The plane takes off, 0.999... = 1, but what about...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SilthDraeth

Platinum Member
Oct 28, 2003
2,635
0
71
Say you have x = .9999999999999999....
multiply both sides by 10, and subtract the original from it.

10x = 9.99999999999999999...
-x = 0.99999999999999999...
9x = 9
x=1

Lets try this again. But lets just use 5 (9s)
x = .99999... (multiply both sides by 10)
10x= 9.9999... (correct so far) 9.9999/10=x (x=.99999)
Then you say subtract the original from it.
(10x)-x does equal 9x This is where your logic becomes flawed.
(10x=9.9999) - (x=.99999)= 8.99991 which doesn't equal 9
9x= (9)x(.99999)= 8.99991

But X does not in fact equal 1. 9/8.99991 x actually equals .99999
 

JohnCU

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
16,528
4
0
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: JohnCU
If you have 2 liquids (you don't know what they are), 1 mL of each and you add them together, can you be 100% sure that the resulting solution is 2 mL?


No.

Mix ethanol and water. You won't have 2 ml. Water and ethanol are miscable, and the alcohol absorbs water.

:thumbsup:
 

msparish

Senior member
Aug 27, 2003
655
0
0
Originally posted by: SilthDraeth
Say you have x = .9999999999999999....
multiply both sides by 10, and subtract the original from it.

10x = 9.99999999999999999...
-x = 0.99999999999999999...
9x = 9
x=1

Lets try this again. But lets just use 5 (9s)
x = .99999... (multiply both sides by 10)
10x= 9.9999... (correct so far) 9.9999/10=x (x=.99999)
Then you say subtract the original from it.
(10x)-x does equal 9x This is where your logic becomes flawed.
(10x=9.9999) - (x=.99999)= 8.99991 which doesn't equal 9
9x= (9)x(.99999)= 8.99991

But X does not in fact equal 1. 9/8.99991 x actually equals .99999

You have a misunderstanding of the concept of infinity.
 

GasX

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
29,033
6
81
if the two liquids are bleach and ammonia the resulting mixture is about 0 mL
 
Dec 10, 2005
29,570
15,110
136
Originally posted by: msparish
Originally posted by: SilthDraeth
Say you have x = .9999999999999999....
multiply both sides by 10, and subtract the original from it.

10x = 9.99999999999999999...
-x = 0.99999999999999999...
9x = 9
x=1

Lets try this again. But lets just use 5 (9s)
x = .99999... (multiply both sides by 10)
10x= 9.9999... (correct so far) 9.9999/10=x (x=.99999)
Then you say subtract the original from it.
(10x)-x does equal 9x This is where your logic becomes flawed.
(10x=9.9999) - (x=.99999)= 8.99991 which doesn't equal 9
9x= (9)x(.99999)= 8.99991

But X does not in fact equal 1. 9/8.99991 x actually equals .99999

You have a misunderstanding of the concept of infinity.

Infinite levels of infinity.... That is the correct way of doing it. It's how you turn repeating decimals into fraction.
 
Dec 10, 2005
29,570
15,110
136
Originally posted by: Mwilding
if the two liquids are bleach and ammonia the resulting mixture is about 0 mL

He said later in the thread that they don't react. The example given later was Ethanol and Water. They are miscible, so the final volume is less than 2mL.
 

cyclohexane

Platinum Member
Feb 12, 2005
2,837
19
81
no, mixing sulfuric acid and water will result in so much heat release that you'll lose a lot of volume.
 

BrownTown

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
5,314
1
0
.99999 DOES EQUAL 1 (this is not up for debate, if you don't understand why this is true thats your own fault, but this is a fact in mathematics)

Mixing ethanol and water results in a considerbly smaller volume since they hydrogen bond tightly and become more dense, there are hundreds of other examples, but ethanol + water is most famous.

