• Guest, The rules for the P & N subforum have been updated to prohibit "ad hominem" or personal attacks against other posters. See the full details in the post "Politics and News Rules & Guidelines."

Discussion The Patient Gamer: The Witcher 2 - Assassin of Kings - A Flawed Gem

GodisanAtheist

Platinum Member
Nov 16, 2006
2,324
700
136
I recently completed a playthrough of The Witcher 2: Assassin of Kings. Having heard such great things about the Witcher 3, and having played and completed the Witcher 1 with some enjoyment, I decided to give the maligned 2nd game in the series another shot. This was probably my 3rd or 4th start on the game, with me abandoning my prior runs primarily due to difficult gameplay that I didn't really understand. This time I made sure to use an Xbox One controller and keep some game guides handy in the event that I needed them. I'm glad I did.

The TL:DR here is this - If you've been looking for a "Bioware-esq" RPG with branching dialogue, choice and consequence, that cinematic experience with fully voiced characters and lines, and plenty of "we'll bang", then the Witcher 2 is exactly what you're looking for. Its on sale on Steam at the minute for a couple bucks and is really never too expensive anywhere, so buy it.

The game centers around Geralt of Rivia, a legendary Witcher (a modified human made to hunt monsters) in a pseudo medieval world that is rife with Game of Thrones style political machinations between numerous factions (The Nilfgard Empire, Temerians, Redanians, Kedwenians, Adernians, rebellions, dragons, elfs, dwarves, humans, sorceresses, and on and on and on). Geralt, using a well worn fantasy/rpg trope, is suffering from amnesia and looking to find clues to his past life, but given the ending events of the prior game has found himself in the service of a king.

The game definitely does not hand-hold on the story telling elements much, perhaps in a ploy to get the player in the same "amnesiac" shoes as Geralt, and I sometimes found it difficult to follow who or what the characters were talking about. The game really embraces the concept of "this character knows you, and clearly has a history with you, but you know nothing about them". Nevertheless, I felt compelled to keep playing as the plot of the game unfolded, as the intrigue from the GoT style politics as well as Geralt's past were cleverly interwoven to keep the lead firmly in hand pulling you forward. My only critique here is while the prologue and the first two acts are packed with things to do, the game does definitely run out of steam and really narrows the scope for the third act. I didn't really mind however, as by that point I was ready for the game to wrap up and reveal its secrets.

The game also has some entertaining villains, the best kind that possess some elements of nobility and logical goals that just happen to be in the way of what you're trying to accomplish, never devolving into "I'm the bad guy because every game needs a bad guy" and always feeding the core plot.

The plot also branches significantly after the first act, where you're forced to choose between two sides of the same conflict. My understanding is you still visit the same places, but get a different set of quests, dialogue, and options to continue the story.

As mentioned earlier, the gameplay had always been my biggest hang-up with the game. This run however, it finally clicked: don't try to play this game like Devil May Cry or another hack and slash, you'll get absolutely thrashed early on. It takes a much more deliberative approach to combat (although it remains third person and real time) involving a attack/block/parry/position mechanic. Dodge and roll like crazy, hit and run, and make clever use of your signs (magical abilities), and get behind the enemy to backstab to turn the tide of battle. Having tried to use the KB+M in prior runs, I found using a controller really suited this game well and felt much more natural to use.

Unlike many of the game's ilk, the potion system is also a bit unique. With regard to potions, you need to consume them prior to entering a fight (potions can have you deal additional damage, or increase you health regen, or even have you see in the dark) and which only have a limited duration (usualy 5-10 minutes). This can be a bit frustrating if you're just strolling around and suddenly get jumped by a horde of monsters. All the same, i actually kind of enjoyed the minute or two of prepwork involved in getting together a mix of potions to consume prior to descending into some horrible place where there be monsters.

In a somewhat frustrating nod to the RPG elements of the game, some very useful game mechanics are hidden behind the leveling/skill system. You cannot use throwing knives until you unlock the skill. You cannot parry attacks until you unlock the skill. Eneregy recharges almost pointlessly slow until you get some skill upgrades. Enemies backstabbing you will eat through your health in one or two hits until you get some skill upgrades. You cannot attack groups of enemies at once until... well you get it. After you've acquired these skills, and gotten some better gear, the game substantially eases up in difficulty and plays more like the hack n' slash you expected than something like Dark Souls.

Technically speaking, the game is an absolute gem. This is basically DX9 taken as far as it could reasonably be expected to go. The game is beautiful, full stop. The art direction is gorgeous. The environments, the characters, everything is richly detailed and an joy to drink in with the senses. The music, sound design, and voice acting are all generally top notch. The game was well ahead of its time, and easily stands the test of time in a way many games do not.

