co. or the Iraqi thugs he has empowered? No matter what the answer is, the Iraqi people lose, we lose, and what do we expect? Tell it to the Iraqi people, we had to kill you to save you so we can steal your oil.
Now that Sadr has called off his cease-fire, well see who was wrong in here and who wasn't. Though I suspect that if it doesn't go Sadr's way a few in here will argue that "Technically, Sadr didn't call off the cease-fire."Originally posted by: Stoneburner
This was unexpected? Only ProfJohn was dumb enough to believe otherwise.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Now that Sadr has called off his cease-fire, well see who was wrong in here and who wasn't. Though I suspect that if it doesn't go Sadr's way a few in here will argue that "Technically, Sadr didn't call off the cease-fire."Originally posted by: Stoneburner
This was unexpected? Only ProfJohn was dumb enough to believe otherwise.
We'll see what happens though. imo, Sadr doesn't have nearly the cache in Iraq that some in here allot him.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Now that Sadr has called off his cease-fire, well see who was wrong in here and who wasn't. Though I suspect that if it doesn't go Sadr's way a few in here will argue that "Technically, Sadr didn't call off the cease-fire."Originally posted by: Stoneburner
This was unexpected? Only ProfJohn was dumb enough to believe otherwise.
We'll see what happens though. imo, Sadr doesn't have nearly the cache in Iraq that some in here allot him.