• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The Movie Memento

BeeVo

Golden Member
I just watched this movie for the second time and it is really bugging me the more I think about it.

POSSIBLE SPOILERS IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE MOVIE:

Just a few questions:
1. Is he Sammy Jenkins?
2. Is John Gammell just using him the whole time?
3. Anyone else notice at the very end when he is imagining his wife laying across his chest it says on his left peck "I've Done It" when in the rest of the movie it doesn't show it tattooed on him?

Also I want to hear your take on the whole movie.
 
yes
yes
yes. color scenes were played "backwards" while black and white scenes were in chronological order
 

Is who Sammy Jenkins?



Is John Gammell using him?...Why do you ask?



"I've Done It" tattoo: Thanks, I'll have to check that out.
 
Originally posted by: BentValve
Is who Sammy Jenkins?



Is John Gammell using him?...Why do you ask?



"I've Done It" tattoo: Thanks, I'll have to check that out.

i think he's asking because memento is a mindfvck and a half the first time through 🙂
 
i saw this movie one and a half times....the half because they kept fvcking replaying what i just watched

and it pissed me off, it was interesting, but pissed me off so much that i didnt really enjoy it
 
Originally posted by: xSauronx
i saw this movie one and a half times....the half because they kept fvcking replaying what i just watched

and it pissed me off, it was interesting, but pissed me off so much that i didnt really enjoy it

Agreed, the movie was a chore to watch.
 
Originally posted by: Aceshigh
Originally posted by: xSauronx
i saw this movie one and a half times....the half because they kept fvcking replaying what i just watched

and it pissed me off, it was interesting, but pissed me off so much that i didnt really enjoy it

Agreed, the movie was a chore to watch.
I suppose it could be considered a chore for the sort of person who doesn't watch foreign films because they don't like subtitles. 😛

Then again, I might be biased. I'm writing a literary criticism on it right now. 🙂

Rob
 
Whether or not Leonard was actually Sammy Jenkins and killed his own wife is one of the aspects of the movie that is still under debate. For instance, the idea as displayed in the film that he could be Sammy is dependent on the idea that there is a loophole in his condition. He clearly remembers that his wife was NOT diabetic before his incident, and the flashbacks he has of him shooting her up with the insulin would not have been accesible to his memory if she were to have become so after the incident, since he was not able to create ANY long term memories after that.

It is feasible, that having this story about Sammy Jenkins (an actual 3rd party character) related to him many times before, John G. uses this to convince Leonard that he really is nuts and that his wife is dead. Perhaps the motive is to keep him working for him to continue extorting criminals? Perhaps his wife was still alive (after all, she supposedly lived through the original incident, he just can't remember) and to keep Leonard from realizing that would keep him in the service of John G. This is my theory and would also explain the flash in the movie where you see Leaonard in bed with his wife with the final tatoo. (this scene could not have been a flashback, it could only have been a dream or a flash forward)

The other flashes where Sammy is replaced by Leonard himself for an instant and where Leonard has the needle with his wife, are instances of him doubting his self and his condition, which can be related to the whole argument about the disease being mental vs. physical in the Sammy Jenkins case. Very subliminal.

As for the chronology of the film, the first sequence is actually backwards, then from then on all of the colored sequences play forward in reverse order, and they are intertwined with the B&W sequences that flow in forward order. The black and white sequence actually takes place BEFORE the colored ones do chronologically, and if you watch closely in the final scene you will see it fade from black and white to color, with the poloroid photo. (Thanks to the above link for pointing this out)

Exceptionally well done movie, and I've only watched it twice so far. I would very much like to get the DVD for Christmas, this kind of thinking man's entertainment is rare these days.

🙂
 
I suppose it could be considered a chore for the sort of person who doesn't watch foreign films because they don't like subtitles.

You have no idea what sort of person I am.



My favorite movie happens to be foreign.
 
Originally posted by: Aceshigh
I suppose it could be considered a chore for the sort of person who doesn't watch foreign films because they don't like subtitles.

You have no idea what sort of person I am.

Apparently one with bad taste. 😀

 
Originally posted by: Aceshigh
I suppose it could be considered a chore for the sort of person who doesn't watch foreign films because they don't like subtitles.

You have no idea what sort of person I am.



My favorite movie happens to be foreign.
I never said that I knew what sort of person you were; I also said that I might be biased. Everyone I know who thought the movie was difficult to watch was plagued by a short attention span; they were worse than Lenny, if you ask me. They also happened to hate Kolya, Amelie, and CTHD - all because it took too much effort to read subtitles while watching a movie.
rolleye.gif


Why did you think it was a chore to watch?

Rob
 
Well, the main character was just very frustrating to watch. It didn't seem to have any flow for me, I know thats how the filmakers meant it to be, but it just didn't seem entertaining to me.
 
Everyone I know who thought the movie was difficult to watch was plagued by a short attention span; they were worse than Lenny, if you ask me. They also happened to hate Kolya, Amelie, and CTHD - all because it took too much effort to read subtitles while watching a movie.

Ah, now I understand what you meant.
 
Originally posted by: BeeVo
I just watched this movie for the second time and it is really bugging me the more I think about it.

POSSIBLE SPOILERS IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE MOVIE:

Just a few questions:
1. Is he Sammy Jenkins?
2. Is John Gammell just using him the whole time?
3. Anyone else notice at the very end when he is imagining his wife laying across his chest it says on his left peck "I've Done It" when in the rest of the movie it doesn't show it tattooed on him?

Also I want to hear your take on the whole movie.

Yes he is Sammy Jenkins
Yes John Gammell used him

You see it in the begning and not anywhere else because ... the movie is played backwards. You see the ending and then the rest of the movie shows you how it happened. So .. he prolly tatted himself after he figures it out but couldn't do it before, cause he didn't know.

Also check out his stolen car getting progressivly cleaner as the movie goes on.
 
Back
Top