Occasionally, the environments did become a bit confusing to navigate. The gameworld is deceptively small, and to make the game look larger the devs clearly implemented some tricks to make sure that your view distance is always fairly limited (but they were smart enough to do it in a natural way). I also always felt that the game had us linger a bit too long in each of the environments given their relatively modest size, but never for too long. At the end of each chapter, I was always ready to move on with the scenery but was never completely burnt out on it thanks to the art direction and clever level design.

Performance on modern systems is great. Played between my laptop (Mobile i7 processor and mobile GTX 1050; 1080p/60hz) and my desktop (signature rig; 1440p/144hz). Laptop handled high settings fine with some minor slowdowns, while my desktop was able to crank up to Ultra no problems, buttery smooth. I did encounter some crash to desktop issues on my desktop rig in during some very specific segments of the game (very end of the first chapter and very end of the second chapter) where there were substantially more characters/action on the screen.

So to reitterate: If you like the Witcher Universe, if you've been looking for another "cinematic RPG" in the vein of Bioware's Mass Effect in a fantasy setting, if you just want a good game to play and you don't have a bunch of money in your pocket, The Witcher 2 is right here, waiting to be played. By all accounts it has been overshadowed by the mountains of praise the third installment of the game has received, but it is a great pseudo open world game in its own right with a tight story, entertaining characters, and gorgeous graphics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Artorias

ondma

Golden Member
Mar 18, 2018
1,468
406
106
I thought it was good, not great. Definitely worth a playthrough.
I played through it once, but have no desire to replay it.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
102,022
16,262
136
It also took me 2 playthroughs....possibly like OP, it was the Kayren fight where they gameplay just suddenly hits a wall that you aren't expecting up to that point. ...plus, the seemingly random (yes, it was in the prologue, and made me mad enough then, but...) button timing stuff that just soured me out.

But then I came back to it many years later, some time ahead of Witcher 3 (because that was looking to be more my style, and I wanted to really understand some things....even though I also never finished W1, despite nearly 40 hours maybe...just got bogged down and exhausted by item management stuff), and really did love this one after I just made myself be more patient with that map and work into that fight, and just finish it. It ..kinda opened up more, and as gorgeous and good as this game is, I never liked the "RPG on rails" mechanic. It never really worked for me and is something that I can't forget. I don't play call of duty/most FPS games because of this crap, and I didn't expect it there, but that's what it is. ....and it's kind of why the game manages to be stunning to this day. You've got set environments that you will never have to worry about performance wise, so you can really spend resources on the pretty. It's a decision, and I'm fine with that.

It also got bogged down with what I call "fantasy political bollocks." I snoozed through all the empire and faction stuff and bored me to know end. I legitimately hated all the Radovid and whoseitswhatits and whatever (mainly because the names in the Witcher stuff just sound purposefully stupid, I guess?)....but then I got way more into all that with Witcher 3. I don't know why that had more of an impact with me, and that it made me wonder if I took a shit on that Witcher 2 a bit too prematurely. I think it's the writing and art design and casting, really, in Witcher 3 that brought me into all of that more. especially the Bloody Baron storyline early on. ....that's the sort of moment where a game just becomes way more than just a game. It does achieve something beyond that, and so then, I think, I should explore Witcher 2 again...but hell, I've got 200+ games in my queue that I've never played, so yeah. No.
 

GodisanAtheist

Platinum Member
Nov 16, 2006
2,324
700
136
For me it really wasn't the kyran fight, which I actually passed in one shot... It was all of floatsam leading up to it.

You just start out the game so weak that combat outside the floatsam walls with the endlessly spawning enemies and cheap hits became overly frustrating.

As soon as I realized that just running past enemies until you actually need to do a monster quest was a viable strategy did the game really open up to the superb quests that tie the whole game together.

I'll freely admit that while a good amount of the fantasy politics bollocks required a Google search to fully understand, I appreciated that all of it was relatively logical and never devolved into "Trek Talk" for the sake of sounding complicated (all the players had logical roles to play, the northern Kings were playing the small game while the empire was playing the big one).
 

GodisanAtheist

Platinum Member
Nov 16, 2006
2,324
700
136
Replaying Witcher 1 with mods...better story lime IMO than TW2
- Although it's been years, I remember the plot of 1 being much simpler but more straight forward.

2 has a pretty good story, but there is too much crammed into "too short" a game so there are some major plot points and story elements that suddenly appear in the last part of the third act.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY