- Mar 20, 2000
- 102,396
- 8,559
- 126
we've got:
architect (current council member)
corporate lawyer (former city attorney)
and
accountant (city controller)
running for mayor, and they all like each other so much that they don't disagree on anything. the previous mayor hasn't left any big holes or done anything particularly controversial, so they're all basically running on 'the status quo is great, so we'll just build on it.' the only people who really disagree with the status quo live outside the city limits so their opinions don't really count. the things each candidate seem to be pushing are getting rid of waste, more officers on the street, and less congestion, which basically are the default positions of houston elections. they won't even debate each other anymore because it ends up being a giant love-in and no on wants to watch that when practically anything else is on. it's a bad sign when politicians don't even want to hear themselves talk.
architect (current council member)
corporate lawyer (former city attorney)
and
accountant (city controller)
running for mayor, and they all like each other so much that they don't disagree on anything. the previous mayor hasn't left any big holes or done anything particularly controversial, so they're all basically running on 'the status quo is great, so we'll just build on it.' the only people who really disagree with the status quo live outside the city limits so their opinions don't really count. the things each candidate seem to be pushing are getting rid of waste, more officers on the street, and less congestion, which basically are the default positions of houston elections. they won't even debate each other anymore because it ends up being a giant love-in and no on wants to watch that when practically anything else is on. it's a bad sign when politicians don't even want to hear themselves talk.