The faking of the moon landing.... i have a simple question

Esquire

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,372
0
71
are there pictures? i cant track down info

please don't post a tweeked, "Dude ur a loser it wasn't faked"

ok thanks
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Would we even be able to see the stuff we left behind from this far away?
 

Esquire

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,372
0
71
i would think we'd as humans would have scanned every inch of the moon... high res google earth like stuff
 

Scarpozzi

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
26,391
1,780
126
Originally posted by: mugs
Would we even be able to see the stuff we left behind from this far away?
Yes, but it would take one heck of a lens.

I will be honest and say that a Saturn 5 rocket could definitely reach the moon. The whole thing is solid fuel. The modern day shuttles could never get there. They burn too much fuel just leaving the Earth's atmosphere and don't have enough left over to make the long trip to the moon. It makes me want to ask the question....what proof is there that it was faked? (aside from the claims that there was a studio somewhere that it was filmed in) :p
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Well unless aliens put that laser mirror array in the Sea of Tranquility, nope. It's there. (Apollo 11) Been there since 1969.
 

Heisenberg

Lifer
Dec 21, 2001
10,621
1
0
Originally posted by: MS Dawn
Well unless aliens put that laser mirror array in the Sea of Tranquility, nope. It's there. (Apollo 11) Been there since 1969.
Don't you know? There are no such things as "lasers", and all the "scientists" who supposedly bounce them off those mirrors on a daily basis are just paid actors.
 

yhelothar

Lifer
Dec 11, 2002
18,409
39
91
I read sometime back that the hubble has the power to resolve a footstep on the moon.
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
Originally posted by: MS Dawn
Well unless aliens put that laser mirror array in the Sea of Tranquility, nope. It's there. (Apollo 11) Been there since 1969.

There you have it, folks. Undeniable proof. You could probably go to one of any number of observatories and shine a laser on the mirrors yourself.
 

jadinolf

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
20,952
3
81
Originally posted by: Esquire
are there pictures? i cant track down info

please don't post a tweeked, "Dude ur a loser it wasn't faked"

ok thanks

We were never there. The movies were made on a sound stage in Culver City. I thought everyone knew that.
 

Analog

Lifer
Jan 7, 2002
12,755
3
0
Here's another from NASA:

Image above: Apollo 17 Landing Site. The top image showcases Hubble Space Telescope's first high-resolution ultraviolet and visible imaging of the Apollo 17 site in the moon's Taurus-Littrow Valley. Humans last walked and drove on the lunar surface here in December 1972 (bottom image). The red X in the top Hubble image pinpoints the Apollo 17 touch-down position. Click on image for high resolution
Credit: NASA/ESA/HST Moon Team

http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/hubble_moon.html
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
It's fairly simple: the people running things like the Hubble are smart enough to realize that simply pointing their telescope at the moon to show a high res photo of footprints will do nothing more than get the conspiracy nuts to say "yeah, sure. They're just showing pictures taken from the scaffolding above the sound stage. See, you can see the shadow on the ground of..." Plus, the scientists can't be bothered with wasting their time appeasing a small group of nutcases. It's sort of like Listerine... kills 99.9% of bacteria. In this case, it's the .1% that can't be bothered with.
 

yhelothar

Lifer
Dec 11, 2002
18,409
39
91
Originally posted by: Analog
Here's another from NASA:

Image above: Apollo 17 Landing Site. The top image showcases Hubble Space Telescope's first high-resolution ultraviolet and visible imaging of the Apollo 17 site in the moon's Taurus-Littrow Valley. Humans last walked and drove on the lunar surface here in December 1972 (bottom image). The red X in the top Hubble image pinpoints the Apollo 17 touch-down position. Click on image for high resolution
Credit: NASA/ESA/HST Moon Team

http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/hubble_moon.html

doesn't seem to show anything
 

Esquire

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,372
0
71
but seriously, i would have thought that they would have hi super res photoed the moon b4 today.... i mean its ripe 4 the pic in. especially if u want to build there
 

jadinolf

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
20,952
3
81
Originally posted by: Analog
Here's another from NASA:

Image above: Apollo 17 Landing Site. The top image showcases Hubble Space Telescope's first high-resolution ultraviolet and visible imaging of the Apollo 17 site in the moon's Taurus-Littrow Valley. Humans last walked and drove on the lunar surface here in December 1972 (bottom image). The red X in the top Hubble image pinpoints the Apollo 17 touch-down position. Click on image for high resolution
Credit: NASA/ESA/HST Moon Team

http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/hubble_moon.html

That's not even a fair PhotoChop. ;)
 

Old Hippie

Diamond Member
Oct 8, 2005
6,361
1
0
There was no faking of the moon landing. At that time there was a major space race between Russia and the USA. Do you actually think they would have turned a blind eye to that secenario? Get real and move on to another conspiracy theory.
please don't post a tweeked, "Dude ur a loser it wasn't faked"
OK, I won't.