the new Pan-American Union - POLL added

morkinva

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 1999
3,656
0
71
related CFR document



Merger with Mexico

Posted: July 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45352
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

One of the most frequently asked questions I hear is this: Why does the federal government refuse to accept its responsibility to enforce immigration laws and border security?

Now the answer is becoming clear.

And it's not pretty.

The shadow government ? the elitists ? do indeed have a plan. And it is a plan that does not include any vestige of U.S. sovereignty or constitutional government. It is a plan for merger ? a European Union-style government for North America and eventually the rest of the Americas and the world.

It's all spelled out in the latest reports by the Council on Foreign Relations. There's a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

Though there has been no national debate on merger with the corruption and socialism of our neighbors to the north and south, there is a roadmap. And unless the American people rise up in righteous indignation against this plan, the roadmap to merger will become the inevitable, guiding force in setting U.S. policy.

In many ways, it already has.

The goal of this merger couldn't be clearer ? "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital and people flow freely."

The CFR's strategy calls specifically for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people." It calls for laying "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." It calls for us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations." It calls for us to "harmonize entry screening."

More open? How could it be any more open? How could the flow of people be any freer? Criminals, terrorists, drug dealers and other undesirables cross into the U.S. on a daily basis ? unchecked, unmolested, unscreened. How could we have any less enforcement?

Well, imagine Mexico as the 51st state. That's a picture of what the CFR has in mind with regard to the flow of human traffic back and forth between the two countries.

By the way, even though you didn't hear any national debate about this plan, your president has already committed you, your children and your grandchildren to this policy, according to the CFR.

In "Building a North American Community," the shadow government's 59-page manifesto for merger, we are informed President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal March 23 when they met in Texas.

You might remember that little get-together. It was there that Bush characterized the the Minuteman organization of heroic citizen border monitors as "vigilantes."

Last month, a follow-up meeting was held in Canada, suggesting this plan be put on the fast track. The U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, explained at that time that "we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders."

Silly me. I thought the objective of Homeland Security was to protect the American people from terrorist attacks! But the real goal is making it easier for Mexicans and Canadians and anyone else using those territories to enter our country undetected and unmolested.

The CFR plan also calls for massive redistribution of wealth ? more of your hard-earned money flowing to Mexico and Canada to make this panacea possible. It also calls for the implementation of "the Social Security Totalization Agreement" so that illegal aliens will be certain to bankrupt the system Bush claims to be trying to save.

It is a stunning betrayal of the will of the American people, the Constitution of the United States, the Declaration of Independence and all of our notions of limited government, self-government, freedom, sovereignty, the rule of law and justice.

I don't know how else to say it: It is an open conspiracy to commit treason.

It's time to fight the War of Independence all over again.


__________________________________________________________

and again, it's not a left-right thing. The CFR has many democrats on their member list
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
From the document itself:

THE COUNCIL TAKES NO INSTITUTIONAL POSITION ON POLICY ISSUES
AND HAS NO AFFILIATION WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. ALL STATEMENTS
OF FACT AND EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION CONTAINED IN ITS PUBLICATIONS
ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR OR AUTHORS.
 

StormRider

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2000
8,324
2
0
And then the American Union would merge with the EU. And then later other countries join in and we would be one big happy united world.
 

tw1164

Diamond Member
Dec 8, 1999
3,995
0
76
Originally posted by: StormRider
And then we would explore space and create colonies under this new "Federation".

Can I start wearing my funny colored jumpsuit now, or do I have to wait?
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: StormRider
And then we would explore space and create colonies under this new "Federation".

And then we would do the Dance of Joy and proclaim Balki as our God.
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Umm... It's an opinion piece written by an organization that has no affilliation with any government. It carries about as much weight as Cato, Heritage, People for the American Way, MoveOn.org... I'm not getting too excited about it one way or the other.

Edit: And I don't look good in jumpsuits. Can we have a golf shirt/shorts kind of uni?
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
I really dont think we should absorb Canada(too liberal :D) or mexico(too corrupt). however I dont have major problems with more countries adopting the dollar...
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
I refuse to take seriously anything said by someone who references the "shadow government". Anyone with even the most remote exposure to the federal government would see they have enough trouble running an actual government, much less a secret shadow one. The rest of the article is conspiracy theory BS without a shred of evidence to back up any of the claims.

As a side note, from a security perspective (keeping terrorists, etc, out of the US), the author couldn't be more wrong. Our issue right now is that it is impossible to secure all that land border between the US and Mexico or Canada. "Concerned citizens" aside, it's just too much space that's too easy to cross. Coupled with the more lax security coming into Mexico and Canada from anywhere, and you have a much easier way to get into the country. Certainly securing the other entry points is no easy task, but it's much easier than huge borders. So if we eliminated border checks with Canada and Mexico totally, but worked with them to beef up their sea and airport security (an eaiser task), we would end up with a more secure situation overall. The only way to enter North America by land would be Mexico's southern border, a much easier border to secure.