- Jul 7, 2008
- 5,558
- 25
- 91
http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/15/the-intel-upgrade-service-once-again-charging-you-50-to-do-stu/
How do you guys feel about this?
How do you guys feel about this?
Doesn't apply to most people on AT since enthusiasts don't usually buy such low-end CPUs
Here is the FAQ, it seems to be a permanent change to the motherboard bios, that most likely raises the multiplier and in some cases, turns on hyperthreading.
https://retailupgrades.intel.com/FAQ.aspx
Most of those aren't valid concerns IMO, considering the kind of people would would buy a CPU upgrade code probably aren't going to be digging around inside the system to replace the CPU or motherboard. In the event the board dies or something like that, I'd hope that when you sent it back in for repair or replacement, the OEM or Intel or someone would make sure the upgrade you paid for can be activated on the new board as well.Then that addresses the two concerns I mentioned. Unfortunately, it raises another issue: the CPU can't be separated from the motherboard. What if the board dies? What if just the BIOS goes bad? What if you want to upgrade the board?
Most of those aren't valid concerns IMO, considering the kind of people would would buy a CPU upgrade code probably aren't going to be digging around inside the system to replace the CPU or motherboard. In the event the board dies or something like that, I'd hope that when you sent it back in for repair or replacement, the OEM or Intel or someone would make sure the upgrade you paid for can be activated on the new board as well.
No, but a lot of us build low-end systems for acquaintances, friends, relatives, and customers.
These codes are only available for CPUs sold to OEMs, not CPUs sold through retail channels that end users can build systems with.I'd rather have $50 securely in my pocket than hoping Intel or the OEM will re-activate my upgrade.
Bottom line is that if this is aimed at convincing a system builder like me to use Intel rather than AMD CPUs on the low end of the budget range, it misses the target in my mind.
These codes are only available for CPUs sold to OEMs, not CPUs sold through retail channels that end users can build systems with.
And if anything I'd think this would make Intel more appealing than AMD for low end systems. With AMD if you want to upgrade you'd have to spend more money on a new CPU and then install it yourself or pay someone to install it (more likely for your average user). I think what Intel is offering is a nice option for some people, though. They can buy a cheaper system now and then upgrade the CPU relatively cheaply later on if they find themselves needing more power. Or they could do it the conventional way and just get a faster CPU, but having more upgrade options is never a bad thing IMO.
Ah, I see. In the context of HPs, Dells, or whatever low-end desktops, then yes, this is a good idea because it's one more upgrade option.
then all the people who need more ram, and the ones who need to uninstall all their IE toolbars and 20 virus scan programs set to scan on each and every bootup, can buy this upgrade and wonder why their pc isn't faster!!!
some people dont play games and they keep their machines for several years. for those folks this might be a good alternative to building a whole new machine. one of my machines is a pentium 6300. if i could pay $50 to upgrade it to a pentium 6800 i would definitely do that
Oh, you honestly think an extra 200MHz is going to make a 5-year old chip not suck?