The search for Osama may be down to a 100sq mile area

[EagleKeeper]

Originally posted by: glugglug

Originally posted by: Genx87
That doesnt make him fake does it? I am asking a question, is OBL real or fake? I could have sworn the video I saw of him was real. But maybe it was just the work of some talented video editors?

The actor in the OBL videos is real. However, Al Quaeda is a ficticious organization dreamt up by the GOP in order to have a common enemy to rally support against.

Hopefully, the second sentence is pure sarcasm.

 

[BoomerD]

100 square miles? How big IS the Crawford ranch anyway?

 

[dmcowen674]

Originally posted by: Pens1566
Only as stupid as someone that starts a thread questioning the timing/motivations of the breaking of the foley story, and then thinks its ok for the same sources to conveniently break an Osama story 6 days before the election.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: Pens1566
Only as stupid as someone that starts a thread questioning the timing/motivations of the breaking of the foley story, and then thinks its ok for the same sources to conveniently break an Osama story 6 days before the election.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

umm, PJ never questioned the reporter's (source's) timing. He questioned the intentional withholding of the damaging emails by the private blogger for 4 months. Do you guys ever pay attention to those details, or do you think your LOLing and soundbites are enough to make others miss those same details?

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Originally posted by: Pens1566
Only as stupid as someone that starts a thread questioning the timing/motivations of the breaking of the foley story, and then thinks its ok for the same sources to conveniently break an Osama story 6 days before the election.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

umm, PJ never questioned the reporter's (source's) timing. He questioned the intentional withholding of the damaging emails by the private blogger for 4 months. Do you guys ever pay attention to those details, or do you think your LOLing and soundbites are enough to make others miss those same details?

Gee, I guess that blogger should have waited to "spring" the story just a little bit longer then, to get the maximum effect .

Do you really expect intelligent people to believe that they just realized they have OBL pinned to to a 100 square mile area?

LOL, they knew right where those dreaded WMD's were too, right!!

 

[umbrella39]

Originally posted by: Pens1566
Only as stupid as someone that starts a thread questioning the timing/motivations of the breaking of the foley story, and then thinks its ok for the same sources to conveniently break an Osama story 6 days before the election.

/thread and hopefully this posters privs to post here. Almost 2000 posts in 3 months and not one has been worthy of reading. GTFO.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: umbrella39

Originally posted by: Pens1566
Only as stupid as someone that starts a thread questioning the timing/motivations of the breaking of the foley story, and then thinks its ok for the same sources to conveniently break an Osama story 6 days before the election.

/thread and hopefully this posters privs to post here. Almost 2000 posts in 3 months and not one has been worthy of reading. GTFO.

why? because he disagrees with you? you want him banned because you do not agree with his opinions?

so much for liberal open-mindedness...

 

[Harvey]

I think we should send an entire batallion of neocon chickenhawk armchair wannabe warriors to search for OBL. They should be able to cover 100 sq. mi. in no time. We should give special preference for the mission to all those in the administration and Congress.

I'm sure they'd do a heckuva job.

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: umbrella39

Originally posted by: Pens1566
Only as stupid as someone that starts a thread questioning the timing/motivations of the breaking of the foley story, and then thinks its ok for the same sources to conveniently break an Osama story 6 days before the election.

/thread and hopefully this posters privs to post here. Almost 2000 posts in 3 months and not one has been worthy of reading. GTFO.

why? because he disagrees with you? you want him banned because you do not agree with his opinions?

so much for liberal open-mindedness...

So if I tear up junk mail or block spam then I forfeit my status as a liberal? PJ's selling and no one is buying, at least not many. I too think he would be happier someplace else.

 

[umbrella39]

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: umbrella39

Originally posted by: Pens1566
Only as stupid as someone that starts a thread questioning the timing/motivations of the breaking of the foley story, and then thinks its ok for the same sources to conveniently break an Osama story 6 days before the election.

/thread and hopefully this posters privs to post here. Almost 2000 posts in 3 months and not one has been worthy of reading. GTFO.

why? because he disagrees with you? you want him banned because you do not agree with his opinions?

so much for liberal open-mindedness...

Who the hell said liberals are open-minded? I guess that means you think that repugs are close-minded. For the most part, I will agree with you on that point.