The south has earned a stigma. Most infamous for a century of enduring racism following its defeat in the civil war, that's not the only reason.
A certain brand of fundamentalism and ignorance, extensive poverty, the home of the 'redneck' culture, being the bane of the democrats before becoming the home to much of the right-wing culture in the republican party (the party used to be largely centered in the urban northeast) all contribute.
These are stereotypes and generalizations, of course, with many exceptions; you will find very few southerners today, for example, who express explicit racist views. The south has all kinds of good qualities in places and its own unique culture in a positve sense as well. It has some liberals, some high tech, and so on, too. But the stigma persists, however much the south is catered to as the swing vote in national elections.
The following story, IMO, is a exemplary anecdote about why. Yes, the guy was removed from office, when he refused to back down - but are there any other regions in the US he ever could have obtained such high office, have kept his position with all his problems if he'd compromised a little, and have a large ongoing following now? It's an outrage that he could hold the office he did.
Link to the story that triggered this thread
The best the south could say to the criticsm seemed to be Lynyrd Skynyrd's meaningless retort to Neil Young that 'A souther man don't need him around anyhow'.
And then went on to say that Watergate didn't bother them.
Yay for the south, in those aspects. Comments such as in another thread tonight that the South should not have any representation in the federal government are incorrect, in my view (and I assume facetious), but understandable given the disasters they've given the country. It seems we're unable to elect a democratic president who is not from the south since 1960. That's a lot of good candidates who are unelectable.
A certain brand of fundamentalism and ignorance, extensive poverty, the home of the 'redneck' culture, being the bane of the democrats before becoming the home to much of the right-wing culture in the republican party (the party used to be largely centered in the urban northeast) all contribute.
These are stereotypes and generalizations, of course, with many exceptions; you will find very few southerners today, for example, who express explicit racist views. The south has all kinds of good qualities in places and its own unique culture in a positve sense as well. It has some liberals, some high tech, and so on, too. But the stigma persists, however much the south is catered to as the swing vote in national elections.
The following story, IMO, is a exemplary anecdote about why. Yes, the guy was removed from office, when he refused to back down - but are there any other regions in the US he ever could have obtained such high office, have kept his position with all his problems if he'd compromised a little, and have a large ongoing following now? It's an outrage that he could hold the office he did.
Link to the story that triggered this thread
The best the south could say to the criticsm seemed to be Lynyrd Skynyrd's meaningless retort to Neil Young that 'A souther man don't need him around anyhow'.
And then went on to say that Watergate didn't bother them.
Yay for the south, in those aspects. Comments such as in another thread tonight that the South should not have any representation in the federal government are incorrect, in my view (and I assume facetious), but understandable given the disasters they've given the country. It seems we're unable to elect a democratic president who is not from the south since 1960. That's a lot of good candidates who are unelectable.
