The right to self defense in poltical debate

[Pulsar]

I will say this once more, then I'm done with this insanity.

The WTC7 building fell as one would expect. Once structural integrity fails, you're done and it WILL basically fall at the speed of free-fall.

Here is the North tower collapse. Amazingly, only the top 20-30 floors collapses - yet the momentum and weight of the top portion of the building wipes out the bottom hundreds of floors as it falls. Structural integrity is gone, and down it goes. At the same speed that WTC7 went (put them side by side in the videos if you doubt it.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCSXco-bPNo

Likewise for the south tower, here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBOd1XB943o

There are literally hundreds of valid engineering analysis about the events that shoot kylewhatever's 'argument' all to hell:

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journa.../Eagar/eagar-0112.html
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

Actual formulas:
http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm

Independent university class research by students:
http://www.civil.northwestern....nt/PDFs/Papers/405.pdf

Video proof of NO freefall:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=335_1193103122

Have fun in your insane little world kylewhatever.

 

[Red Irish]

Originally posted by: DivideBYZero

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: kylebisme

Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
One last time
...

Repeating your same arguments over and over again while ignoring my previous responses to them isn't going to further discussion this time any more than it did all the times you did this before. I could respond to the bulk of your post simply by quoting myself, but figure I've already wasted enough time with you in doing that.

Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
I am not going to do research on the issue and I do not think that other moderators are going to spend their time on researching.

What we will do is evaluate the information provided and make a decision.

I gather you lack the interest and/or ability to comprehend my position, and hence are simply waiting for someone to make an argument which you feel supports your belief that I am mistaken. Hence the reason you chalanged me by quoting an argument which I had already addressed in my OP. What I am at a loss to explain is how you are oblivious to the absurdity of your conduct here.

The facts speak for themselves...
I am not talking about your supposed "facts" which have been refuted over and over on your thread.
Then your apparent rebuttal of other peoples facts is laughable at best.
Especially when you question there understanding of what was said or the best you can do is say well my understanding of what was said is....
Then your holding stedfast to the video which show none of the things you claim it shows...lol

His post wasn't directed at you.

1) No trolling, flaming or personally attacking members. Deftly attacking ideas and backing up arguments with facts is acceptable and encouraged. Attacking other members personally and purposefully causing trouble with no motive other than to upset the crowd is not allowed.

They work in tandem, maybe they live together.