THE FACTS ON HUMVEE ARMOR

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
THE FACTS ON HUMVEE ARMOR

Thursday, Lieutenant General R. Steven Whitcomb,Commander, Third Army "Patton's Own,"
and Coalition Forces Land Component Command, answered some questions, regarding the
armoring of vehicles in Iraq, including humvess.

These are some of the facts the three star General shared with the press:

"Congress has provided in the neighborhood of about $1.2 billion since last year strictly to armor
our vehicles"

"Up-armored humvees... is a vehicle that is produced in a factory back in the United States and it
essentially gives you protection, both glass and on the armament on the side, front, rear, sides, top
and bottom. If you'll think of a protection in a bubble, that's kind of what the level-one up-
armored humvee gives you."

"Back in August of 2003, we were producing about 30 of those vehicles a month. We're in the
category now of over 400 per month being produced. The requirement that we've got from
Multinational Corps Iraq and Multinational Force Iraq, General Casey and General Tom Metz, are
for about 8,100 up-armored humvees. We've provided a little under 6,000 up-armored
humvees to the force to date."

(Started using) "add-on kits that we might be able to produce that gave that vehicle additional
protection.We call that level-two armor, and it's better known probably most places as add-on
armor. It is factory produced, so it's built under controlled conditions, and then it's either -- can be
put on back in the states. But we've got 10 sites here in the theater, a couple here in Kuwait,
and eight sites up in Iraq itself where we can bolt on, add this armor to existing unarmored
vehicles. It gives you protection front, rear and sides, glass. It does not give protection at the
top or at the bottom of the vehicle. So it gives you better than what you have with no
protection on a humvee, but not quite the level-one protection."

"We looked at a stop-gap measure, a bridge, if you will, till we got the factory-produced level two
and the level one protection for our vehicles, and that's what we call level-three hardening.(It
consists of) taking steel plates that have been approved, make sure that they've got the type of
minimal protection. Our real focus for the level-three armor is not the humvees, it's really the
series of trucks that the Army uses in combat operations."

"Right now...we've got about 30,000 wheeled vehicles in our theater -- in Iraq and Afghanistan and
other areas."
level one, about 6,000 vehicles;
level two, about 10,000 vehicles;
almost 4,500 vehicles that have the level- three protection
8,000 (vehicles) do not have some type of armor protection on them.

"Of those vehicles that don't, some number of them are things like tool trucks, communication
vans or vehicles that don't leave the base camp. In other words, they're trucked up into Iraq --
or in cases before what we're doing now, were driven up into Iraq -- and they go onto a base
camp, and that's where they spend most of their time."

"The humvee was a vehicle that was not designed to afford armor protection, nor were most
of our trucks. They were designed as cargo carriers. The only up-armored humvees, the high-end
ones, we had were for our military police forces. They were not for use by -- as we see them used
today with the numbers of forces."

"Add-on armoring runs anywhere from about a thousand pounds of steel plating up to about 4,000
pounds of additional weight. So a lot of our vehicles, as you point out, are not designed -- their
engines aren't designed to carry perhaps an additional ton of weight, the suspension and the
transmission."

"I am not seeing constraints on resources that are -- allow us to do that, with the exception
of, as I say, level one and -- primarily because you're producing vehicles and a certain amount of
law of physics is involved here. It's not necessarily just money; it's a production capacity to be
able to build more."

"When you combine the 6,000 and the almost 10,000, we're in relatively good shape humvee-
wise."

"The other thing that we've got -- and I won't talk about it because it is very sensitive -- is we're
leveraging technology, how to detect where IEDs are, who's using them, how they're being
set off and those kinds of things so we could go out there early and kill those guys before they're
able to execute."

Regarding the soldier who asked Secretary Rumsfeld the armor question, General Whitcomb said:
"What I think Specialist Wilson(soldier that popped the humvee question on Rumsfeld) was
probably talking about is going through a facility that we've got that takes vehicles of two types;
one, it takes vehicles that have been hit in combat and can't be fixed in Iraq and we bring them
back here into Kuwait and we either fix them or we take parts off them that we can use. And
some of those parts may, in fact, be the level-three armor, the steel plating that we either take off
and put into stacks that we'll reuse, or that my suspicion -- and it's a suspicion only -- is that
Specialist Wilson and his crew came in and found a vehicle or found some of that stuff and was
taking it to add on to their vehicles."

