• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

The James Bond like bunker for wikileaks data

13Gigatons

Diamond Member
Hmmm...

article-1337014-0C685E1B000005DC-868_634x419.jpg


article-1337014-0C668A17000005DC-550_634x651.jpg


article-1337014-0C6690C6000005DC-371_634x372.jpg


article-1337014-0C668887000005DC-754_634x636.jpg


article-1337014-0C6694E8000005DC-883_634x523.jpg


article-1337014-0C669713000005DC-876_634x862.jpg


story link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n-Assanges-subterranean-Bond-villain-den.html
 
wow.


the caption for the door made me lol... it's glass... it ain't solid.
 
Last edited:
wait what... I'm totally missing why they need all that. Both the hardware (really? racks and racks of servers?) and the backup etc etc. I thought they were hosting their shit elesewhere?

Something isn't right here.
 
wait what... I'm totally missing why they need all that. Both the hardware (really? racks and racks of servers?) and the backup etc etc. I thought they were hosting their shit elesewhere?

Something isn't right here.

This isn't wikileaks. It's an ISP that just so happens to have wikileaks as a customer.
 
This isn't wikileaks. It's an ISP that just so happens to have wikileaks as a customer.

This is what I figured, though I'm missing it in the article in the OP as it is clearly written to make it sound like THAT is actually "WikiLeaks" (which I knew could not be the truth).
 
wait what... I'm totally missing why they need all that. Both the hardware (really? racks and racks of servers?) and the backup etc etc. I thought they were hosting their shit elesewhere?

Something isn't right here.

edit: already stated.

I remember this facility being profiled a year or two ago. Pretty awesome setup.
 
wait what... I'm totally missing why they need all that. Both the hardware (really? racks and racks of servers?) and the backup etc etc. I thought they were hosting their shit elesewhere?

Something isn't right here.

The data center is owned by some other company, Wikileaks is just storing their data there.
 
The data center is owned by some other company, Wikileaks is just storing their data there.

Right I get it. That's 3 or 4 explainations now... and its pretty much what I assumed and figured. Though the article in the OP certainly paints a much different picture.
 
LOL, the data has to come out somewhere.

A simple snip here and a snip there would solve the problem right quick.
 
Back
Top