The one thing guys have to know about girls

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

crystal

Platinum Member
Nov 5, 1999
2,424
0
76
Originally posted by: Pabster
brtspears2 wrote:

"Funny, I just had an arguement with the lady. She insists a cup of rice is the same as eating a cup of sugar... I gave up so I could go back to counter-strike."

And she's absolutely correct. Rice = simple carbohydrates = sugar. To the body, they are one in the same.

Yeah, but 1 cup of rice is not equal to 1 cup of carbohydrates != 1 cup of sugar.

 

BD231

Lifer
Feb 26, 2001
10,568
138
106
Originally posted by: Omegachi
Originally posted by: brtspears2
Funny, I just had an arguement with the lady. She insists a cup of rice is the same as eating a cup of sugar... I gave up so I could go back to counter-strike.

wtf? Yea, she is wrong on that one. I am on your side.

Actually she?s right, rice has no nutritional value to it whatsoever (vitamins, minerals ect.). All it is made of is carbohydrate, which your body turns directly into sugar. It is no different than popcorn or any type of processed bread. Its those types of foods that make a lot of this countries people so overweight. It's also why more and more people are getting diabetes and having blood sugar regulation problems.
 

Peetoeng

Golden Member
Dec 21, 2000
1,866
0
0
Originally posted by: bdog231


Actually she?s right, rice has no nutritional value to it whatsoever (vitamins, minerals ect.). All it is made of is carbohydrate, which your body turns directly into sugar.

Whatsoever? Whoa, check your facts again. Since when carbohydrates is not nutrition? And rice has some vitamin B. Try not to eat carb at all for a week, let's see how your minerals and vitamins diet works out.

 

RU482

Lifer
Apr 9, 2000
12,689
3
81
I've got one that, when we fight, calls me immature and then stops off to our room and slams the door...EVERY FRIGGEN TIME

we don't fight very often, though
 

BD231

Lifer
Feb 26, 2001
10,568
138
106
Originally posted by: Peetoeng
Originally posted by: bdog231


Actually she?s right, rice has no nutritional value to it whatsoever (vitamins, minerals ect.). All it is made of is carbohydrate, which your body turns directly into sugar.

Whatsoever? Whoa, check your facts again. Since when carbohydrates is not nutrition? And rice has some vitamin B. Try not to eat carb at all for a week, let's see how your minerals and vitamins diet works out.

I would argue with you but since you probably have no clue what your talking about I'm going to refrain from laying it ALL out for you. In short, any moron knows you need carbs, I mean considering all foods, besides meat and most if not all types of cheeze, contain them
rolleye.gif
. Rice has a high glucose level, all high glucose foods are fairly poor to horrible means of nutrition when compared to low glucose foods. So please, do away with the cynical attitude.
 

SludgeFactory

Platinum Member
Sep 14, 2001
2,969
2
81
Besides being a starch instead of a simple sugar, rice has some protein, some fiber, some vitamins, some minerals. Sugar has none of that. Saying that rice is the equivalent of table sugar is ludicrous.

 

BD231

Lifer
Feb 26, 2001
10,568
138
106
Originally posted by: SludgeFactory
Besides being a starch instead of a simple sugar, rice has some protein, some fiber, some vitamins, some minerals. Sugar has none of that. Saying that rice is the equivalent of table sugar is ludicrous.

Ask and dietitian and he'll tell you its damn close buddy, sure its better than sugar, but just about anything is better than sugar when it somes to your health. You can research it for yourself though, there are plenty of resources on the web that will explain the simple logic behind that statement.
 

SludgeFactory

Platinum Member
Sep 14, 2001
2,969
2
81
Originally posted by: bdog231
Ask and dietitian and he'll tell you its damn close buddy, sure its better than sugar, but just about anything is better than sugar when it somes to your health. You can research it for yourself though, there are plenty of resources on the web that will explain the simple logic behind that statement.
Your original statement was

Actually she?s right, rice has no nutritional value to it whatsoever (vitamins, minerals ect.).
which is wrong.

Its those types of foods that make a lot of this countries people so overweight. It's also why more and more people are getting diabetes and having blood sugar regulation problems.
Yeah, those Asian countries with rice as a staple of their diet sure have a big problem with obesity and diabetes too.
rolleye.gif


You came in and made it sound like rice is worthless as a food, which is patently untrue. You know how to read a GI table, good for you. I don't give a sh!t about that, because when I eat rice it's combined with a protein source, and other carbs and fat.






 

Bobomatic

Senior member
Dec 31, 2001
514
0
0
Right now I find myself wondering how much a pound if sugar and rice is compared to each other, and how I can alter my rice vs. sugar intake.;)
 

Dragnov

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2001
6,878
0
0
You came in and made it sound like rice is worthless as a food, which is patently untrue. You know how to read a GI table, good for you. I don't give a sh!t about that, because when I eat rice it's combined with a protein source, and other carbs and fat.

Yeah thats what I was thinking. Rice making people fat and overweight?! =P America is fat because of high meat intake. Rice ain't all that bad... it's not liek Asians are dying at a young age or anything. In fact, essentially EVERYTHING is bad for you if you take it out of moderation...

 

timmyG

Senior member
Oct 12, 2000
536
0
0
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
It is a mistake to expect women to behave like men.

good advice

and i dont think eating a cup of rice would have as many calories as a cup of pure sugar but then again im no dietician. besides wtf likes eating pure sugar

 

BD231

Lifer
Feb 26, 2001
10,568
138
106
Ok SludgeFactory, I'm glad to know you try and balance your meals. Unfortunately we are talking about 'a cup of rice to a cup of sugar', not "a well balanced meal to a cup of sugar", let me know when you pick up on that. The 'cup of rice to a cup of sugar' statement is wrong in the measurement sense I admit, but in terms of effect it?s right on track. When you eat rice (ALONE), all your blood cells get is sugar, the effect takes a bit longer because rice is a complex carbohydrate, pure sugar is obviously already broken down. Anybody can counteract the rise of insulin when sugar is sent to the blood stream if they include other sources of protein, we do it every day, but since we are not talking about that it doesn?t matter.

Eating rice has the same systemic cellular effect as sugar dose and that?s what I was trying to get across, and when rice is cooked it looses almost all its nutritional value(vitamins,ect., DUH not carbs that?s what its composed of).


and i dont think eating a cup of rice would have as many calories as a cup of pure sugar but then again im no dietician. besides wtf likes eating pure sugar

Rice has the highest water content of any grain when cooked. If you were to extract every ounce of water from the rice, then granulate it, I'd imagine you can in effect get the same caloric intake ounce for ounce as you do with sugar. Nuts and Grains are natures 'weight gain powder'.