SOURCE: (U.S. Department of Defense)

Here some other facts, compiled from various sources:

Today 77% of Humvees in Iraq are armored

9,386 armor kits shipped to Iraq

9,143 have been installed (97%)

Armor Holdings (AH:NYSE) said it could boost its output of "up-armored" Humvees by as
much as 22 percent per month to 550 from 450 now.

The cost of installing the Humvee armor at the factory is $58,000 a vehicle.

Link
 

Forsythe

Platinum Member
May 2, 2004
2,825
0
0
What's up with you lately? Whats with the need to prove yourself so tremendously?
 

Rogue

Banned
Jan 28, 2000
5,774
0
0
So I assume you have a better, more upstanding source of factual information such as this?

Looking at this information and knowing the people involved I can say that nothing in here sounds inflated or false. General Thomas Metz used to be the Commanding General here at Fort Riley immediately before taking the job in Iraq and I can say that he's always been soldier oriented. I can also say that the Military Police units here on post left their up-armored HMMWVs in Iraq when they came back. I have been trained to drive an up-armored HMMWV and I can say that they are a different chassis and platform and that simply adding armor plating to the majority of standard HMMWVs in theater is a bad idea. The desert is a hard enough environment on vehicles, add in combat loads and everything else and simply adding a bunch of plating and armor to them is only going to cause them to be unreliable in combat.
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
So, is that good enough ? I don't think so.

If we weren't ready to fight this war, why did we start it when we did ? failure one.

Why didn't we plan for the situation we are now in ? failure two.

Why has it taken 2 or 3 times longer than it should have to correct this ? failure three.


The answer is we are being led by an administration that has never made a mistake. Everything is going along perfectly, according to God's plans.


Anyone who questions this is a traitor and/or a blasphemer.

 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
The apologist spew from Rip &amp; Co can be summed up like so: <pathetic whine> But...but...but... we're doing all we can. So many vehicles have been armored .... this isn't a failure in the war planning .... stop questioning our crusade ....
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Well, attacking the source didn't work out too well, so it now seems they are in the attack the messenger(poster) stage coupled with more red-faced anti-Bush rants. Go figure.

Looks like PEST is more widespread than I thought...

CsG
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Well, attacking the source didn't work out too well, so it now seems they are in the attack the messenger(poster) stage coupled with more red-faced anti-Bush rants. Go figure.

Looks like PEST is more widespread than I thought...

CsG


What "they" are you talking about ?

 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Originally posted by: Czar
that is one of the worst sources I have ever seen

His other source for "good things you don't hear about iraq" believes in the loch ness monster.

They have pictures and everything! ... that's better news than the humvee armour
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Well, attacking the source didn't work out too well, so it now seems they are in the attack the messenger(poster) stage coupled with more red-faced anti-Bush rants. Go figure.

Looks like PEST is more widespread than I thought...

CsG
Translation: Nothing but GOOD news coming out of Iraq, folks. Nothing to see here people. Move along. Stop questioning the crusade.
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: Czar
that is one of the worst sources I have ever seen

His other source for "good things you don't hear about iraq" believes in the loch ness monster.

They have pictures and everything! ... that's better news than the humvee armour

too many people belive what they want to belive and not what is :(
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
a) why add armour after all combat operations are over...and the "mission accomplished"

b) if armour production is at 400 today and 30 in aug 2003...shows how prepared for the war they were...OR maybe they are just doing now because of public outcry.

c) you shouldnt be in iraq anways.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: Riprorin
SOURCE: (U.S. Department of Defense)

Here some other facts, compiled from various sources:

Today 77% of Humvees in Iraq are armored

9,386 armor kits shipped to Iraq

9,143 have been installed (97%)

Armor Holdings (AH:NYSE) said it could boost its output of "up-armored" Humvees by as
much as 22 percent per month to 550 from 450 now.

The cost of installing the Humvee armor at the factory is $58,000 a vehicle.

Link

I'd rather know why didn't they have all this when they first went in; although, that would be like asking why didn't all go in with bulletproof vests and helmets.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Well, attacking the source didn't work out too well, so it now seems they are in the attack the messenger(poster) stage coupled with more red-faced anti-Bush rants. Go figure.

Looks like PEST is more widespread than I thought...

CsG
Translation: Nothing but GOOD news coming out of Iraq, folks. Nothing to see here people. Move along. Stop questioning the crusade.

Wrong. What we have here is a bunch of whiners who are focusing on so-called "negatives" and getting themselves worked up about it while at the same time ignoring/dismissing the FACTS.

