LOL, no, the government was neutral and the people were with the North.
There was an upper class movement that did support the South to begin with but that support quickly ended when they realized that the South would never support them back.
well, you've missed the thrust of my earlier point. It was not meant to deflect and perhaps if you read the entire post, you'll realize I was far more critical of the US and nearly all developed countries in their never-ending outsourcing of uncomfortable labor issues to this day. Who cares what "the people" thought? You argued that
Britain supported this or that policy, but look: history is generally quite grey and textbooks can only get you so far (I dare say that a textbook is one of the worst sources for accurate information--primary sources and journals are far more nuanced and thorough. Textbooks often eschew important context to favor general ideas).
All I was saying was that I have often found it interesting that the non-Americans habitually thumb their noses at the US because they "banished" slavery decades and centuries before the US...though the actual reality is that they simply outsourced slavery to the colonies and later the US, wholly dependent and unashamedly supportive (the government--again, it matters not what "the people" thought--you might as well stop blaming the US for the same past evils if you actually care that much more about what "the people" thought) of the institution to provide the world's dry goods and grains--which, again, isn't entirely different than
what we are currently doing with outsourcing our long-banned labor practices to 3rd world work camps to manufacture our cheap and stylish Banana Republic Dungarees.