Stiganator
Platinum Member
So its this great big debate right. Well it is really quite simple. Listen to me. The Stiganator or Emporer Stiganator as I shall hence forth be known, shall provide the following guidelines.
If you don't like the concept of "gayness" (and I don't mean frolicking in a field unless of course its a field of sausages) , don't be gay! Simple I know but some may or may not realize it.
The United States stands for freedom. Whether you're white or any other "dark" group that gets discriminated against at airports, you have the same rights (Do you see the contradiction?) The current debate arises from the fact that some people think "gayness" is fine and others feel is isn't.
Now the phrase "with liberty and justice for all." comes to mind. It also says one nation under God. Under God's watch, under God's protection, under God's genitals, not clear there really. That being said, the case that covers all the bases needs to be taken, which is the most wide reaching case, so I feel that would be under God's watch. Meaning of course that some greater power is watching over the US of A. That is all. It's like watching my hampster run on his little wheel. I don't intervene, unless he's gonna kill himself. Back to the liberty and justice for all thing, so there isn't a clause saying liberty and justice for white people, liberty and justice for women, liberty and justice for everyone but that guy over there*points*. So it is a cover all scenario again. So what we have here is liberty and justice for every person in the USA.
Now let's take a quick flashback 2000 years or so. So theoretically (and it is theoretically, since none of us are >2000 years of age) there was a guy named Jesus (JC). He was spreading the good word about being nice and all that jazz and there were guys following him around documenting his works (again supposedly).
Also during that time, science and technology was not so good. People died from very simple things. Kinda sh*tty I know. So JC was starting to get kinda popular, people were all like "hey, these Romans are kinda d*cks, I think JC's way is better." So some ingenious people back in the day could very well have jumped on the band wagon. Just like modern day rock bands. A small band opens for Metallica and they get huge publicity. Same thing here. The smart guys realize, "Mental note, sex with other men not as good for tribe as advertise...Good God Moses can you shut up for one God D*mn second I can't even hear my own inner monolog...Judas seems to like that Judd a bit much, but who can blame him when Rachel is soo *ughh*, I certainly don't want to hit that, but maybe I can get Judas to go back. Hmmmm? I got it. Everyone here believes JC like hes the son of this God guy. I got it!, I'll just add a little thing in the book they all read about dudes not banging other dudes. If worse comes to worse I can just say "God" told me in a dream or some sh*t." So he adds the homo ono clause, and while he's at it says "hey that veronica is a minx, but she's gonna die if she eats all that stinky pork, I'll add something about that too." And so imagine as many great smart *sses like our imaginary friend keep adding in stipulations we get a complete Bible.
Just in case you suck at reading comprehension, I'm saying the Bible is a medium for conveying opinons or methodologies. Now, I know that there are nay sayers out there who will say God willed the existance of the Bible and that's fine and dandy, but G-dog isn't willing any translators or printing presses, because otherwise there wouldn't be 19 versions of the Bible.
Ok, flashing forward again. In the past 200 years, science and technology has boomed. Pretty much anything is possible with the current distribution channels. In these last hundred or so years more and more laws have been past that are not well related to well being of any sort. They are based on the bill writers personal beliefs which should be forsaken when office is taken. Remember bill writers represent the people of their district, whether it is for or against there own personal wishes. The personal beliefs have become laws and friends have helped each other out till. The government is just one personal agenda on top of another like some bizarre orgy of organizational books. Religious beleifs and now being pushed as law!
This shouldn't be the case. The basic laws are all covered. Don't steal. Don't kill. Don't touch that 14 year old Etc. All the things needed to keep society moving in a forward direction.
Solution:
There should be a voting website that you can submit a vote on issues. The topic goes up and is available for a certain amount of time. That topic can have three possible votes, yes, no, undecided. If the yes's of a state exceed 66% of the votes of that state and at least 25% of the total possible votes for the state. That state is marked as a yes. Otherwise if the 25% stipulation isn't met it is marked as a pass with appeal opportunities. So assuming the criteria are met the guideline is passed on the state level and on the national level the state is marked as a yes state. Now if 85% of the states are yes states, the guideline can be set nationally with the same stipulation on total votes etc. If the guideline isn't nationally accepted it can still be implemented on a state level. This can be applied at city, district, state, and national levels as you see here. It allows for laws to be passed as well as for your say to count. It can be implemented for election of officials or replacement of the system all together. And thing of all the IT jobs! 🙂
That's all for now.