Hey, if that's how you get yourself to sleep at night - so be it.:)

CsG
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Well, attacking the source didn't work out too well, so it now seems they are in the attack the messenger(poster) stage coupled with more red-faced anti-Bush rants. Go figure.

Looks like PEST is more widespread than I thought...

CsG
Translation: Nothing but GOOD news coming out of Iraq, folks. Nothing to see here people. Move along. Stop questioning the crusade.

Wrong. What we have here is a bunch of whiners who are focusing on so-called "negatives" and getting themselves worked up about it while at the same time ignoring/dismissing the FACTS.

Hey, if that's how you get yourself to sleep at night - so be it.:)

CsG

Usually thinking things are better than they are helps people sleep at night.
DealMonkey has looked at the facts and has come to the logical solution that the crusade was not warrented.

Meanwhile you guys are pulling supposed "good news" off some of the crappiest sites sites i've ever seen (believing in the loch ness monster...come on now...that's a long way from "FACTS")

You are trying to put a positive spin on it so YOU can sleep at night. I feel no guilt as i was against the war...the american deaths and casualtes are on you conscience...you supported the war.

grab for anything you can to make it all look good...even if it means turning to the low brow sites.
seems like you and rip are out to prove something...
sorry i just go by the facts...and that does not include info from sites that believe in fictional beings.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Well, attacking the source didn't work out too well, so it now seems they are in the attack the messenger(poster) stage coupled with more red-faced anti-Bush rants. Go figure.

Looks like PEST is more widespread than I thought...

CsG
Translation: Nothing but GOOD news coming out of Iraq, folks. Nothing to see here people. Move along. Stop questioning the crusade.

Wrong. What we have here is a bunch of whiners who are focusing on so-called "negatives" and getting themselves worked up about it while at the same time ignoring/dismissing the FACTS.

Hey, if that's how you get yourself to sleep at night - so be it.:)

CsG

Usually thinking things are better than they are helps people sleep at night.
DealMonkey has looked at the facts and has come to the logical solution that the crusade was not warrented.

Meanwhile you guys are pulling supposed "good news" off some of the crappiest sites sites i've ever seen (believing in the loch ness monster...come on now...that's a long way from "FACTS")

You are trying to put a positive spin on it so YOU can sleep at night. I feel no guilt as i was against the war...the american deaths and casualtes are on you conscience...you supported the war.

grab for anything you can to make it all look good...even if it means turning to the low brow sites.
seems like you and rip are out to prove something...
sorry i just go by the facts...and that does not include info from sites that believe in fictional beings.

Think what you wish - but I'm not the one bleating about how bad things are every day. Why exactly do people do that? PEST? (pre and post) That's as good of a guess as any - besides plain old partisanship.

I'm not trying to make war look good - however there is plenty of GOOD news coming from Iraq that people like you who look at things from a negative angle want to ignore.

Meh - keep on attacking the source instead of addressing the FACTS. :)

CsG
 

ntdz

Diamond Member
Aug 5, 2004
6,989
0
0
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
The apologist spew from Rip &amp; Co can be summed up like so: <pathetic whine> But...but...but... we're doing all we can. So many vehicles have been armored .... this isn't a failure in the war planning .... stop questioning our crusade ....

and the spew from from you and Co can be summed up like this... <Pathetic Whine> But...but...but... it's not a mandate, its not mandate, he only won by 3.5 million votes, not a mandate. Bush stole the election, we need a recount in Ohio, but not Penn or Wisconsin where the vote margin is closer (coincidently Kerry won there). Dare I say it? Hypocrites.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Well, attacking the source didn't work out too well, so it now seems they are in the attack the messenger(poster) stage coupled with more red-faced anti-Bush rants. Go figure.

Looks like PEST is more widespread than I thought...

CsG
Translation: Nothing but GOOD news coming out of Iraq, folks. Nothing to see here people. Move along. Stop questioning the crusade.

Wrong. What we have here is a bunch of whiners who are focusing on so-called "negatives" and getting themselves worked up about it while at the same time ignoring/dismissing the FACTS.

Hey, if that's how you get yourself to sleep at night - so be it.:)

CsG

Usually thinking things are better than they are helps people sleep at night.
DealMonkey has looked at the facts and has come to the logical solution that the crusade was not warrented.

