The majority of people have an above average number of legs.

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
The number of one/zero legged people is higher than the three or more legged people so the average number of legs on a human is likely 1.9xxxxxxxxxxxx

Most people have 2 legs, so most people are higher than average, congratulate yourself.
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Granted it is quite large, but it doesn't quite reach the ground so I'm not sure it qualifies as a leg.
 

blinblue

Senior member
Jul 7, 2006
889
0
76
I like this. Going to post this as my facebook status and see how many people get confused :)
 

dighn

Lifer
Aug 12, 2001
22,820
4
81
haha sounds ridiculous but is true.

wait are you making fun of amputees?! booo /pc committee
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
I like this. Going to post this as my facebook status and see how many people get confused :)

Am I the only one still trying to wrap my head around this???



I went back to Slew Foot's post and reread it so now I get it.
 
Last edited:

blinblue

Senior member
Jul 7, 2006
889
0
76
Am I the only one still trying to wrap my head around this???

Read Slew Foot's post

Basically, consider a group of 20 people, all have 2 legs except for one guy who has one. Consider the data set:
1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2
The average is
(1+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2)/20 = 1.95

The majority of the group has 2 legs, however 2>1.95, so the majority have more than the average number of legs.

Of course in real life the occurrence of <2 legs is rarer that 1/20, but the principle is the same. The average is probably something like 1.99998 or something like that. And 2 is still > than that
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Read Slew Foot's post

Basically, consider a group of 20 people, all have 2 legs except for one guy who has one. Consider the data set:
1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2
The average is
(1+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2)/20 = 1.95

The majority of the group has 2 legs, however 2>1.95, so the majority have more than the average number of legs.

Of course in real life the occurrence of <2 legs is rarer that 1/20, but the principle is the same. The average is probably something like 1.99998 or something like that. And 2 is still > than that

Yea I finally got it. Stupid arithmetic mean but thank you for dumbing it down for people like me that don't think with math all the time.
 

blinblue

Senior member
Jul 7, 2006
889
0
76
Yea I finally got it. Stupid arithmetic mean but thank you for dumbing it down for people like me that don't think with math all the time.

Good point, one could get all snarky back at this and point out that average could very well mean the median or mode (which in both of those cases would equal 2). But I'd imagine most people mean (no pun intended) "arithmetic mean" when they say "average"
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
Am I the only one still trying to wrap my head around this???



I went back to Slew Foot's post and reread it so now I get it.

I normally have trouble "getting it," but I understood this one the moment I read the topic title.
 

Leros

Lifer
Jul 11, 2004
21,867
7
81
The mass of my testicles is twice as much as the average American.

statistics are fun