Originally posted by: ja1484
Originally posted by: everydae
Originally posted by: ja1484
Originally posted by: everydae
Selling much better than some cars ATers praise about (ie. Genesis), I believe.
Price difference much?
And of course they're selling well. They're hideous and tacky as hell.
Well, I should have said "compare to what ATers say."

Anyway, design is always subjective. Let's not be a moron who judge the car by its look.
Uh, how is that moronic? Aesthetics play a huge part in the purchasing decision. Last time I was shopping for a vehicle there were certain models I crossed off the list immediately just because of how they looked. Anyone who says they don't take looks into account when buying a vehicle is lying. Plain and simple.
Beyond that, my point was that suburban Americans will buy anything as long as it's ugly enough. Subtlety and elegance have been lost on 20 and 30somethings in this country for a while now.
What I am saying is that it's YOUR view and sure, YOU can judge the car by its view for YOUR OWN purchase. But why come to this public forum, telling how it looks bad to YOUR eyes and saying "it's ugly, it's stupid, it's designed by retard, blah blah blah"? That sounds moronic enough to me.
Let me repeat myself again. Design is subjective matter. Even if it looks ugly to your eyes, it doesn't mean it's ugly to everyone. Ugly is subjective.
Audi's interior is ugly (For that matter, all the European cars are). Prior to Bangle, BMW's design was outdated, and I thank to Bangle pushing BMW's design more trend leader. Those are my view, but I don't come here and say that because that's my SUBJECTIVE view. Duh.