If you don't like the concept of "gayness" (and I don't mean frolicking in a field unless of course its a field of sausages) , don't be gay! Simple I know but some may or may not realize it.
The United States stands for freedom. Whether you're white or any other "dark" group that gets discriminated against at airports, you have the same rights (Do you see the contradiction?) The current debate arises from the fact that some people think "gayness" is fine and others feel is isn't.
Now the phrase "with liberty and justice for all." comes to mind. It also says one nation under God. Under God's watch, under God's protection, under God's genitals, not clear there really. That being said, the case that covers all the bases needs to be taken, which is the most wide reaching case, so I feel that would be under God's watch. Meaning of course that some greater power is watching over the US of A. That is all. It's like watching my hampster run on his little wheel. I don't intervene, unless he's gonna kill himself. Back to the liberty and justice for all thing, so there isn't a clause saying liberty and justice for white people, liberty and justice for women, liberty and justice for everyone but that guy over there*points*. So it is a cover all scenario again. So what we have here is liberty and justice for every person in the USA.
Now let's take a quick flashback 2000 years or so. So theoretically (and it is theoretically, since none of us are >2000 years of age) there was a guy named Jesus (JC). He was spreading the good word about being nice and all that jazz and there were guys following him around documenting his works (again supposedly).
Also during that time, science and technology was not so good. People died from very simple things. Kinda sh*tty I know. So JC was starting to get kinda popular, people were all like "hey, these Romans are kinda d*cks, I think JC's way is better." So some ingenious people back in the day could very well have jumped on the band wagon. Just like modern day rock bands. A small band opens for Metallica and they get huge publicity. Same thing here. The smart guys realize, "Mental note, sex with other men not as good for tribe as advertise...Good God Moses can you shut up for one God D*mn second I can't even hear my own inner monolog...Judas seems to like that Judd a bit much, but who can blame him when Rachel is soo *ughh*, I certainly don't want to hit that, but maybe I can get Judas to go back. Hmmmm? I got it. Everyone here believes JC like hes the son of this God guy. I got it!, I'll just add a little thing in the book they all read about dudes not banging other dudes. If worse comes to worse I can just say "God" told me in a dream or some sh*t." So he adds the homo ono clause, and while he's at it says "hey that veronica is a minx, but she's gonna die if she eats all that stinky pork, I'll add something about that too." And so imagine as many great smart *sses like our imaginary friend keep adding in stipulations we get a complete Bible.
Just in case you suck at reading comprehension, I'm saying the Bible is a medium for conveying opinons or methodologies. Now, I know that there are nay sayers out there who will say God willed the existance of the Bible and that's fine and dandy, but G-dog isn't willing any translators or printing presses, because otherwise there wouldn't be 19 versions of the Bible.
Ok, flashing forward again. In the past 200 years, science and technology has boomed. Pretty much anything is possible with the current distribution channels. In these last hundred or so years more and more laws have been past that are not well related to well being of any sort. They are based on the bill writers personal beliefs which should be forsaken when office is taken. Remember bill writers represent the people of their district, whether it is for or against there own personal wishes. The personal beliefs have become laws and friends have helped each other out till. The government is just one personal agenda on top of another like some bizarre orgy of organizational books. Religious beleifs and now being pushed as law!
This shouldn't be the case. The basic laws are all covered. Don't steal. Don't kill. Don't touch that 14 year old Etc. All the things needed to keep society moving in a forward direction.
Solution:
There should be a voting website that you can submit a vote on issues. The topic goes up and is available for a certain amount of time. That topic can have three possible votes, yes, no, undecided. If the yes's of a state exceed 66% of the votes of that state and at least 25% of the total possible votes for the state. That state is marked as a yes. Otherwise if the 25% stipulation isn't met it is marked as a pass with appeal opportunities. So assuming the criteria are met the guideline is passed on the state level and on the national level the state is marked as a yes state. Now if 85% of the states are yes states, the guideline can be set nationally with the same stipulation on total votes etc. If the guideline isn't nationally accepted it can still be implemented on a state level. This can be applied at city, district, state, and national levels as you see here. It allows for laws to be passed as well as for your say to count. It can be implemented for election of officials or replacement of the system all together. And thing of all the IT jobs! 🙂
That's all for now.
