• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Rolling Stones are horrible

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: hdeck
beatles suck. stones suck. they were popular because they were the first.

What an absolutely ignorant statement.

First or not, both bands were well above average musicians. And as much as I love The Beatles, The Stones are the better band when talking music technicality.

The guitar pieces being played by Richards on Exile On Main Street was truly revolutionary, and has directly influenced rock styling more than any other style throughout time.

Just because you think they 'suck' doesn't make it so.
 
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Originally posted by: Son of a N00b
Originally posted by: PaulNEPats
I've been listening to some of their stuff and it's terrible. Why do these guys attract so many fans?

go die


painfully



in a fire


and then drown



lol but seriously I love their stuff even though they were before my time, same with the beatles and spirngsteen, joel etc


painted black
start me up
sympathy for the devil
angie
satisfaction

I mean come on...

"the beatles" SUCK. They know 3 chords and repeat it. They suck. They are no talents. if you like them, you might as well like the backstreet boys.

PERIOD
WTF? they don't play 3 chords over and over. you're an idiot.
 
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Originally posted by: Son of a N00b
Originally posted by: PaulNEPats
I've been listening to some of their stuff and it's terrible. Why do these guys attract so many fans?

go die


painfully



in a fire


and then drown



lol but seriously I love their stuff even though they were before my time, same with the beatles and spirngsteen, joel etc


painted black
start me up
sympathy for the devil
angie
satisfaction

I mean come on...

"the beatles" SUCK. They know 3 chords and repeat it. They suck. They are no talents. if you like them, you might as well like the backstreet boys.

PERIOD

Good one, seriously...excellent sarcasm.
 
More clueless wonders who appreciate nothing about the legacy of music. Apparently, the detractors are the here and now kinds of peeps, who have no appreciation of history.
I think one of the great missions of the Stones, and a worthy goal, at this point, is to be the oldest of the old school bands. Rock on dudes. Jagger is my dad's age, and I'm not that young. 😉

If you don't like em, don't go to their concerts, but I'm betting they will continue to sell lots of tickets for years to come.
 
Let it Bleed, Sticky Fingers, and Exile on Main Street are all incredible albums all the way through. The rest of their albums are inconsistent, but having three incredible albums is an accomplishment many bands can't even dream to aspire to achieve.
 
Originally posted by: hdeck
beatles suck. stones suck. they were popular because they were the first.
Wow clueless kids who now are tit fed Monkey music by the Record Industry don't like the Stones..go figure.



 
Back
Top