• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Smoking Gun: Michael Jackson sexual abuse allegations "unfounded", according to internal LAPD memo.

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
TSG: Police, child welfare probers concluded sex abuse charges "unfounded"

DECEMBER 9--A confidential investigation by Los Angeles police and child welfare officials concluded earlier this year that allegations Michael Jackson sexually abused a cancer-stricken boy were "unfounded," according to an internal government memo obtained by The Smoking Gun.

The probe's findings were based, in large part, on interviews with the alleged victim, his two siblings, and the boy's mother. According to the memo, when the child was questioned in February by a social worker assigned to the Sensitive Case Unit of L.A.'s Department of Children & Family Services (DCFS), he "denied any form of sexual abuse" by Jackson and said that he never "slept in the same bed as the entertainer." While not specifically named in the DCFS memo, the 45-year-old Jackson is referred to repeatedly as "the entertainer."

The memo notes that the boy, now 14, and his 12-year-old brother--who also denied sexual abuse--expressed "a fondness for the entertainer and stated they enjoyed visiting his home, where they would often ride in the park, play video games, and watch movies." The pair's sister, now 17, told a social worker that she accompanied the boys on "sleepovers at the entertainers home," but had "never seen anything sexually inappropriate between her brothers and the entertainer."

--

This is starting to sound more and more like the mother has dollar signs flashing before her eyes and doesn't mind throwing her kids into the midst of some very ugly rumours to get at them. WTG Mom.
 
Originally posted by: yllus
TSG: Police, child welfare probers concluded sex abuse charges "unfounded"

DECEMBER 9--A confidential investigation by Los Angeles police and child welfare officials concluded earlier this year that allegations Michael Jackson sexually abused a cancer-stricken boy were "unfounded," according to an internal government memo obtained by The Smoking Gun.

The probe's findings were based, in large part, on interviews with the alleged victim, his two siblings, and the boy's mother. According to the memo, when the child was questioned in February by a social worker assigned to the Sensitive Case Unit of L.A.'s Department of Children & Family Services (DCFS), he "denied any form of sexual abuse" by Jackson and said that he never "slept in the same bed as the entertainer." While not specifically named in the DCFS memo, the 45-year-old Jackson is referred to repeatedly as "the entertainer."

The memo notes that the boy, now 14, and his 12-year-old brother--who also denied sexual abuse--expressed "a fondness for the entertainer and stated they enjoyed visiting his home, where they would often ride in the park, play video games, and watch movies." The pair's sister, now 17, told a social worker that she accompanied the boys on "sleepovers at the entertainers home," but had "never seen anything sexually inappropriate between her brothers and the entertainer."

--

This is starting to sound more and more like the mother has dollar signs flashing before her eyes and doesn't mind throwing her kids into the midst of some very ugly rumours to get at them. WTG Mom.

That's kind of what I always believed. Only thing was that one document that I read on smokinggun where the kid went into details on what happend. That was just plain sick.
 
Originally posted by: yllus
TSG: Police, child welfare probers concluded sex abuse charges "unfounded"

DECEMBER 9--A confidential investigation by Los Angeles police and child welfare officials concluded earlier this year that allegations Michael Jackson sexually abused a cancer-stricken boy were "unfounded," according to an internal government memo obtained by The Smoking Gun.

The probe's findings were based, in large part, on interviews with the alleged victim, his two siblings, and the boy's mother. According to the memo, when the child was questioned in February by a social worker assigned to the Sensitive Case Unit of L.A.'s Department of Children & Family Services (DCFS), he "denied any form of sexual abuse" by Jackson and said that he never "slept in the same bed as the entertainer." While not specifically named in the DCFS memo, the 45-year-old Jackson is referred to repeatedly as "the entertainer."

The memo notes that the boy, now 14, and his 12-year-old brother--who also denied sexual abuse--expressed "a fondness for the entertainer and stated they enjoyed visiting his home, where they would often ride in the park, play video games, and watch movies." The pair's sister, now 17, told a social worker that she accompanied the boys on "sleepovers at the entertainers home," but had "never seen anything sexually inappropriate between her brothers and the entertainer."

--

This is starting to sound more and more like the mother has dollar signs flashing before her eyes and doesn't mind throwing her kids into the midst of some very ugly rumours to get at them. WTG Mom.

I thought they agreed to not sue him in civil court
 
Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
Are we talking about the current kid who accused him?
I'm a little confused on this point too. I believe so.

That would make this memo related to the first time the kid was interviewed by the state to inquire into any wrongdoing on MJ's part. Later on, the kid was apparently interviewed a second time and the story completely changed.
 
Originally posted by: rbloedow
Ahhh, the details are out. Jacko is a wacko, but he doesn't molest children.

I would agree. The kids mom figured he would probably pay to make it go away with out the need of a civil suit.
 
I was watching Celebrity Justice or Entertainment Tonight (one of those) and they were talking about how the mother of the allegedly victim was trying to get money out of the documentary that was made about MJ last year because her son was in the documentary. SO..... Didnt they let it slip by letting ppl know who the "victim" is? They even showed a clip of it again with his face fuzzed out.
 
I thought in the previous allegations the alleged victim was able to accurately describe MJ's genitals in detail?

I want MJ to be innocent but come on, he's a 45 year old man who thinks sleeping in bed with kids is ok!
 
Originally posted by: dabuddha
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: TommyVercetti Are we talking about the current kid who accused him?
dude ijust saw ur "g/f" how does it feel to date one of india's top actress 😀
I wouldn't say top actress. I kinda find her annoying. Now Rani Mukherjee... mmmm before anyone demands pics

no way, rani mukherjee is a good actor but shez just FUGLY
 
Back
Top