The future has arrived

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,770
126
Meh, the novelty would wear off in a day. Why didn't Apple name the person something simple like "Kim" instead of "Alexis" , much easier to remember and speak.
 

NoTine42

Golden Member
Sep 30, 2013
1,387
78
91
Meh, the novelty would wear off in a day. Why didn't Apple name the person something simple like "Kim" instead of "Alexis" , much easier to remember and speak.
I'm sure Apple has some 4-letter names for Amazon's Alexa :D
Right now, you can change the wake word settings to Echo or Amazon.
 

Ruptga

Lifer
Aug 3, 2006
10,246
207
106
Meh, the novelty would wear off in a day. Why didn't Apple name the person something simple like "Kim" instead of "Alexis" , much easier to remember and speak.
Out of my ass guess: Alexis is a relatively uncommon name, and they didn't want it getting triggered by casual conversation. Its sounds are also hard and distinct, which probably helps with speech recognition.
 

pete6032

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2010
8,293
3,700
136
Meh, the novelty would wear off in a day. Why didn't Apple name the person something simple like "Kim" instead of "Alexis" , much easier to remember and speak.
Could not be used in Korea.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,741
456
126
Out of my ass guess: Alexis is a relatively uncommon name, and they didn't want it getting triggered by casual conversation. Its sounds are also hard and distinct, which probably helps with speech recognition.
Bingo

These decisions aren't made randomly, there's thought put into these trigger words.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
71,091
13,988
126
www.anyf.ca
You would think they would have made it so you can customize to any name though. So it's user's choice if they end up picking a name that's common.
 

Ruptga

Lifer
Aug 3, 2006
10,246
207
106
You would think they would have made it so you can customize to any name though. So it's user's choice if they end up picking a name that's common.
Why? This is simpler, and it makes it much easier for them to build a brand. Nobody wants to talk to their intelligent personal assistant and knowledge navigator, they want to talk to Siri.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
71,091
13,988
126
www.anyf.ca
Why? This is simpler, and it makes it much easier for them to build a brand. Nobody wants to talk to their intelligent personal assistant and knowledge navigator, they want to talk to Siri.

Well they can still default it to whatever, but adding the ability to change it would be super easy. I'd want to call it something cool like "hal" or "computer". Computer would be kind of cool. "Computer, set heat to 20 degrees and run diagnostic of furnace".
 

Charmonium

Lifer
May 15, 2015
10,622
3,596
136
"Hal" would be cool. And program the response to be a man's voice. "I'm sorry Dave but I can't order that custom EEPROM for my control circuit."
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
71,091
13,988
126
www.anyf.ca
Yeah would be cool to program it to open/lock doors too. "I'm sorry dave, I'm afraid I can't do that" "But I need to get to work, unlock the front door!".

One of these days I actually want to experiment with some kind of custom speech recognition, I don't actually trust stuff like the echo or pretty much any consumer product, but something that runs soley on my home server would be fun. In general it would just be pre programmed commands, but could add some AI to it too. At most it would just be something to impress friends though. :p

I have been brainstorming my home automation system though, my current setup is not greatly modular and is already a mess of wires. I was going for using rackmount space, but something like that is really more well suited in a nema cabinet with din rails.
 

Charmonium

Lifer
May 15, 2015
10,622
3,596
136
I just got a Smart Things hub and it's pretty simple to use. It automatically links up to the cloud and location services so you can control devices from anywhere and since everything is pollable you know whether things are on, off and what their state is. I'm just getting into it so I don't know a lot about it yet but it's zwave based and seems easy AF to use. The hardest thing I've had to do so far was to had a secondary controller which is a hand held remote and even that was pretty simple once I realized that I had to do it through the hub.

I have a ton of old x10 crap and I need to migrate. I've been waiting for things to gel around a standard and for there to be decent security. I don't really keep up with this stuff any more but check periodically and it seems that zwave is fairly mature now with most of functionality and features you need. Plus you can get security systems that integrate that along with video surveillance.