manimal
Lifer
- Mar 30, 2007
- 13,559
- 8
- 0
And Mr. President controls a portion of the world's supply, in this case deciding to reduce it, thus likely causing a global price increased to some extent.
Fern
Thus likely means your guessing right?
And Mr. President controls a portion of the world's supply, in this case deciding to reduce it, thus likely causing a global price increased to some extent.
Fern
Your short term memory is so bad that you should see a doctor. Crude Oil hit an all-time high of $145 per barrel in JUNE, 2008 after a very short run up. The free market adopted by essentially shutting down auto and truck sales, especially US manufacturers. That price spike coincides almost exactly with the beginning of what is now commonly known as the Great Recession.
Please don't use such obviously made up facts to support your rants.
PS-the only "liberal" calls I've seen for oil and gas futures regulation is a very commonsense call for a prohibition against naked futures. That makes a lot of sense to me in all futures markets, where our present poorly regulated systems allow future prices to be grossly distorted by market manipulators. The exact same thing is happening now in the silver and gold markets.
So do we import 100% of our oil? Or 0%? I don't want to hear another Democrat whine about dependency on foreign oil ever again, since we've cleared up in this thread that it simply isn't true.
Where should these "speculators" put their money, Craig? Should they just keep their money in cash while Bernanke runs the printing presses?
LOL, come on man, that's their whole shtick. If we could supply more of our own oil than it would step on their green push.
Tell that to the people of the Gulf coast and Alaska.
Standard Rightie rhetoric- the answer isn't to consume less, but rather to produce more, as if oil isn't a finite resource. Suck it out of the ground, blow it out of our tailpipes as fast as possible, because it won't matter when the rapture comes, correct?
If pigs had wings, they'd fly, and if we use up our own oil at a higher rate, we'll screw ourselves sooner than later. Both statements are true, but only one makes sense. Go figure.
How about those speculators have to take delivery of the commodity, in this case oil, they put their money in instead of doing the musical chair paper shuffle while real people pay for their greed at the pump.
Standard Rightie rhetoric- the answer isn't to consume less, but rather to produce more, as if oil isn't a finite resource. Suck it out of the ground, blow it out of our tailpipes as fast as possible, because it won't matter when the rapture comes, correct?
If pigs had wings, they'd fly, and if we use up our own oil at a higher rate, we'll screw ourselves sooner than later. Both statements are true, but only one makes sense. Go figure.
I live on the Gulf Coast, it's nothing like strip mining, and clear cutting.
Meanwhile, pretty much everyone in the world is drilling in the Gulf except for the United States and at the same time the United States is financing drilling in the Gulf by Petrobas of Brazil.
And of course george soros is a big investor in Petrobas.... what say you dmcowen674?
Thus likely means your guessing right?Originally Posted by Fern
And Mr. President controls a portion of the world's supply, in this case deciding to reduce it, thus likely causing a global price increased to some extent.
Fern
http://tripplecheck.wordpress.com/2...s-petrobras-obama-gulf-moratorium-conspiracy/
Beck is a jewaiting turd but a liar, imagine that?
Standard Rightie rhetoric- the answer isn't to consume less, but rather to produce more, as if oil isn't a finite resource. Suck it out of the ground, blow it out of our tailpipes as fast as possible, because it won't matter when the rapture comes, correct?
-snip-
