- Nov 5, 2010
- 938
- 0
- 0
I know the Dems failed to include this into the health care law, but one thing makes no sense. Obama said something like, you would not lose your doctor with the public option. How can that possibly be true? Say I'm a small business owner who provides health care benefits to my employees. Then the public option is introduced, and as a smart business man, I cut my employee's health care benefits, since they can just use the public option instead. Those people would have different coverage, and therefore would have a different doctor. The government wouldn't directly assign you a new doctor, but that would be the indirect effect of the policy. How can Dems possibly refute this?