thraashman
Lifer
- Apr 10, 2000
- 11,103
- 1,550
- 126
If it's Ted Cruz, I'd vote Democrat!
I'd vote Putin for US President over Rafael "Ted" Cruz. Hell, I'd vote Khameni (I'm not looking up how to spell it right).
If it's Ted Cruz, I'd vote Democrat!
Old story. Obama admin has been quite awful on press relations and freedom, this is well known among liberals and derided by libs, progs, Dems, etc. quite consistently. Notice how this report was performed by the mainstream "LIBERAL!" media.
I don't agree. I think she is the one making the decisions and Obama is the face we get to look at. He's proven himself to be less than bright. One dumb decision after another. Especially when it comes to foreign policy. If she's calling the shots he's a dumbass for listening to her and if she's not calling the shots he's a dumbass because it's coming from him.Meh...
I put her along the lines of Karl Rove with Bush. The media always has someone behind the scenes they want to put the blame on instead of the person making the decisions.
I'd vote Putin for US President over Rafael "Ted" Cruz. Hell, I'd vote Khameni (I'm not looking up how to spell it right).
He also used the word "imagine" about 40 times during his candidacy announcement....which we all know is code for "hope and change". I think he's onto something here!What if Ted announces he will be the most transparent administration in history?
Most transparent administration in history declassifies secret intelligence regarding Israel's nuclear capabilities: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/193175#.VRQ20OEpDcs
Yep. Bring back Gary Johnson.And I'm sure you're just overjoyed that Hillary will likely get the nomination as well. Libertarian is always an option...at least for me. Your choices appear to be a tad more limited....lol.
lol Yellow dogs always bark, but they never fail to line up at the trough when it counts.Nope, not happy that Hillary is a likely shoe-in, but given any of the repubs possible nominees, Ill hold my nose and vote for Hillary.
It does three things - increase the cost to the requester, slow down the process to give more time to manage the message, and make more time to conveniently lose, alter or classify the requested documents.Yet when challenged; 33% of the denials were then granted.
Seems like the policy is deny first if it could be embarrassing and then considered consequences when challenged if could be legit.
when requests from the New York Post are routinely getting shunted aside until challenged ...