Whats this plane taking off thing, never heard that b4?
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Originally posted by: BrownTown
.99999 DOES EQUAL 1 (this is not up for debate, if you don't understand why this is true thats your own fault, but this is a fact in mathematics)

Mixing ethanol and water results in a considerbly smaller volume since they hydrogen bond tightly and become more dense, there are hundreds of other examples, but ethanol + water is most famous.

Whats this plane taking off thing, never heard that b4?

You've got a plane on a conveyor belt. When the plane moves forwards, the conveyor matches its speed in reverse. Can the plane take off?

The debate mostly centers on the definition of "matching the plane's speed in reverse."

There is a way to stop the plane from taking off if we use ideal physics (ie everything is indestructible) and a certain reading of the control system, but in all other cases the plane takes off.
 

Syringer

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
19,333
3
71
Originally posted by: BrownTown
.99999 DOES EQUAL 1 (this is not up for debate, if you don't understand why this is true thats your own fault, but this is a fact in mathematics)

No it doesn't ;)

Mixing ethanol and water results in a considerbly smaller volume since they hydrogen bond tightly and become more dense, there are hundreds of other examples, but ethanol + water is most famous.

Whats this plane taking off thing, never heard that b4?

If a plane is on a conveyor belt, will it take off?
 

Rayden

Senior member
Jun 25, 2001
790
2
0
Water and alcohol mixed together will take up less space than the two seperate.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Ummm, I'm going to have to disagree with the "mass is conserved" people as well. If a chemical reaction takes place, mass is lost to energy.
 

everman

Lifer
Nov 5, 2002
11,288
1
0
It depends on if there's a chemical reaction, also if the plane takes off and whether or not .999 = 5.
 

BrownTown

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
5,314
1
0
DrPizza, attempting to point out the fact that mass is lost in a chemical reaction is really pushing it. For all practical purposes mass is considered to be conserved. I guarentee you if I took a chemical engineering class and said i couldn't solve a problem using conservation of mass becasue the chemical reaction would lose mass the professor would fail me. (and probably call me an idiot too)
 

SilthDraeth

Platinum Member
Oct 28, 2003
2,635
0
71
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: BrownTown
.99999 DOES EQUAL 1 (this is not up for debate, if you don't understand why this is true thats your own fault, but this is a fact in mathematics)

Mixing ethanol and water results in a considerbly smaller volume since they hydrogen bond tightly and become more dense, there are hundreds of other examples, but ethanol + water is most famous.

Whats this plane taking off thing, never heard that b4?

You've got a plane on a conveyor belt. When the plane moves forwards, the conveyor matches its speed in reverse. Can the plane take off?

The debate mostly centers on the definition of "matching the plane's speed in reverse."

There is a way to stop the plane from taking off if we use ideal physics (ie everything is indestructible) and a certain reading of the control system, but in all other cases the plane takes off.

About to go read the link. But is the plan actually "moving forward", or staying in place.

Not that it matters.

Editing again. Of course my initial question was dumb, until I thought about it. :)
 

BrownTown

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
5,314
1
0
The plane is moving forward becasue the motion of the wheels and the forward motion are not related assuming that the parts are well oiled and such. In reality there would be a little additional drag due to the spinning wheels, but it would be neglidgible unless the conveyor belt was going reallf really fast.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Originally posted by: BrownTown
DrPizza, attempting to point out the fact that mass is lost in a chemical reaction is really pushing it. For all practical purposes mass is considered to be conserved. I guarentee you if I took a chemical engineering class and said i couldn't solve a problem using conservation of mass becasue the chemical reaction would lose mass the professor would fail me. (and probably call me an idiot too)

Is mass conserved in a chemical reaction? No. Is the loss in mass negligible? Yes. The answer to the second question does not change the answer to the first question.
 

BigPoppa

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,930
0
0
Easy to baby step someone through this, mix a cup of water and a cup of sugar. Wow its not 2 cups of volume? Proceed to liquids.

Ponder: Can gases be "miscible" in each other or does it not work at that point? Trying to baby step my way through that one, liquid + gas, but not giving me the visual I want. Haven't ever covered like that in any of my chem courses.