The stupidest environmentalist complaint ever

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Story link


September 17, 2002


IT'S NOT JUST DENNIS KUCINICH who's into space kookery. Check out this item from Democrats.Com on the private TransOrbital moon mission (no permalinks, you'll have to scroll):

Like all the other international laws, Bush is now ignoring those pertaining to space. As America is distracted by 9/11 remembrances and warnings of new threats, His Heinous has turned the moon over to a private, for-profit corporation called TransOrbital that has a far-reaching, frigthening agenda for the corporate domination of space. All TransOrbital had to do was promise not to contaminate and pollute the moon - yeah, right. That's what the oil companies say about ANWR. There was no Congressional vote - not even any consultation. Bush simply acted as if the moon were his to give away. The TransOrbital venture could be disastrous for the globe - no scientist today could predict yet how adding mass to the moon via human infrastructure or removing mass, via mining, will impact the delicate gravitational interplay between Earth and its only satellite. The moon belongs to all the people of the Earth - not to George. W. Bush or his friends at TransOrbital.

(Emphasis added). Actually, pretty much any scientist could tell you that nothing TransOrbital does could make the slightest difference in the "gravitational interplay" between the Earth and its "only satellite." (Er, only satellite except for this one, and this one).

The Moon's mass is .07 x 1024 kg. The Earth is approximately 81 times more massive. By contrast, TransOrbital is talking about payloads in the hundreds (102) of kilograms at most. Can these people do math? Do they have any idea what they're talking about?

Why am I wasting my time asking such obvious questions?

Democrats.Com is a parody site, right? Well, yes, whether intentionally or not.



 

MrBond

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2000
9,911
0
76
If you ask me, the corporate domination of space is a GOOD thing. It's not like they're going to section off part of space and not let NASA go there. NASA doesn't have the money to fund trips to the moon, which could possibly be beneficial to research by developing low gravity labs.

This is AMERICA, we are supposed to be rewarded for discoveries and innovation, be it with money or recognition.
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
My guess is that the moon (and all other planets and moons in our solar system) are pretty much up for grabs to anyone that can get there and set up a permanent settlement. The idea that they are "owned by the people of the world" is about as meaningful as "your check is in the mail".
 

snooker

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2001
2,366
0
76
Originally posted by: Linflas
My guess is that the moon (and all other planets and moons in our solar system) are pretty much up for grabs to anyone that can get there and set up a permanent settlement. The idea that they are "owned by the people of the world" is about as meaningful as "your check is in the mail".


My thoughts exactly.

If I could get to mars, it would be mine!!!! :)
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,408
19,795
146
Read my sig.

These people don't care about any environment. They are anti-capitalist, and will oppose free trade, no matter where it happens.