Meanwhile you guys are pulling supposed "good news" off some of the crappiest sites sites i've ever seen (believing in the loch ness monster...come on now...that's a long way from "FACTS")

You are trying to put a positive spin on it so YOU can sleep at night. I feel no guilt as i was against the war...the american deaths and casualtes are on you conscience...you supported the war.

grab for anything you can to make it all look good...even if it means turning to the low brow sites.
seems like you and rip are out to prove something...
sorry i just go by the facts...and that does not include info from sites that believe in fictional beings.

Think what you wish - but I'm not the one bleating about how bad things are every day. Why exactly do people do that? PEST? (pre and post) That's as good of a guess as any - besides plain old partisanship.

I'm not trying to make war look good - however there is plenty of GOOD news coming from Iraq that people like you who look at things from a negative angle want to ignore.

Meh - keep on attacking the source instead of addressing the FACTS. :)

CsG

Of course there is good news coming from Iraq, no one that I can see is trying to make this thread into a "Iraq is 100% bad and nothing good is happening" whine. But what I DO see is Rip and you glossing over our troops being killed because they have improperly armored vehicles with "well SOME of the vehicles are armored" from Rip and dismissing the deaths as "so called negatives" from you. How well you guys "support the troops", aren't they the ones "whining" about armor, or did I imagine that?

You might not be "bleating" about how bad things are, but you are a much worse kind of whiner, the appologist. You claim you aren't trying to make the war look good, but all you do is focus on the good news (well SOME of our soldiers aren't dying in improperly armored vehicles) and dismiss anyone even talking about the bad stuff as partisan bleaters. Here's a hint, not everyone who talks about ways our soldiers can be safer does so because they hate America or some such crap. They do it because they honestly don't see a reason for our soldiers to be dying due to being improperly equipped.

You want some FACTS? How many soldiers died in Iraq since the start of the war due to improperly armored vehicles? In other words, if all the vehicles in Iraq had been as properly armored as possible, how many American soldiers would be alive or unwounded today? I'm not sure myself what the number would be, but I'm willing to bet it's significant.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Well, attacking the source didn't work out too well, so it now seems they are in the attack the messenger(poster) stage coupled with more red-faced anti-Bush rants. Go figure.

Looks like PEST is more widespread than I thought...

CsG
Translation: Nothing but GOOD news coming out of Iraq, folks. Nothing to see here people. Move along. Stop questioning the crusade.

Wrong. What we have here is a bunch of whiners who are focusing on so-called "negatives" and getting themselves worked up about it while at the same time ignoring/dismissing the FACTS.

Hey, if that's how you get yourself to sleep at night - so be it.:)

CsG

Usually thinking things are better than they are helps people sleep at night.
DealMonkey has looked at the facts and has come to the logical solution that the crusade was not warrented.

Meanwhile you guys are pulling supposed "good news" off some of the crappiest sites sites i've ever seen (believing in the loch ness monster...come on now...that's a long way from "FACTS")

You are trying to put a positive spin on it so YOU can sleep at night. I feel no guilt as i was against the war...the american deaths and casualtes are on you conscience...you supported the war.

grab for anything you can to make it all look good...even if it means turning to the low brow sites.
seems like you and rip are out to prove something...
sorry i just go by the facts...and that does not include info from sites that believe in fictional beings.

Think what you wish - but I'm not the one bleating about how bad things are every day. Why exactly do people do that? PEST? (pre and post) That's as good of a guess as any - besides plain old partisanship.

I'm not trying to make war look good - however there is plenty of GOOD news coming from Iraq that people like you who look at things from a negative angle want to ignore.

Meh - keep on attacking the source instead of addressing the FACTS. :)

CsG

I did look at the information on the site, and i addressed them.

-why are they getting armour after combat operations, and is the admin only putting in the armour because of public outcry

It's good that armour is getting put in...it's about time!!

I was merely pointing out that even the good news was implemented wrong and if you have to get good news out of something done quite sloppy, that's pretty bad.

When you are throwing 100's of billions of dollars at a country, i sure hope some good comes out of it...telephones, electricity and water are a good start.

Good value for the money...hell no...
i really don't understand how any conservative can be for this war.

I dont see the difference between huge government programs and throwing money at iraq for no reason at all. (well you kind of have to now...fix what you broke)
 

tallest1

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2001
3,474
0
0
Funny how the american people only get facts on Iraq and the underlying circumstances leading to 9/11 when they're preceded by a 'scandal'. I'm starting to feel that if it weren't for the media some of us hate so much, we'd be getting as much rhetoric and half-truths as we got preceding the Iraq war