K kermalou Diamond Member Jun 22, 2001 6,237 0 0 Apr 10, 2004 #1 am in the process of reading this book, what do you guys think?
R Regine Diamond Member Sep 11, 2000 3,668 0 0 Apr 10, 2004 #2 It is one of my favorites. "One sees clearly only with the heart. Anything essential is invisible to the eyes." I think that is one of my favorite quotes of all time.
It is one of my favorites. "One sees clearly only with the heart. Anything essential is invisible to the eyes." I think that is one of my favorite quotes of all time.
ohtwell Lifer Jan 6, 2002 14,516 9 81 Apr 10, 2004 #4 I've read it before, but I wasn't too impressed! : ) Amanda
K kermalou Diamond Member Jun 22, 2001 6,237 0 0 Apr 10, 2004 #5 "Nothing. I own them.... It does me the good of making me rich."
V veggiefrog Member Jan 4, 2004 194 0 0 Apr 10, 2004 #6 yeah it wasnt bad; it's one of my bf's fave books and he made me read it
V VTBigBear Platinum Member Jun 13, 2000 2,212 0 71 Apr 10, 2004 #7 ive read it.. but never found out why it was so popular
StageLeft No Lifer Sep 29, 2000 70,150 5 0 Apr 10, 2004 #8 I had to for french class back in school. It was in french, so I didn't understand it. I got the impression that it was pretty fruity.
I had to for french class back in school. It was in french, so I didn't understand it. I got the impression that it was pretty fruity.
Zim Hosein Super Moderator | Elite Member Super Moderator Nov 27, 1999 65,390 407 126 Apr 10, 2004 #9 I liked it a lot
Daishiki Golden Member Nov 9, 2001 1,943 36 91 Apr 10, 2004 #10 read it in 11th grade. nothing like the innocence and imagination of a child. we also read catcher in the rye to fit along with that
read it in 11th grade. nothing like the innocence and imagination of a child. we also read catcher in the rye to fit along with that
M mwtgg Lifer Dec 6, 2001 10,491 0 0 Apr 10, 2004 #11 I liked the book... It really made me think -- and at least it was much better than "Jonathan Livingston Seagull", oh boy was that book atrocious
I liked the book... It really made me think -- and at least it was much better than "Jonathan Livingston Seagull", oh boy was that book atrocious